-->

Monday, August 25, 2025

Something New

 We feature each fortnight Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.   

“Touch Screen” by Philip Armstrong (Otago University Press, $NZ30); “Sick Power Trip” by Erik Kennedy (Te Herenga Waka University Press, $30); “In the Hollow of the Wave” by Nina Mingya Powles (Auckland University Press $NZ 24:99)

            Rare it is to have a poet who could be called a true philosopher. The blurb presented with Touch Screen tells me that Philip Armstrong is a lecturer in literature, writing and human-animal studies at the University of Canterbury, but he might as well be called a philosopher as his poetry delves deeply into the problems that go with our species and humanity – where we came from, where we are going, and how we are or are not now being dominated by machines. Sometimes – but not too often – Armstrong uses recherche or specialist words, especially when he is dealing with very small creatures.

            Wisely, Armstrong divides this collection into three separate sections because each deals with different ideas.

First part is called Glass, kicking off with a poem called “The Advancement of Learning”, that being the name of Francis Bacon’s early17th century speculations about knowledge and how humanity could advance via science. But do scientific advances necessarily make for a better world? Armstrong’s title “Touch Screen” refers to what is now available on computers. He questions how much we now rely upon artificial intelligence to make our decisions. His poems “Jacob’s Ladder” and “Personality Test” suggest a great sense of pessimism. “Uber-Ich” shows an annoyance at the way cars now tell us what to do and how we are supposed to drive.   Then there is a quirky, but intriguing, long poem “Immram”, a version of what navigation was like in ancient times, yet gradually beginning to rush along with great speed; and in a way being a version of the founding in New Zealand. And “at such speed we couldn’t tell what came between. / Skyline after skyline flickered past, / faster and faster and faster, / the way we forgave and still forgive / ourselves, over and over until / out fingers bleed”. In some of his poems, Armstrong feels stifled and makes reference to modern medical treatments. “Foreign Accent Syndrome”  fears the non-human languages that are being created on computers – “It makes you wonder what they might / be saying, smiling as they do with slightly / parted lips. Since meeting them in my dreams and my nightmares are identical. I wake / making confessions in a foreign tongue.”  But like any good poet, Armstrong is not stalled on one theme. Three poems – “My Life in Comics”, “My Own Goals” and “Anastomosis” -  tell us, very ironically, tales of his teenage days.

Excellent though these poems are, they are only the warm-up to Part Two Myth, wherein Armstrong looks at how we human beings began in the first place and whence we had evolved. “Humble Beginnings” gives us a sour version of our distant forebears. “Book of the Dead” is almost a dead-pan description of the ancient Egyptian burial customs, including nearly all the Egyptians  gods. In the end, the poem suggests that death is just the disintegration of particles – that after all we are merely dust. The poems “Drifters” and “Mere” combine ancient sages with modern technology – implying that we in some ways have not changed much. Most impelling of all in this collection, however, is the long sequence called “Life of Clay”, being 13 poems which deal in detail with not only evolution but with the fragility of human beings. Often Armstrong makes reference to Mary Shelley’s “monster”, made by Frankenstein, who was shaped by man, an appropriate metaphor given that, eons ago, our ancestors were more-or-less shaped out of clay. But the poem “Clay on the Rocks” again warns us that non-human forces (machinery, computers, touch screens etc.) are taking us over – “Now warming to the warming world / my pineal gland locates / two hundred and forty years of stalled / operating system updates. / Begins a monster download.” And the poem “A Branding Exercise” says “After two centuries / the power to galvanise dead matter has / been put into the hands of children”, conjuring up images of both technicians and teenagers fiddling with their computers and touch screens. The poem “The New, New Atlantis”, takes Francis Bacon’s “New Atlantis” to show how terrifying applied science has wrought . There follow poems about the ubiquity of [pocket] cameras, unwanted images and the loss of privacy. These are not in any way the ideas of somebody who does not appreciate modern science. They are the words of someone who intelligently critiques the down side of some applied modern scientific trends.

When we finally reach Part Three Dirt, we are in a different type of poetry. Yes, there is some speculation on how species have survived over the eons – for example the poem “Slow Stepper” which is almost a jolly account of what would happen if one were to be reincarnated as a tiny mite of some sort. But most of Dirt is made of descriptive versions of New Zealand ancient and modern. Hence there are poems about the explosion of Lake Taupo two thousand years ago; and about what is left of an abandoned goldrush town. Surprisingly poems like “Estuary Bay”, “Driftwood Sculpture” and “City Under Rain” come close to being a more conventional type of descriptive poetry, though Armstrong does make some biting comments on ecology and how it is often ignored. And, where pollution is concerned, consider the poem “Landfill” with its angry lines about “a rancid pile / of Feltex worn through / to the webbing, rolls / of an underlay stippled with black / mould, a tarp-wrapped trap complete / with decomposing rat, / car batteries, tyres, asbestos tiles: / back then there was nothing you couldn’t / offload: the landfill ‘reclaimed’ / territory from the mangroves…”

We human beings are very good at leaving messes behind us. And perhaps modern technology makes even bigger messes. 

 *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *. *.  *.  *

 

 

    Reading Erik Kennedy’s Sick Power Trip, I’m immediately on the side of poets and novelists who can blow their stacks with skill. Juvenal lashing out in all directions at everything that was wrong with ancient Rome. Jonathon Swift thumbing his nose at English politics. Any good satirist. Erik Kennedy -  American born, now New Zealander – is a very good satirist. But, as I suggested in reviewing his two earlier collections There’s No Place Like the Internet in Spring Time  and Another Beautiful Day Indoors, even good satire can sometimes curdle into carping.

Take some examples of Kennedy’s really cutting satire. Speaking of complaisance, consider “Individualistic Societies”, which opens the show by suggesting that you might as well give up “If a comet is heading for the earth, we must celebrate the ambition of the comet. “Loneliness Studies” is a good satire on our human inability to get on intimately with other people “Humans are the only animals / that think they’re not animals. / Chatbot chimps programmed / to miss each other and / to miss missing each other.” There is deep irony indeed in “The Health Benefits of Winter Sea Bathing”. The collection’s title Sick Power Trip comes from the poem “I Like Rich People, but I Couldn’t Eat a Whole One Myself”, strongly mocking the idea that super-rich people are different from the rest of us. “DARVO”, meaning ‘deny, attack, reverse victim and offender’, reminds us that “The most powerful forces in the universe are / the strong nuclear force, the electromagnetic force, / and the need terrible people have to believe / that they are the victims. The sun never sets on / the empire of grievances…”

All of these poems are doing the job they should do – that is, legitimate satire that alerts us to absurdity. BUT some of Kennedy poems turn to snarling at us, where “All Submarine Movies Are Christmas Movies” is angry at the whole idea of Christmas family gatherings. “Pacific Sea  Surface Temperature Anomalies” appears to be telling us that those who like swimming at the beach are “the clammy, suffering, sweltry, cynical , burned-out, / downhearted, vulnerable people go to the sea.”

Satire or snarling apart, Kennedy writes seriously about matters that concern him and should concern us. “Low Carbon Warfare” is a collection of statements that have been made by writers on current ideas related to warfare – mostly the statements are pro-warfare but some are opposed to the military-industrial complex. Putting this together keeps reminding us that some people ignore how existing weapons could nihilate all human beings on our planet. [Four pages at the back of the collection verify who wrote each of the comments that were made.] There are some poems that almost read as despair. “Everyone’s Trying on Their Old Nuclear War Poems” seems to suggest that such protest poems are old hat and “hating the bomb is assumed.” “Someone Put an Ancient Burial Ground Right Where a Hotel Needs to Go” is really a good lecture reminding us of the clash between pragmatism - wanting to go ahead with amenities -  and the value of preserving the ancient… but also noting that “archaeology is a destructive science. / What was excavated today can’t be put back tomorrow”. Some issues are really complex. Sometimes we are given not poetry at all but long prose statements, especially in “Bino” querying the value of heart transplants. Ditto “Soft Power” about the attitudes people have about animals other than us. Ditto “Pet Theories” which considers the relationship of pets and human beings.

Much of Kennedy’s work does have room for ambiguity : poems called “This Usually Represents a Desire to Achieve Greatness in Your Social or Professional Life” and “Enclosure of the Commons II” which suggests that if there were now commons [where people could graze their animals] the land would probably  be toxic and polluted with chemicals and therefore not worth grazing. “An Only Child Poem” suggests that only assertive people who are speaking in a public place are probably the type who were pampered as children. A kind of uncertainly is in the quasi-protest poem “Bystander Poem; or a Gaza Poem”, that is, chastising us for not caring about the situation but not taking sides.

If all this seems that Kennedy is deadly serious about everything, it’s worth noting that he can sometimes be nostalgic or even whimsical. There are a number of poems that are almost nostalgic -  as in seeing hippiedom as harmless nonsense (“Self-Defining Hippiedom Discourse”) ; and something got lost (“Gap in My CV”); and Dad’s interest in cars ( “Classic Cars Magazines”). “Bildungsroman” is concerned with growing up and “I’ve Been Huddling in Doorways” concerns being rootless in earlier years. “The Summer We All Called Cigarettes ‘Snargers’ ” could be read as criticising and poking fun at the way he behaved when he was younger… or nostalgia.

As for whimsy, there is the jump of imagination seeing moths and butterflies as if they were aeroplanes (“Magpie Moth vs Monarch Butterfly”). “Public Coughs” is deliberately doggerel in the Ogden Nash tradition with clunky rhymes. “A Nineteenth-Century Love Song” is also full of bouncily rhymes. “The Human Christmas Tree” is sheer surrealism. “We’ve All Been There” is both serious and witty when “I stored my plan for world peace / safely in my coat pocket, / and then I washed the coat.”

I’m chronicling all this simply as a means of saying that, though Kennedy is not only a skilled satirist, he is capable of writing in different tones. A very engaging collection.

·        *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.


 

            Born and raised in New Zealand but well acquainted with China and South-East Asia and now living in London, Nina Mingya Powles is obviously a poet with a very cosmopolitan outlook. In her second collection, she is often inspired by, or quotes, many poets and writers, mainly women, such as Virginia Woolf [from whom comes the phrase ‘in the hollow of the wave’], Sylvia Plath, Sin Chi Yin and others – poets who are very sensitive and who like to look at the small things in nature as well as the motions of the tides, the seasons and the preciseness of art. It’s important to note that this collection is a work of visual art as well as of poetry. The first section “A Woven Sea” could be read as a hybrid – art works [images of quilts etc.] sit next to Powles’ words. In much of her work, Powles is interested in textiles, and memory and the making of waves by the thread or the sea. Much later a section called “Spell of the Red Flowers” is free verse presented in neat square blocks of type, evidence of Powles interest in the visual impact of words.

            Powles tells us first that her grandfather used to stich quilts. There was a sewing machine and her grandmother was also into crafts; and “the machine belongs to memory and to a different time. / The machine belongs to the house, which still exits and also doesn’t exist” – introducing us to the persistence of memory, one of her continued themes. Later she tells us “memory is a house with scraped white walls. / I step inside and choose what to take, what to leave behind.” Our memories are always edited ones. She moves on to connect the thread of quilts and texture to the movement of water and the sea, giving examples of the process in making a quilt – cutting, layering, binding, patterning. This interest in craft-work is carried over in her poem “At the Metropolitan Museum, 1990” where she saw “two women strolling through a dark navy blue room filled with Chinese and Japanese silks, jade and red and blue embroidered with birds, leaves and pagodas, everything shimmering in low light. The women reach out to touch the fabrics, forgetting they are behind glass.” Elsewhere she speaks of a gown that can change the colour of a harbour. Again, the fluorescent nature of both water and silk are identified as one. So indeed are what is beautiful in nature.

In other poems, while often referring to South-East Asian crafts [batik etc.], she does occasionally  make nods to the reality of poverty in villages. And yet, what hands have made are also beautiful. In a poem called “A gown is a glacier, receding” she writes “a gown is a rocky slope / a gown is a glacier, receding / a gown is a slow accumulation / a gown is an edifice that forms around an opening / a gown is a fissure where molten rock material emerges” and later “a pleat is a faultline / a pleat is a form of architecture / a pleat is an abrupt geological formation / a pleat must lie outside the borders of gender / a pleat is a sentence written by hand on folded paper.”

The last section of this collection introduces her interest in animals – particularly dogs – and she looks at how preparing food can also be a delicate skill. Her final poems here are about the tides, phases of the moon and the moods they conjure up. 

If I were to categorise the type of poetry Powles writes, I would call it post-modernist romanticism. This is not intended as a slur. Powles writes with delicacy, has an eye for what is beautiful and values the skills of those who can produce tactile art.

 

Something Old

 Not everything worth reading is hot off the press. In this section, we recommend "something old" that is still well worth reading. "Something Old" can mean anything from a venerable and antique classic to a good book first published year or two ago.

                  “PINCHER MARTIN” by William Golding (First published in 1956)

Some years ago I wrote on this blog a critique of William Golding’s second novel The Inheritors. I made it clear that Golding’s first novel Lord of the Flies was so well known that I would be talking to the wrong audience if they did not already know the novel or had read it. Surely most high-school English teachers have set Lord of the Flies as an essential text. [I should know because I was one of those teachers.] Regarding William Golding (1911-1983, Nobel Laureate), his early novels could basically be called allegories or fables. To make it clear, Lord of the Flies is about the way even children can become violent savages if they are given the opportunity. The boys in the novel ignore the more level-headed ones among them and literally turn to murder. We human beings have many flaws built into us – jealousy, violence, envy, deceit etc. – even if we are intelligent, reasoning creatures. The Inheritors tries, allegorically, to understand why we human beings became so flawed. In this case, Golding sees our distant ancestors, homo sapiens sapiens, as violent creatures who kill a more primitive species of homo sapiens, presumably Neanderthals. In both novels Golding is suggesting what Christians would call “original sin”. Though we were made in the image of God, there was “the Fall” when we fell out with God. In Lord of the Flies the boys land on what at first seems an island paradise. The Neanderthals in The Inheritors live as if it were the Garden of Eden. Both are destroyed by homo sapiens sapiens.

Pincher Martin is one of Golding’s shortest novels [nearly all of his novels are short] but I personally found it one of the most difficult to read. A synopsis might show why this is so. 

Golding was a lieutenant in the Royal Navy in the Second World War and knew how treacherous the sea could be – a very dangerous place. He never encounted German U-Boats but he knew that they targeted British ships. Christopher Hadley Martin (nickname “Pincher” Martin) is a petty officer in a destroyer. A U-Boat torpedoes it. As the destroyer sinks, Pincher Martin is thrown overboard. He cries for help, but none comes. He kicks off his seaboots and starts swimming. With great effort, he reaches a small rock sticking up in the vast Atlantic ocean. He is able to, painfully, drag himself onto the rock. He is alone and there is no rescue in sight.

  And this is where the reading can become difficult. The first three chapters give us  minute details of how Pincher Martin climbs up onto the rock – the difficulty of getting on to the rock; the limpets and mussels and barnacles and green smears of seaweed; the waves that push him and pull him back; the slippery surface of the rock making it hard to climb; the coldness; the pain of crawling along rough rocks. Golding appears to be stopping time by noting every possible detail. Time is not happening as we think it should.

Pincher Martin is alone. He often talks to himself. He is enterprising. He works out how to feed himself on the available mussels and crayfish. We at first see him as an heroic person, surviving in an appalling situation. But soon delusions crowd his brain. For amusement, he names different parts of the rock as High Street and the Red Lion, and he piles up stones in the hope of being seen and rescued… but he begins to see the pile as looking like the shape of a man. He calls it the Dwarf. And the whimsical naming of streets reminds him of places he remembers. He recalls many things in his life. And at this point we understand that Pincher Martin is not a hero but he is a truly evil man.  He was formerly an actor who did not do very well in his profession– so he signed on to the navy. Not only did he often cheat people but he raped a woman, cuckolded a friend and was planning to murder one of his fellow seamen. There are flashbacks to conversations he had with colleagues and friends. His life has been opportunistic and narcissistic and potentially murderous. Later, when he says “I am alone”, he is not only referring to the loneliness of being in the middle of an ocean, but he is admitting to himself that he has never really had friends or loved them. He is cut off from the human race… like Cain.

He notices that, in all the time he has been on the rock, he has never once excreted. He also notices a red lobster swimming in the sea. There is no such thing as a red lobster swimming in the sea [they turn red only when they are cooked]. It now dawns on him. He is not only hallucinating. He is really already dead. He argues with God. Curses. Curses himself.

His body is washed up on a beach in the Hebrides. A naval doctor examines the corpse and, in the last words of the novel, he says “He didn’t even have time to kick off his seaboots.” In other words, he was dead by the time he was thrown off the sinking destroyer. The whole novel was what passed in Pincher Martin’s brain in a split second.

Some readers have suggested that Golding was mainly concerned with the old question of what we might think in the last moment before we die.  The best-known tale going in that direction is Ambrose Bierce’s short-story “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge”. Perhaps Golding was thinking about that idea, but it is not his main interest. Golding was not a conventional Christian. His father was an atheist. Golding went to, and taught in, Anglican schools but that was mainly pro forma. Often Golding said he was an atheist. But like it or not, he did use Christian concepts in his early novels and – as you will see – he adopted some specifically Catholic ones in his third novel Pincher Martin. I say this because, researching this novel,  I caught up with a B.B.C. interview he gave in the late 1950s, when his fourth novel had just come out [you can look it up on You Tube, as I did]. Golding said Pincher Martin is “a novel about a dead man” and goes on to say that, though he wasn’t Catholic, he wanted to write a story about Purgatory, the Catholic idea that there is, between heaven and hell, a possible cleansing for the sinful. Also, in another interview, his daughter said that her father told her that Pincher Martin had to be read as an “unredeemed wicked character”. Hence Pincher Martin’s cursing God.

Just a few side comments – the novel was presented in England as simply Pincher Martin. But when it was published in America it was presented as Pincher Martin – The Two Deaths of  Christopher Martin. Maybe American readers have to have things spelled out for them. Then there’s that odd nickname “Pincher” Martin. Just as in English slang, “Dusty” Miller meant somebody old fashioned, and “Snobby” Clark meant more-or-less a pretentious person, especially lower-middle-class people like clerks; so “Pincher” Martin meant somebody untrustworthy, because he pinched [stole] things… and the main character of this novel.is certainly untrustworthy.

Final comment – if you want to, you can search out [once again on You Tube] a “Cinematic Opera” based on Pincher Martin by Oliver Rutland. It is surprisingly very good but, like the novel, it is gruelling.

Something Thoughtful

   Nicholas Reid reflects in essay form on general matters and ideas related to literature, history, popular culture and the arts, or just life in general. You are free to agree or disagree with him.     

                                    MY FAVOURITE PIECE OF ART

When I was a young teenager, and even before that, I frequently went to, or was taken to, the Auckland City central art gallery.  Inevitably there were some paintings that became my favourites, although some of them now seem not so great; but I still like them simply for the sake of nostalgia. The art gallery has naturally changed over many years. Some works of art have been replaced, some have been put into storage, and the layout of the gallery itself has changed radically.  But this year, carrying my pocket phone, I visited the gallery and decided to look at those works of art I once admired. [Forgive my wonky photos]

Of course I laughed a little at the 18th century version of two tigers coming into their cave, neatly framed by the cave itself. To me they looked like domesticated puss-cats.


 

I was still awed by the violent seascape as a mighty ship is toppled into the fierce waves.    


I was still amused by the woman being duped by an old palm-reader as two other characters smirk or are confused.                       


 

And naturally I delighted in Henry Fuseli’s melodramatic version of Macbeth and Banquo meeting the witches, the two men looking more like naked Greek statues than Scots warriors. [BTW, this image was not in the gallery when I was a kid – I think it was a more recent acquisition. ]

 


But the one piece of art that I loved the best, man and boy, was Jacob Epstein’s sculpture which was labelled as “Rock Drill”. As a boy, I understood that it was not a literal image of something living, but was created by the sculptor [and as a boy I hadn’t yet learned the words “Modernism” or “Cubism” or “Vorticism”]. What I saw looked like an elongated helmet of the sort that would have been worn by a medieval knight, and yet in the lower part of “Rock Drill” there were softer images which seemed to me to be like babies or children who were trapped inside. I wasn’t afraid of it, but I was intrigued by it. 

 

 

Only much later, on my more recent visits to the art gallery, did I find a placard explaining the sculpture. “Rock Drill” was made by Jacob Epstein in 1913-15. It originally was a larger piece of work standing atop what I saw… but Epstein removed this upper part as his ideas changed when the (First) World War came along, leaving only the torso that was left; so it is now properly called “Torso from the ‘Rock Drill’ ”. I understand that the “Torso” in the Auckland art gallery is a cast that was made in 1961. I still admire it and am still intrigued by it. And the last time I went to the gallery, and as I left, I said to the good people on the front desk that it was the best thing there was in the gallery.    

Footnote: Sadly Jacob Epstein’s works are rarely seen in New Zealand, most being in England or in American art galleries. But at least I can say that, aged 11 and travelling with my parents and three siblings, I was able to see Epstein’s formidable “St. Michael’s Victory Over the Devil” on the wall of the renewed Coventry Cathedral. It was made in 1958

Monday, August 11, 2025

Something New

 We feature each fortnight Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.  

WE WHO WRESTLE WITH GOD  by JORDAN B. PETERSON (Published by Penguin-Random House. Price in New Zealand $35) 

 


Even to mention the name of Jordan Peterson is to raise some people’s hackles. To tell you what you probably already know, he has a wide readership, often lectures, is frequently interviewed on television and other platforms, and has written about the way people should be able to grow up, take responsibility and mature. A Canadian, he was for years a professor of psychology and taught in many universities. So why did he become a person wrapped in controversy? It began when he ran up against the transgender movement. Peterson loudly protested against “compelled speech”  - that is, people had to accept and use the new transgender movement’s jargon or be sanctioned. Later, under pressure, the society of Canadian psychologists ordered him to be sanctioned… but they had to admit that it had nothing to do with what he had taught or what he had done as a therapist. They were basically saying that he was lowering the standard of psychology by writing and giving talks in theatres in a popular way. One can’t help thinking that there was much envy about his success and (as is also true) that he earned a great amount by his writing and appearances. After going through his “punishment” he decamped from Canada and he now lives in the U. S. A .

Peterson has not yet declared that he is a Christian, but he appears to be well on his way to becoming one. He believes that many ancient texts are still relevant to us and worthwhile when it comes to matters of ethics and morality. It is foolish to assume  - as too many modernists do -  that only texts of the modern age are worth considering. To regard only what is currently fashionable is to miss out what is essential in the making of human beings. He begins quoting Gerard Manley Hopkins’s poem “Carrion Comfort” which suggests how difficult it is to deal with God, but how ultimately the struggle is rewarding. Hence the title We Who Wrestle With God, with the added words Perceptions of the Divine. His preface called “Foreshadowing: The Still, Small Voice” tells in detail the story of Elijah wherein the still small voice [of God] leads to consciousness and an awareness of a moral order. It is “what is the appropriate hierarchy of value through which the world most productively, generously and sustainably reveals itself”. He also asserts in his preface that “The Bible is the library of stories on which the most productive, freest, and most stable and peaceful societies the world has ever known are predicated – the foundation of the West, plain and simple.”

To make his case, what follows is presented to us over about 500 pages. We Who Wrestle With God is what is best called a commentary on the first five books of the Bible (the Torah – the Law), but also referring to some later Hebrew texts; and every so often Peterson quotes from the New Testament. He is exploring the importance of a universal ethical code. Tiresome though it is, to explain this long and detailed text the best thing I can do is to summarise each chapter. Thus…

1 In the Beginning

God passes to us consciousness and being aware of the goodness of nature around us. God gives us nurture and guides us. Man needs woman as woman needs man [Adam and Eve]. They complement each other. And “The world cannot survive if it is ruled by sex and power. Those forces degenerate into tyranny and chaos intertwined, intermingled and married when they are raised to the highest place. The world of the proper sovereign order is and must be ruled instead by the pattern of encounter with chaos, upward striving, truth, and voluntary sacrifice precisely in the manner that is most deeply and comprehensively encoded in the biblical corpus.” (p. 20) Further “Eve corresponds to Adam precisely as the Taoist yin does to yang. It is her job to bring to her partner’s attention all the concerns that Adam may have overlooked, involved as he is in his enterprise of responsible stewardship. He is called upon in that work to extend, expand, and update his naming and subduing in keeping with the new and even novel needs of the time, without too radically, pridefully, or presumptuously restructuring the entire tradition. Eve’s role is on keeping with the well-known personality differences between men and women, evident cross-culturally, and more pronounced in more egalitarian societies….” (pp. 23-24) Hear we have the idea that there is a core of behaviour, from primeval times, that is still relevant. Peterson makes a good case for God and the necessity of individuals needing society.

2 Adam, Eve, Pride, Self-Consciousness and the Fall

Here Peterson asks how much we can be ‘made in the image of God’. The Garden of Eden is the testing ground for humanity. Eve’s sin [the forbidden tree etc.] is hubris in thinking she embraces all peoples [as she carries all in her womb]. Adam’s hubris is to think that he is lord and master of all things as he surveys his world. As for the serpent, this is the temptation that leads to evil. Relating this to the present day, Peterson the psychologist says “The fact of the emergence of sophisticated self-realization with maturity implies that some of the fall is a mere consequence of growth. People abandon their childish naivete – not without pain – as they come to confront the bedrock realities of life: the harshness of the natural world; the tyranny of the social world; the sinful impulsive and hedonistic proclivities of the tempted individual. It is by no means obvious, in addition, that our descent into the cynicism that is so often the replacement for childhood trust and wonder is not an improvement, in some dark and necessary manner… the fall from childhood naivety is a prerequisite to maturity… To become self-conscious is to know nakedness, limitation, and mortality…” p.68

3 Cain, Abel and Sacrifice

From the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve are therefore expelled and, hitting harsh reality, they have to toil. While Adam and Eve were made directly by God, their offspring are  made in part by human beings. The essence of rivalry and warfare is the desire to destroy what others have achieved, and this is the meaning of the story of Cain and Abel. Abel gives a real sacrifice to God, giving up something that was valuable to him. Cain does not give a real sacrifice, giving up something that was not valuable to him. Cain gives a mere token. This, says Peterson, betrays not only God but himself. As I see it, Peterson is now explaining how flawed human beings are and how there is a deep tendency in us to be tempted to harm others. Cain kills his brother… and thenceforth there are always those who are violent and destructive. This is often a struggle within us. Thus “humility and faith versus pride, despair and vengeful anger”. When referring to the legacy of Cain in us, Peterson often mentions Dostoyevsky’s Raskolnikov, the murderer in Crime and Punishment  who thinks that he is superior than other people and above the law. [ Dostoyevsky is clearly one of Peterson’s favourite writers – he often mentions him.]

4 Noah: God as the Call to Prepare

Cain’s spirit has come to rule the world. Resentment at higher groups leads to murder on a massive scale. There is “a pattern of degeneration” i.e. human behaviour gradually degenerates. Hence the Deluge and the saving of only the righteous few [in the Ark]. In case you read this as a ridiculous fable, Peterson reminds us that “ cultures who concentrate too much on what passes for present wisdom (“we can dispense with the superstitious foolishness of the past”) will lose the vertical traditional orientation that protects them against mere fads of consensus.” (Pg. 161) In other words, there is much wisdom in this passage.

5 The Tower of Babel: God Versus Tyranny

As Peterson says, before Babylon and prior to the Tower of Babel, there were many tales in the Middle East of gods punishing those who attempted to take over the role of heaven. The story of the Tower of Babel was not new, but it emphasises the human attempt to usurp God. What was more important was the Bible’s critique of the moral decline of Babylon. There is in scripture reference to a “brutish form”. Peterson relates it to the present day thus: “The ‘brutish form’ referred to is the true identity lurking behind the mask of shallow sexual attractiveness monetized in the present world as often, and in so many diverse forms – all produced, distributed, and purchased by the technological sons of Cain… This is certainly the technologically-mediated subjugation of the feminine to the hedonistic and narrowly economic and, more deeply, the alliance of the prostitute (or her virtual equivalents) with the terrible spirit of arrogant irresponsibility characterizing the builders of the eternal Babylon.” (pp 200 -201) On his way, considering the denigration of morals, he quotes Milton and Revelation, depicting Hell as the loss of morality on a larger scale with the dominance of elites scorning moral sense. When he discusses the tyrants in the Bible, he sees them made in the pattern of Cain. In the modern world, he sees in Cain narcissists who want to always be the centre of attention lacking all empathy, and authoritarian regimes (Fascist, Communist etc.) who revel in controlling whole nations.

6 Abraham: God as Spirited Call to Adventure

Abraham [formerly Abram] has many flaws [as we all have]. He is given a covenant with God and in effect he is being told to dare to go beyond the comforts he is used to. In this case, he dares to go on a long journey, with all its perils [including the challenging degeneration of Sodom and Gomorrah]. Peterson interprets this as an existential problem that is still with us – the big price you have to pay if you follow the necessary call and the problems you will meet. Thus “If the cost of reality is death, how might reality manifest itself, to justify that price? That is the ultimate question, with the paradisal dream providing the impossible answer. God provides an intimation, with the initial call. If the requirement to strive forward in the world is accepted, the reward is limitless: a life well-lived, the establishment of a genuine and stellar reputation, the founding of a nation, and a blessing on the entire world. Is that sufficient to pay for death? There is no a priori answer. That is the curse of the true existential dilemma. Is it worth it? You are fated to find out along the way.” (pp. 249 – 250)  And in this existential context, God tests us, which is where we struggle with God. God tests Abraham’s wife Sarah [previously Sarai] by making her barren when she wants a child. She prays and prays. Only when she is very old, she gives birth to Isaac. God has tested her faith. God tests Abraham by telling him to sacrifice his son Isaac. Abraham prepares to do so. God stays his hand. Abraham’s faith was tested. [This story is often quoted by atheists as proof that God must be some sort of sadist toying with human beings. In fact this story says quite the opposite. God says that real sacrifice is a very hard thing.]

7 Moses 1: God as Dreadful Spirit of Freedom

 

Moses is the archetype of the child who was cast away [the baby in the bullrushes etc.] but who became a leader and liberator, both leading the Hebrews who were fleeing from Egypt and presenting them with a God-given ethical code. The burning bush was his moment of being confronted by God, the “dreadful spirit of freedom”. Peterson has in this section a heading called “The Commandments as Explicit Revelation of Custom” explaining how a good society has to be coherent. 

 

8 Moses 2: Hedonism and Infantile Temptation

 

As well as having coherence a society must have laws… but who makes the laws? Says Peterson, referring to our present age: “It is not at all that the Israelites are insisting, with the fervour of authoritarian believers that the God they worship must be the One True God; it is that the true followers of Yahweh – those who wrestle with God – are always those seeking to discover what constitutes the genuine highest and uniting principle and then you live in accordance with that revelation. This is very different than the power-mad insistence that a given ideology or principle of power must rule; it is instead submission to the divine order, accompanied by willingness to make the painful, genuine, and personally costly sacrifices that are the eternally valid markers of true belief.”….    “The legitimate followers of the God of Abraham do not create their own values, as the philosopher Nietzsche insisted so wrongly that we must do, in the aftermath of the hypothetical demise of the divine.” [pp.351 -352]…. And finally…

 

9: Jonah and the Eternal Abyss

 

Jonah was called by God to go to the people of Nineveh and preach against their wickedness. Jonah tried to avoid God’s summon and ran away. Through many events (the story of the big fish etc.) Jonah submitted to fulfil God’s call. Wrestling with God often means you know the call is right even if you are loath to do what you should do [to put it horribly simplified].

 

  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *

In certain passages, while dealing with the concept of human beings “made in the image of God”, Peterson challenges the notion that human beings are made for no purpose but are merely the result of random procreation – the “selfish gene” idea popularised by Richard Dawkins.  Even the biologists who should know better, are mainly onboard with this: the famous “selfish gene” cares for nothing, for example, but replication at any cost – or so goes the story. Could it not be possible, however and instead, that the interest of the individual, truly pursuing his or her great adventure, do and must align perfectly with the demands of procreation, all things considered and wisely understood? This would mean a harmony from instinct to heaven, so to speak, instead of any inevitable and necessary opposition between biological impulse, motivation or drive (all inadequate conceptualizations) and the social order – no Hobbesian war of all against all or Rousseauian antithesis of society and noble savage.” [p.270]

  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *

 

 

Peterson’s Conclusion is eleven pages reiterating his main ideas, the greatest being first that the Bible is not a fairy tale but it holds much wisdom relevant to the present day; second, that life has a purpose – and that purpose will require us to face challenges in our life, hence the wrestling with either God or some other force or barrier; third, human behaviour is constant – we homo sapiens are essentially the same creatures now as our distant ancestors were in primeval times. Yes, we might have advanced with science, but there is still virtue, goodness, compassion AND as much anger, contempt, violence, jealousy, war, dishonesty etc.; fourth, societies crash when they are without real laws, and tyrants and determined idealogues [Fascists, Communists, Extreme Nationalists etc.] are always with us; five, there has to be a force [God] to remind us of what is essentially ethical and moral – the small voice; and six men and women are made what they are for a reason, so men cannot be women and women cannot be men. Men and women complement each other - not only theory but biology says so.

How do I assess We Who Wrestle With God ? In his prose, Peterson can be verbose. He often over-explains quotations from the Bible. On pp. 258-262 he tells us God knows that being human you have the capacity to take risks and therefore you can be an adventurer. He illustrates this by telling us the story of his sister. Some of his prose involves long and contorted sentences.

In spite of all this, whether you are agnostic, atheist, Christian, Jewish or any other religion, you will find much intelligence in this book, especially if you appreciate the value of wisdom coming from an ancient source. And if you don’t go along with everything Peterson writes, you can amuse yourself by picking holes in his reasoning… as I did when I read my way through Richard Dawkins’s The God Delusion.

Something Old


 Not everything worth reading is hot off the press. In this section, we recommend "something old" that is still well worth reading. "Something Old" can mean anything from a venerable and antique classic to a good book first published year or two ago.  

     “THE HOUSE WITH THE GREEN SHUTTERS” by George Douglas (First published in 1901)

 

            Imagine you are a young Scotsman who is very intelligent and has won a scholarship to the university of Oxford. He reads a lot, including current fiction set in Scotland. Imagine you have become sick of all the sweet little Scottish novels that are being churned out – about charming, picturesque small Scottish towns where people get on very well with one another, look after one another, occasionally have a harmless dram and make cheerful, harmless jokes about the dominie and the deacon as they watch the beautiful sun go down over the brae. They always have happy endings of course.  Imagine if the young man wants to hit back at this romanticised rubbish. He rebels. He decides to write a novel about what small Scottish towns are really like – the back-biting and nasty parochialism where poisonous gossip is the main currency and people are always scheming to take successful people down a peg.

So the young author writes his novel. It is called The House With the Green Shutters. When it is first published, it immediately becomes what we would now call a best-seller. George Douglas  [full name George Douglas Brown, born 1869 – died 1902] intended to write more novels. But he died relatively young (aged 33) in 1902, the year after his only novel came out. Douglas certainly depicted small Scottish towns as they often were over a century ago, and for some years The House With the Green Shutters was regarded as a minor classic. But few now see it that way. The hard fact is that, despite Douglas’s attempted reality, the novel goes over-the-top. In The House With the Green Shutters nearly every character is venal, underhanded, bullying or cowardly. Is this plausible, even in one small town? Worse, gradually what started out as a sort of reality turns into raw improbable melodrama.

 

                                George Douglas apparently with a very severe Scottish gaze

Synopsis as brief as I can make it: The setting is a small town in Ayrshire called Barbie. The time is the late 19th century. John Gourlay is the most wealthy man in town. He is a big, bullying man. He intimidates his wife and daughter and he regards his one-and-only son John [sometimes called Jock] as a weakling and perhaps a simpleton – certainly not a worthy heir for aggressive John Gourlay, especially when the boy is so easily beaten up by other boys at the local school. Gourlay owns a large, dominating house, grander than other houses in the town and commonly referred to as “the house with the green shutters”. Much of his wealth comes from being a carter, with a string of underpaid employees who, in Gourlay’s many carts, deliver coal and various goods to the town and environs. Many people envy Gourlay’s wealth as well as hating his bullying ways. A group of men known as the “bodies” [only one of the hundreds of Scottish words when there is dialogue in this novel] gather around in the evening and gossip, always negatively and denigrating anybody who seems to be succeeding in any way. Provost and Deacon – who are supposed to be pillars of the council and the church – are part of the “bodies”. And of course they hate Gourlay. So they are delighted when a new entrepreneur comes to town, Wilson, who not only has acquired  a modern “emporium” [fancy old-fashion name for a store selling all sorts of goods] but who is also savvy enough to know that railways are now taking over carts for carrying goods. Gourlay begins to lose his customers. He makes less and less money until he begins -  without telling his wife -  that he bit by bit has mortgaged his house. His nemesis Wilson has a bright son and Wilson has the wealth to send his son to the University of Edinburgh. Foolishly, to keep up with what he thinks is his prestige, Gourlay also pays for his son to go to the University of Edinburgh. So more of his money drains away. He is humiliated when he discovers that, without knowing it, he has taken up some work by a company that is really run by Wilson. He is now openly ridiculed for all his bluster. There is only one moment in the novel when he says something positive to his son. Young Jock wins, at the university, a prize for an essay he has written. Gourlay congratulates him, but only because Wilson’s son hasn’t yet won any prize. What Gourlay doesn’t know is that Jock is hardly doing any study at Edinburgh. He has fallen in with a group of more wealthy students who can waste a lot of time carousing and drinking. Jock joins them, gradually takes to drinking whisky and bit by bit becomes an incurable alcoholic. He thinks he is being witty when he insults a professor… and he is expelled from the university. He comes home in disgrace… to the glee of all the town’s gossipers and to the wrath of Gourlay. Dear reader, let me simplify how it all wraps up. Gourlay shouts, intimidates and almost beats up his feeble son to the tears of his timid wife. His son runs away, drinks even more whisky and feels he can deal with his father. He goes back home and kills his father by bashing him with a fire-poker . His mother wants to shield her son from being hanged, so they clean things up to look it as if Gourlay fell. But Jock, by now plagued with delirium tremens and completely disoriented, commits suicide by drinking poison. Mother is now riddled with cancer. Mother and daughter now discover that the mortgage cannot be paid and they are going to be thrown out of their house. They have nowhere else to go. So, after reading a soothing chapter from the Bible, they both commit suicide by drinking such poison as Jock had left. The “bodies” and other gossipers think Gourlay got what he deserved. 


I do implore you not to blame me for this messy and in many ways ridiculous final melodrama. The House With the Green Shutters has many other faults. For those who do not understand Scottish dialects [and I am one of them] it is difficult to plough your way through some of the conversations on the page. Then there is George Douglas’s habit of describing characters physically in detail, but never making it clear why they behave the way they do. In other words, we do not really understand how they think, especially when it comes to the “bodies” and others. It is just taken for granted that they are malicious, just as we have to take it for granted that Gourlay is a violent bully without learning how he came to be that way. Boil the novel down and it’s essentially about the hubris and downfall of a tyrant in a small-minded town.

But this isn’t doing full justice to Douglas. First, there is obviously the truth that, in Scotland in the 19th. century, technology was moving on and for the first time small towns were also moving on from horse-drawn carts to railways. That of course is part of Gourlay’s downfall, but it is dramatized clearly. Then there are some episodes that have a certain brilliance. In the early chapters, when young Jock is still an unhappy schoolboy, Douglas examines clearly how Jock thinks – intimidated by his father naturally, but he has his own perspective on the world. Jock is daunted by the thought of how huge the universe must be and how small and insignificant he must be. He escapes from his father by hiding in the loft and reading trash which he cannot follow. There are other high points in the novel, such as the vignette in which a pompous church-man, hearing that Jock has gained a prize for an essay, collars Jack and proceeds to try proving how erudite he is – which he clearly isn’t. There are other characters who stand out and – even if there are only one or two –they are compassionate and refuse to ridicule those who are down, such as the baker who calls out the “bodies” for their hypocrisy and their vicious gossip. 

Having said all this, though, The House With the Green Shutters fails to be a classic. There is little depth to it. Apparently, recently in Scotland there have been dramatized versions of the novel for the stage, but the novel is not likely to become a best-seller again.  

            Now for one of my awful confessions. I first read the novel by picking it off my father’s shelves when I was a young teenager, maybe aged about 14. I was intrigued by it, identified with the intimidated young boy [not that I had a father like Gourlay] and, at that age, shared some ideas about how vast the universe was and how daunting. As for the Scottish dialect words, I just put up with them. At that age I thought it was a great book. But that was then and this is now. I kept the book and it is the one that I now have on my shelves. It was published in 1933 by the old Collins Clear-Type Press. Included were five pictures by the artist Sidney Stanley, some of them almost surreal. The one that depicted Gourlay’s son overwhelmed by the “vast totality of things” still haunts me.

            Nasty Footnote: In 1932, the popular novelist A.J.Cronin wrote his first novel Hatter’s Castle. He went on to write such novels as The Citadel, The Stars Look Down, and The Keys To the Kingdom. All of them were turned into films, including Hatter’s Castle and very many others. He also invented the character of Doctor Findlay who became a British television favourite. But after Hatter’s Castle was published, some pointed out that it was very like George Douglas’s The House With the Green Shutters. I found on-line a letter that was published in The Spectator in the mid-1930s. It went thus: SIR,— No reviewer pointed out about “Hatter's Castle”… is nearly a replica of “The House With The Green Shutters”, the almost forgotten masterpiece of George Douglas….In both books a dour, avaricious Scot is the central figure—the hatter of Dr. Cronin's book is the alter ego of John Gourlay of The House With The Green Shutters—and the children of each are weaklings, with similar destinies. Whilst not suggesting plagiarism, I think that Dr. Cronin was sub-consciously influenced by the plan and general theme of the earlier novel.” Oh dear. How often writers steal ideas from other writers.