Not
everything worth reading is hot off the press. In this section, we recommend "something old" that is still well worth
reading. "Something old" can mean anything from a venerable and antique
classic to a good book first published four or more years ago.
“THE SPIRAL ASCENT” by Edward Upward (a
trilogy of novels published as one volume in 1977 - In the Thirties first published in 1962; The Rotten Elements first published in 1969; No Home But the Struggle first published in the omnibus volume in
1977)
There
are writers who are mentioned in nearly all the literary histories of their
age, without themselves ever becoming widely read. There are usually good
reasons for this. Case in point – Edward Upward (1903-2009), who died at the
age of 105, long after the era with which he was obsessed. I know he had an odd
name and I recall one of my tutors at university, 40 years ago, saying that he
at first assumed it was a pseudonym until he discovered it really was the author’s
name.
Edward Upward is
one of those minor writers who seem doomed to be remembered only as footnotes
in the biographies of more illustrious literary associates. In the 1930s, he
was a close friend and advisor to his schoolmate Christopher Isherwood, and later
to W.H.Auden, even though he himself was not homosexual as they both were.
Isherwood and (at least at first) Auden saw him as their literary master, took
ideas from him, and submitted work to him for his approval. Upward appears as
“Allen Chalmers” in Isherwood’s memoir Lions
and Shadows and Upward allowed some of his short stories to be published
under that fictitious name. He had a certain success with some poems and with a
surrealistic novel.
Then he
published nothing for about 25 years. He married, had a son and a daughter, and
taught at a minor public school for thirty years, where he kept his political
views to himself although he remained very much of the Hard Left in his
activism.
His trilogy of
autobiographical novels The Spiral Ascent
is his attempt to say the “last word” about his twin obsessions – poetry and
politics – and helps explain his long silence. It took him over fifteen years
to write. The first two novels, In the
Thirties and The Rotten Elements,
were originally published – years apart – in the 1960s, but they are so much of
a piece that it is hard to see how they could ever have been read separately.
Heinemann publishers accepted these first two novels, but they both received
almost universal raspberries from critics for their bland and dull style.
Heinemann therefore rejected the third novel. They were induced to publish a
one-volume omnibus edition, under the title The
Spiral Ascent and including the third novel No Home But the Struggle, only when they received an Arts Council
grant to do so.
In the Thirties introduces
Alan Sebrill – transparently Upward himself – disillusioned with his futile,
lazy, middle-class life, frustrated that his attempts to write poetry have led
nowhere, and on the brink of suicide. He finds a purpose and a sense of
solidarity only when he joins the British Communist Party. By novel’s end he is
married to Elsie (a fellow Communist), rearing for the fight against Fascism,
Imperialism and Capitalism and convinced that his new sense of meaning will
enable him to write good and meaningful poetry. Some critics have noted that
this is one of the few novels originating in the 1930s (albeit written thirty
years later), which depicts homegrown British Fascism as a real threat.
But The Rotten Elements is a rather more
depressing work. After the Second World War, Alan and Elsie have to leave the
Communist Party (as Edward Upward and his wife Hilda did in 1948) – not because
they have lost faith in Communism, but because they believe the British Party
has deviated too far from basic Marxist principles. Yet the alert reader will
note that in fact Alan is more of a Stalinist hard-liner than his
fellow-Communist antagonists are. The novel is shot through with an element of
distrust almost amounting to paranoia. There are suggestions of police spies,
party factionalism, infighting and complete intellectual dishonesty in the
leadership. As he is fictionalising straight autobiography, Upward seems to be
settling some old scores in the characterization of some of his fellow Communists
– literary portraits of obscure CP members, which will mean nothing to most
readers.
Throughout The Rotten Elements, Alan’s mind swings,
like a too-mechanical metronome, between devotion to poetry and devotion to the
continuing class struggle.
By cataloguing
facts about the physical world and social tensions, the first two novels have
some documentary value. But Upward’s secondary characters are unconvincing
stereotypes – they have that awful Shavian tendency to be mouthpieces for
ideological viewpoints, or social “types”. There is a stilted, self-expository
quality to much of the dialogue, although it can be an advantage, where clarity
is concerned, in scenes of polemical debate.
Alan Sebrill is
supposedly intensely concerned with world affairs and literature. Yet he is
insensitive to many of the important events of his age. Not once do we hear of
him reading a contemporary novel, poem or play. He constantly worries about the
effects on him of “the habits of a
middle-class upbringing”, and yet we are told nothing about his background.
It is as if the author has put himself in a straightjacket by concentrating so
exclusively on political matters that he takes his main character’s bourgeois
background as read.
Only in the
third novel, No Home But the Struggle,
which was first published as part of the single-volume trilogy in 1977, does
Upward really let it all hang out. Now living through the 1960s, Alan Sebrill
confines his political activities to the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and
believes he has at last achieved a balance between poetry and politics. The
bulk of the novel is taken up with all those things he suppressed in the first
two volumes of the trilogy – memories of childhood and family friends;
schooling; adolescent love-affairs; student days at Cambridge; friendship with
Richard Marple (i.e. Christopher Isherwood) and the first stirrings of poetic
inspiration. Upward drops his earlier subterfuge and writes directly in the
first person.
In its richer
variety of events, and the greater honesty of its style, No Home But the Struggle is certainly the most readable of the
three novels. But again alert readers will note what Upward misses out many of
the things that would have been essential to the life like Upward and his
fictitious alter ego. The 1950s, the matter of Hungary, and a new wave of
disillusionment sweeping Western Communists, simply aren’t here.
After the nearly
800 pages of the whole of The Spiral
Ascent, what is the world-shattering conclusion Alan Sebrill reaches? Only
that a poet cannot be free if he subjects himself to the rigid dogma of any
political party. This conclusion was no doubt a major turning point in Edward
Upward’s life. But I suspect most readers will have reached it about 700 pages
before his hero does. And he when he does reach it, one still detects a wide
streak of sentimental Stalinist nostalgia in Upward’s other self.
Confessional
Footnote One: I first read The Spiral Ascent when I was in my twenties, and reviewed it for
the now-defunct Auckland Star (4
February 1978 to be precise, if you have a way of checking). I have
cannibalised that review here, after reacquainting myself with Upward’s
trilogy.
Confessional
Footnote Two: I have not read a newly-published
biography of Edward Upward, Peter Stansky’s Edward
Upward: Art and Life. I have only read reviews of it in some English
publications. Apparently Stansky argues that, as a literary figure, Upward was
really killed by his adoption of Stalinist “social
realism”. Stansky also remarks wittily that Upward “became very well known for being forgotten.” Quite.
No comments:
Post a Comment