We feature each week Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books
“HUNTING ELEPHANTS” by Peter Bland (Steele
Roberts, $19:99); “THE LONELY NUDE” by Emily Dobson (Victoria University Press,
$25)
Early in 2013 I
had the pleasure and privilege of reviewing on this blog Peter Bland’s Collected
Poems 1956-2011 [look it up on the index at right], and I took the
opportunity then to say a number of things about Bland’s place in NZ Lit and
culture – the co-founder of Downstage Theatre; the ebullient actor and
director; the Pom who came to New Zealand in the 1950s, returned to England and
came back to New Zealand a number of times before finally settling here
permanently; and above all the man who observed New Zealand closely, but
without joining the “nationalist” poetic fashions of his early days in this
country.
Bland’s poetry
showed that he knew what life was like in New Zealand alright - but he had
enough detachment to see it in the greater cosmopolitan frame. Reviewing
Bland’s last separate collection Coming
Ashore for the
Listener, I noted
that Bland’s themes were consistent ones, but he was now more aware of his age.
This is even
more true of his latest collection Hunting
Elephants, fifty pages of pithy poems. I love a man who, now at the age of
80, can still wield imagery like a scalpel, can be surreal and playful, can be
wistful without self-pity even if he has quite clearly heard the chimes at
midnight. This is a book filled with references to a possible paradise, with
memories, with dreams, and even with the odd tentative speculation that there
might actually be something beyond death.
In many of these
poems I detect a “gander without a goose” (to adapt James K. Baxter’s phrase)
as Peter Bland recalls his late wife Beryl, to whom he dedicates one sequence
of poems. There is “a moon worn out with
loneliness” (in the poem ‘The outer
courts of paradise’). There is a dreamy desire to ride elephants to paradise (‘Hunting
elephants’) and the triptych to Beryl where he wishes he could “leave the road ahead / to look after itself
/ and loll like caliphs / in our noonday bed.” (‘Afterlife’). He still hums
tunes that “she” taught him to hum “a
lifetime ago” (‘Ripe Pears’). He hankers after “my co-pilot, my loyal companion” in “the house that is a lonely spaceship” (‘Spaceship’). He meets his
wife in a dream (in the prose poem ‘There you are’).
So being a
widower, and an old widower, looms large in the Bland-osphere. But old age
itself, and its consolations as well as its weaknesses, is as much Bland’s
territory.
There are poems
about being a ‘Homebody’ and the pleasure of doing nothing and a poem about
watching ‘Porn’ (poor old beggar) and a dream about Baxter where “I remember how / it was always sex / or the
sacred / that brought him / /to his knees.” (‘Discovering Jim Baxter…’) and
about getting used to living in a silent house with memories (‘Holding It Together’)
and a prose poem called ‘Locality’ about how Dominion Road can itself be
constructed as a poem. He also reflects that, at an older age, daydreams are
things that can only be imagined, not lived (‘Idylls’). I wonder if the
‘Scarecrow’ (“wearing Mum’s old hat”)
is a portrait of the poet as inanimate object, growing older and more battered
as he moves from scene to scene.
When he comes to
poems about art, Bland is concerned with the artist’s intention and his
technique – questioning both, whether it be Cezanne seeing nature as the same
in its changeability (‘Cezanne’s Apples’) or a still-life teasing the viewing
by its absences (‘An infinite meantime’)
Five poems
feature the familiar Mr Maui, but the one called ‘Mr Maui among the archetypes’
turns him to Bland’s new purpose of celebrating or lamenting or regarding
quizzically the phenomenon of being old; for among the archetypes “My / favourite’s an old man / trying to be
holy / while surrounded by devils / and naked nymphs. You have / to laugh, he’s
so far / past it…”
It occurs to me
that in this sad excuse for a review, I have banged away at the poet’s age. I
wouldn’t deny that this is an old man’s book, but I do not mean that in a
negative and demeaning sense. I am not saying that Bland is producing the same
old same old – only that the poet knows his own most fruitful subject matter.
And I also note that Bland is still capable of springing surprises that seem
quite out of character. Consider in this volume his version of Villon’s
‘L’Epitaphe’. The original is a ballade in three stately stanzas with an Envoi
at the end. Bland (who works mainly in free verse or prose poems) transforms it
into 12 couplets, colloquial and spare and yet still giving that medieval
starkness in its account of the hanged awaiting God’s judgment. He calls it
‘Ballad of the hanged men’ and it is one of the best things in the book.
* *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
If Peter Bland
is a poet in very late career, Emily Dobson is still almost a starter. The Lonely Nude is her second
collection.
Is it because I
am male that I found the poem which appeals most to me in this volume to be
‘Construction man’? It reads, in its entirety:
“I’d like to be
on a roof today too,
like you –
construction man –
with a white hard hat,
a hammer
and a measuring tape.”
What do I like
about this simple and effective poem?
Its desire for
certainty and its sense of a solidity, which I find to contrast with much of
the content of The Lonely Nude. Also
its sense of weighing and measuring the visible world.
In different
sections, Emily Dobson touches on her experience as a nude model for art
students, her travels in Mexico and the United States, the seasons and her
eventual return home where (to quote another poem – ‘The fig at home’ – in its
entirety):
“The fig at home
always dropped its fruit
too soon”
With all the
wealth of sensual experience her travels would presumably entail, however,
Dobson writes in such a spare style that her brief poems become almost cryptic.
What is being said? I am not sure. There is a kind of detachment from physical
reality. In this, I am not wilfully misrepresenting this collection. Breaking a
long habit, I quote the VUP blurb, which tells me that “even as she travels into the world, [she] feels increasingly disconnected from it”. Quite so. The only
literary comparison that comes readily to hand for me are those passages of Mrs Dalloway where Virginia Woolf has
her main character look at London and suddenly find it insubstantial,
incorporeal, as if it is floating and not solid reality. The style is so
cerebrotonic that it washes physicality out.
I am sure this
is a genuine worldview for many people, but (except in the odd moment of
detachment) it is not one that I can share easily.
It is, however,
quite wrong to judge literature solely in terms of one’s sympathy for its worldview.
There is an audience for Dobson’s pithiness and floating, incorporeal
consciousness.
No comments:
Post a Comment