Nicholas Reid reflects in essay form on general matters and ideas related to literature, history, popular culture and the arts. You are free to agree or disagree with him.
What do you do physically while
reading a book?
Do you lounge in an armchair and
therefore court sleep or at least inattention to the text? Sometimes, up
against reviewing deadlines and knowing that I have to get through a book in a
set time, I keep myself awake by standing up as I read, balancing an open book
on one of my wife’s music stands.
Do you sit with your book at the
kitchen table, so that you can enjoy the company of your family or flat-mates
as you read? Again, you could be courting inattention even if you enjoy the
gregariousness.
Or do you – as I do when I’m
wrestling with a really serious tome – sit at your desk student-style, hunched
over the text and making notes?
There are many wrong postures in
which to read a book. Lying on a bed is one of the worst; and if you think you
can read seriously while lounging on the beach, then what you are reading is
probably airport-lounge writing.
Apart from the inappropriate
postures, though, there are other bad habits you can get into when reading.
One of my own worst habits is
reading against a background of music. I hasten to say, there are some kinds of
writing that I would never put to a soundtrack.
I would never have music playing
while I was reading poetry. The more overt rhythms of music would clash with
the more subtle metres of poetry, and I would do justice to neither.
Nevertheless, I do have this
habit of putting on some jazz or orchestral music when reading other genres.
And sometimes I get extra clever
by trying to make the music appropriate to the text.
I am reading the Argentinian
Tomas Eloy Martinez’s weird and surreal Santa
Evita, a “biography” of the corpse of Eva Peron. So on I put my double CD
set of Carlos Gardel, together with my double CD set of tangos by various other
artists of the 1930s and 1940s, reflecting that some of them would have been
known to, and heard by, Evita when she was alive.
I read Therese Anne Fowler’s
recent novel Z, about the somewhat
unhinged Zelda Fitzgerald and her dazzling, destructive life in the 1920s. And
on goes my collection of Bix Baederbecke and Jelly Roll Morton and King Oliver
and the other exponents of “hot” jazz in the 1920s, to whose beat Zelda could
well have Charleston-ed and Black-Bottomed.
I can’t pull this trick for too
many books, and if I were reading some postmodern piece of cyber-punk, I admit
I wouldn’t have the music to accommodate it. But my last reading of Henry
Fielding was accompanied by Handel oratorios.
Part of the attraction of this
practice is the raising of ghosts. To read about a particular past against the
very noises of that past can both conjure up appropriate imagery and make the
heart skip a beat. It reminds me of the time when I was researching an opera
programme note to do with an opera by Verdi; and as I scribbled, I had playing
a CD re-pressing and re-mastering and expert restoration of primitive sound
recordings from the earliest 1900s. One was a fierce baritone singing Iago’s
demonic creed from Otello. I was stunned
as I realised that this very voice would have been singing when Verdi was still
alive to hear it.
But I digress (as I often do when
improvising these “Something Thoughtfuls”).
Reading against music raises that
whole thorny issue of mood music. Musicians might object (quite rightly) that
attending to a text, while your sound-system blares, debases the status of
music to mere background noise. And from the literary perspective, even if
poetry is exempted, there is always the possibility that music will detract
from the rhythms of prose or other writing and become a mere distraction.
So – to read in comparative
silence or to read with music playing? Or is this a false dichotomy in a world
where it’s hard to steer clear of all noise while you are reading?
No comments:
Post a Comment