We feature each week Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books
“CHILDHOODS – Growing Up in Aotearoa New Zealand” edited by
Nancy Higgins and Claire Freeman (Otago University Press, $NZ50); “PACIFIC
IDENTITIES AND WELLBEING: Cross-Cultural Perspectives” edited by Margaret
Nelson Agee, Tracey McIntosh, Philip Cuthbertson and Cabrini ‘Ofa Makasiale
(Otago University Press, $45)
Even when
the contributions are lucid and well-written, it is often difficult assessing
symposia, or books of academic essays. Each essay will present the results of
research, or argue a viewpoint, that deserves close analysis on its own.
Summarising the whole book inevitably seems cursory, unless the review is to
grow to unwieldy length. Bearing this in mind, I have recently made my way
through two collections of academic essays, and here present my inadequate
report:
Edited by independent researcher
Nancy Higgins, and Otago’s Associate-Professor of Geography Claire Freeman, Childhoods – Growing Up in Aotearoa New
Zealand offers nineteen specialised chapters on aspects on childhood in New
Zealand. The nineteen chapters are written by 26 contributors. (I note in
passing that only 2 of the 26 contributors are male, which clearly says
something about which sex is predominantly involved in both childcare and
research into children). Higgins and Freeman divide the essays into three
parts.
The first five chapters are “The
Context” of New Zealand childhood, setting out the parameters of these studies,
comprising discussions of what sort of country New Zealand is (part of this
exposition seems written for overseas readers), what theories influence the
study of childhood, how the physical environment of New Zealand children has
changed, and the ethics involved in research into childhood. It is in this section
that there is much reference to the “agency” of children – that is, to the
concept that children are autonomous persons in and of themselves, and
therefore not to be talked of solely in terms of their vulnerability. As the
introduction tells us (p.15) the book was initiated by the University of
Otago’s Children and Young People as Social Actors Research Cluster.
The next eight chapters (Chapters
8 to 13) are a diverse bunch, and are therefore fittingly called “Experiencing
Diverse Childhoods”. They range from an analysis (by Helen May) of how
different from today New Zealand’s elementary schools were in the early 20th
century; to a piece of sincere advocacy (by Anita Gibbs) on the needs of
adopted and fostered children. There are also chapters on the special positions
of disabled Maori children, the role of children in family law and the paid
work that is done by young people.
It is the third section - the last six chapters of the book –
“Children and Young People’s Voices” that could have some of the collection’s
most provocative material. This is where the essayists and researchers deal
more with marginalised children – among others, the children of prisoners
(Julie Lawrence); gay and lesbian students at high school (Kathleen Quinlivan);
and Maori students facing barriers to getting into work (Moana Mitchell and
Hazel Phillips). True to the section’s heading, these and the other chapters in
this final section draw extensively on the testimony of children and young
people themselves. There is (as there always is in such circumstances)
sometimes a tension between the children’s comments and the interpretations
given to them. [I noted this same
problem in my review on this blog of Children
of Rogernomics, which you can find via the index at right. The earlier book
is sometimes referenced in Childhoods.]
Now that I have given you an
inadequate overview, how do I react to this volume?
The very opening sentences of
Professor Keith Ballard’s foreword say “This
is a book about children. It will be of value to parents, family, whanau,
professionals and any combination of these.”(p.7) Possibly. As the parent of a
larger-than-average family, I have an interest in the raising of children and
in childcare, but I am not sure that this is really a book for parents.
It is more a book for
professionals.
It is also a book which, despite
the diverse interests of its contributors, runs to a general philosophy. There
is an awareness that “in Aotearoa New
Zealand we have some of the worst levels of child poverty and child health in
the OECD” (Ballard, p.8) and that “the serious decline in Maori well-being
[in the years since neo-liberalism kicked in] reflected a ‘racialised social order’ of economic and health inequality.”
(Ballard, p.9). This strain of thought is developed in Freeman and Higgins’
introduction, which says: “Aotearoa New
Zealand’s neo-liberal economy is not conducive to maintaining support for the
most vulnerable children in society, given its emphasis on individualism and
economic matters rather than on social welfare.” (p.24) Later, in Anna
B.Smith’s essay, it is noted that in some official reports on children “lip service only is given to children’s
agency, while their vulnerability and need for protection [are] given much more
prominence”. (p.34).
What we have, then, is a book that is
ideologically loaded as much as it is the product of research. Please let me
make it clear that I do not necessarily disagree with the editors’ and
contributors’ ideology. Probably the fallout from neo-liberalism has been bad
for many New Zealand children. Probably there are various strains of racism at
play.
Even so, the presuppositions must
be noted, and there are some that are debateable.
It is one thing to assert, as the
introduction does, that New Zealand is “bicultural”, which in terms of one
founding document and some subsequent legislation does appear to be the case.
But then as much evidence is adduced in later chapters to show that
“multicultural” would be a more apt term for large areas of the country. Likewise,
it is excellent to emphasize, as so many contributors do, that children are
complete human beings in themselves, and not just adults in the making. But any
discussion about their “agency” has to be circumscribed with an understanding
that their powers to consciously choose are limited and in many cases still
moulded by adults. Anna B.Smith speaks of one researcher who “described how teachers can invite children
to take an agentive role by embedding them in narratives that put them in the
role of agents.” (p.39) The paradox here is that it is the teachers who are
taking the initiative in this matter – not a result of children’s agency. And
this is a matter that lurks beneath some of my discontent with part of this
volume. Does emphasising “agency” actually mean subjecting children to new
rules and theories imposed by teachers and government agencies as opposed to
norms imposed by parents? Just a rebellious thought on my part.
What I could continue to
contribute here would, however, largely be niggles. While aware of the implicit
ideology, I was informed by much of this book. I am very grateful that in all
the contributors, there are only very occasional lapses into sociological
jargon. Although it is primarily a book for professionals, it is not incomprehensible.
I took delight in the chapter (by Christina Ergler, Robin Kearns and Karen
Witten) on the different ways in which children’s games have been “managed”
over the last century. And I note that it is a handsome piece of book
production, unusually reproducing photos in colour within the text.
Enough said.
* *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* * *
* *
When I open Pacific Identities and Well-being, I am entering territory that is
inevitably far more alien to me than a general survey of New Zealand
childhoods. Pacific Identities and
Well-being is a collection about mental health as it impacts upon
Polynesians in New Zealand, both Pasifika and Maori. More than twenty
contributors wrote its eighteen chapters, which the editors have divided into
four sections thus:
A section dealing with the whole
question of cultural identity, both in terms of how much Polynesians are
moulded by their inherited cultures in their lives in New Zealand, and how they
relate to the larger, non-Polynesian society.
A section dealing with
therapeutic practice in counselling Polynesians, being largely advocacy for
cultural awareness in counselling and the continued relevance of traditional
perceptions.
A section on death and dying in
Pacific culture. Interestingly, three of the four essays in this section are
specifically about New Zealand Maori and tangihanga.
And finally a section on
responsive practice in terms of counselling that actually meets the needs of
the (Polynesian) counselled.
There are two matters that make
this collection quite distinct from comparable studies of mental health issues
written by Palagi. First, there is an open and unabashed acknowledgement of
spirituality in the healing process. Two of the editors have religious
affiliations – Philip Cutherbertson lectures in theology at the University of
Auckland, and Cabrini ‘Ofe Makasioale is a Catholic sister who works as
counsellor and psychotherapist. The collection ends with an “epilogue”, by the
Presbyterian minister Mua Strickson-Pua, on the value and power of comedy in
Polynesian contexts, including free-form poetry with the damning lines “Palagi theologians / you have crucified
comedy / sanitising creation with that mythology / for theology of comedy God
is not funny / we shall never ever laugh again / or dare even to smile in
public / rather some prefer a sombre theology / where the rock has not been
rolled away / and we must mourn Easter forever…” (p.291)
There is absolutely nothing naïve
in this attention to spirituality. Apart from reflecting the comparatively
larger role of religion in Polynesian cultures (as opposed to European ones),
the authors acknowledge openly some of the paradoxes of religious influence.
For example, Chapter 8 (“On values and spirituality in trauma counselling”)
addresses issue of sexual violence “in
both church and community settings” (p.146) and considers how spirituality
may be misused to cover up sexual abuse.
As will be implicit in some of
the above, the other matter which makes this volume distinctive is the degree
to which it calls upon imaginative responses as much as upon research-based
responses. Each section is introduced with poetry, some written by Tracey
Tawhiao and Serie Barford, but most written by the gifted Selina Tusitala Marsh
whose volume Dark Sparring (Auckland
University Press) I have recently had the pleasure of reviewing for Poetry New Zealand. In a manner of
speaking, the poetry expresses the raw emotions, often of grief and loss, to
which the essayists turn their analytic attention. And yet some of the
essayists are also in imaginative (by which I do not mean falsifying) mode.
Teena Brown Pulu’s examination of cultural identity reads, she says (p.85) “more like an autobiographical novel” and
has the distinctly stroppy title “The lazy native’s quitting the daytime job.
Going home to the village. Yeah, right.”
Sorry for posting off topic, but just wanted to say hello to Mr Reid who was my history teacher at Marcellin long ago (1984, if memory serves). He was always frustrated with my ability to parlay five facts into three essays, but it was good training for a career in fiction, editing and screenwriting.
ReplyDeleteAnd hello to you too David-of-long-ago. Yes I do remember you. Now be a good boy and post on this link to as many literati as you know..
Delete