We feature each week Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books
“GREECE CRETE STALAG DACHAU – A New Zealand
Soldier’s Encounters with Hitler’s Army” by Jack Elworthy (Awa Press, $40); “TO
FIGHT ALONGSIDE FRIENDS – The First World War Diaries of Charlie May” Edited by
Gerry Harrison (Harper-Collins, $36:99)
I am both
pleased and enlightened to read a straightforward first-person narrative by a
soldier, who gives an unvarnished and far from glamourized account of his
experiences in the Second World War. Jack Elworthy wrote a rough version of
what is now called Greece Crete Stalag
Dachau some years before his death in 1999. Parts of his narrative were
broadcast on Radio New Zealand, but only now has his daughter Jo Elworthy
managed to edit her father’s writings into a publishable book.
Jack Elworthy’s
war career is quite easily summarised, and fairly signalled by that title Greece Crete Stalag Dachau.
Elworthy was a
professional soldier in New Zealand’s small army in the 1930s. When war broke
out in 1939 he was sent overseas as a warrant officer. In early 1941, Elworthy
was part of the British, Australian and New Zealand force sent to prop up
Greece ahead of a possible German invasion. The Germans duly invaded. The
Allied force went into full retreat. Most managed to be evacuated to the island
of Crete. Again the Germans invaded. Again the Allies retreated. Only a
minority were able to get away to Egypt. Elworthy was captured and spent nearly
four years surviving various German POW camps, first on Crete then (after
arduous forced marches and journeys in box-cars) in Germany. When he was liberated
by the Americans in 1945, his professional pride made him want to contribute to
the final Allied victory before he was returned home to New Zealand. He managed
to talk an American officer into allowing him to join the American
“Thunderbird” division, and for the last few months of the war he was, in
effect, a uniformed American soldier. It was his American division which
liberated Dachau concentration camp. Elworthy had some postwar adventures in
Europe, and had to negotiate repatriation committees, before he finally made it
back to New Zealand in 1947, seven years after he had last seen his wife and
young son. He speaks of the extreme dificulties of readjusting to domestic life
in New Zealand. He retired from the army in 1956.
That is a crude
summary of a book which is never cluttered with superfluous detail.
Some of the
things Elworthy records came as great surprises to me. It had never before
occurred to me that when British and Commonwealth troops were sent from England
to fight in Egypt, Greece or Crete, they had first of all to sail on troopships
all the way around the continent of Africa, reaching Egypt via the Red Sea. Now
it seems so obvious – they were avoiding U-Boats and the like in the
Mediterranean. I was also amazed to learn that when the Allied forces first
landed in Athens, Germany was not yet at war with Greece, a German consulate
flying the swastika flag was still operating there, and German consulate staff
freely strolled up and down the quays making notes on the equipment, size and
strength of the disembarking Allied forces – all of which information was
doubtless later of great help to the Nazi forces when they invaded.
Those were two
pieces of factual information that struck me, but more than anything, the
attitudes and personal observations of the author make this book worthwhile. As
a New Zealander who had never been overseas before the war, Elworthy was both
surprised and shocked at the class-bound and hierarchical nature of English
society when he went through advanced training in England. As a typical
anecdote, he notes:
“Every so often we would be reminded how
different England was from New Zealand. There was a street in Charing, about
200 yards long, running up a hill and serving a lot of new houses. It was
signposted as a private road and the people living there had placed a sign at
the entrance saying ‘Tradesmen’s vehicles are NOT permitted in this street’.
The butcher, baker, milkman and coalman had to park their vans and carry
everything up the hill to the houses. Although a German invasion was a real
possibility, the people from this street petitioned the War Office and demanded
that all troops around Charing stay clear of the vicinity as the noise of the
vehicles passing by disturbed them. In one incident one of my drivers who was
towing a truck was approached by a resident, who pointed out that he was
encroaching on a private road. The resident took extreme exception to the
number of times my driver called him a ‘so-and-so bastard’ in the ensuing
conversation. He assured us that he had never before in his life been addressed
in such a manner and we would hear from his solicitors. We never did, of
course, but we felt if this was England it was a pity we hadn’t known before we
came over to fight and defend it.” (p.23)
These are not
the words of a larrikin soldier with no respect for order or rank, but of an
egalitarian Kiwi. Elworthy was a very responsible soldier and knew how
necessary rank and order were in warfare. For this very reason, you can sense
his rage at the total disorganised messes that the retreat through Greece and
(even more) the retreat across the Cretan mountains became. Soldiers
panicked. Soldiers threw away necessary
kit when they still had a fighting chance. On Crete, says Elworthy, “As I walked I picked up bits of kit that had
been thrown away; soon I had collected all the clothing I needed to replace
what I had lost or had thrown away when we were evacuating from Greece.”
(p.69)
He is shocked at
officers who don’t do their duty or desert their men, soldiers who rapidly turn
to looting and theft, men who steal the identity of others in order to be first
on the evacuation boats, and so on. Always, there is the anger of the professional
at the shambles being made by men who should have known better. He does not
dwell on it, but it is clear that he would like to say harsh words about
Freyberg and his senior staff who flew off as soon as the Allied surrender on
Crete was announced, and thus left the bulk of their men to the Germans.
Elworthy judges
the Germans by their soldiership. Once captured, he is surprised at how well he
and fellow prisoners are treated by German front-line troops. But the horrors
begin once they are in the hands of camp-guards and others in Germany whom
Elworthy sees as, at best, second-rate soldiers not fit for combat duty and
therefore taking out their aggression and frustration on prisoners. As for the
prisoners – they are not a band of brothers loyal to one another. Even allowing
for the stool pigeons and spies among them, there are criminal gangs of
prisoners who make it their business to intimidate other prisoners, steal their
rations, get the lighter work duties and so on.
In both the
retreat sections (I won’t call them combat sections – Elworthy never had the
chance to shoot at enemy soldiers) and the prison sections, the chief
impression made is one of squalor. This is a war of forced marches, exhaustion,
low rations, hunger, disease, lice – and the annoyance of a professional
soldier who is prevented by circumstances from doing his job properly. Much
that appears in this book would not have been acceptable to wartime censors, at
a time when a more heroic interpretation of the war was necessary for purposes
of public morale.
Elworthy is both
alert to, and duly outraged by, violations of the Geneva Convention. But he is
apparently not too upset that his American comrades, on liberating Dachau,
lined up a number of the SS guards and shot them out of hand. In the
circumstances his attitude is understandable.
This paperback is
a very good piece of book production from Awa Press. The book’s
three generous
sections of photographs have the advantage (not always found in photographic
sections) of presenting only images that are relevant to the tone and matter of
the author’s narrative. The first image is of young Jack Elworthy with his wife
and baby son. The last is of old Jack Elworthy on the day of his retirement in
the 1950s. In between, probably the most endearing image is one of Elworthy, in
the last months of the war, standing in American uniform at the right end of a
line-up of his American buddies. It’s funny how he manages to look both one of
them and out of place at the same
time.
* *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * * *
These are the
diaries of a British officer in the First World War. Charlie May was born in
Dunedin in New Zealand, but having lived in England for some time, he joined an
English “Pals” battalion. “Pals” battalions were one means of making
volunteering more attractive as England built up its “New” Army to add to its
very small professional army. Friends from a certain locality were allowed to
volunteer together and serve in the same units – hence the book’s title To Fight Alongside Friends. The
downside (not dealt with in this book) is that if “Pals” units were hit hard in
battle, a specific locality back in Blighty could find itself deprived of most
of its young manhood. Charlie May was a captain in the 22nd
Manchester Service battalion.
Front line
officers were forbidden, by King’s Regulations, to keep diaries for the obvious
reason that, if they were captured or killed, such diaries could fall into the
hands of the enemy and be gleaned for military information. Charlie May,
however, ignored regulations. He had spent some time as a journalist before
enlisting and had a compulsion to write and record things. He kept his diary in seven small notebooks
which survived his death and were sent back to his family.
The first entry
is in November 1915 before he had embarked for France. The last is early on the
morning of 1 July 1916, the first day of the Battle of the Somme. This day has
become iconic as the day when the British Army suffered more casualties (dead
or wounded) than on any other day in its history. Among common soldiers, with a
less fastidious vocabulary than Charlie May, it became known as “the big
f**k-up”. Charlie May was killed on that day. In his last entry, before going
over the top, he writes in a spirit of exultation, as if he is about to be part
of a great military achievement.
Of course there
is a cruel irony in this ending and, for this reader at least, there is
unintended irony throughout the book. May’s attitudes are, by and large,
conventionally patriotic ones, very much in tune with the times. He hates the
enemy and sees Germany as being entirely responsible for the war, writing on 13
January 1916: “Curse the Kaiser, say I,
and all similar tyrants who bring war and misery and devastation upon the
world?” (p.69). He is mildly amused by those near the front, such as the
padre, who do not have a military spirit and who are not like the common
soldiery. “Parson Wood came in to tea,”
he writes on 13 April 1916, “He is a
somewhat dolorous person but means well, works harder and is I fully believe a
most Christian man. He thinks us a sad lot of rogues and I have no doubt is
justified according to his lights.” (p.153)
When he looks in
the face of horror, he still sees it in the light of enemy barbarity and the
gallantry of his fellow English soldiers. Consider his vocabulary in the
following entry, from 3 June 1916. May has just returned to the front line from
leave, and sees the bodies of dead comrades hanging over German barbed wire on
the other side of No Man’s Land. The German is a very devil, whereas the dead
English soldiers have made the “Supreme Sacrifice”. The entry reads thus:
“We are in the line again, but it is a sad
incoming. Poor Street, Cansino and one other unidentified can be plainly seen
tangled in a heap among the German wire, right under their parapet. A Boche
sentry is mounted over them and keeps popping his head up every now and then to
have a look at them. I saw him first through the telescope and the sudden
apparition of his great face caused me to think him a fiend of hell gloating
over his victims. The poor fellows are quite dead. It is evident now that
Cansino, hearing Street was in difficulties, went to help him and was killed in
the attempt. It is one more case of the Supreme Sacrifice. The boy did well.”
(p.190)
Where is the
irony in this? Simply in subsequent history, which has made Charlie May’s
sincere convictions and worldview seem woefully antique. We simply cannot look
at war now as he did.
I do not think
that To Fight Alongside Friends is a book
to give startling new insights into the First World War, nor even to give us a
vivid sense of what happened to one soldier. But as the expression of attitudes
that once powered millions of men, it is an interesting historical document.
No comments:
Post a Comment