[NOTICE TO READERS: For over four years, Reid's Reader has been presenting an entirely free service to readers with commentary on books new and old. Reid's Reader
receives no grants or subsidies and is produced each week in many hours
of unpaid work. If you wish to contribute, on an entirely voluntary
basis, to the upkeep of this blog, we would be very grateful if you made
a donation via the PayPal "DONATE" button that now appears at the top
of the index at right. Thank you.]
We feature each week Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.
We feature each week Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.
“JAMES HECTOR –
Explorer, Scientist, Leader” by Simon Nathan (Geoscience Society of New
Zealand, distributed by Potton and Burton $NZ45)
The photograph
on the cover of Simon Nathan’s James
Hector – Explorer, Scientist, Leader is very striking and has often been
reproduced. Taken in about 1874, it shows James Hector and his staff at the
Colonial Museum, in Wellington, gathered around the skeleton of a pygmy right
whale. It’s a very evocative photograph, with most of the ten males in view (but
not Hector) be-hatted and still looking somewhat formal as they pursue the
natural sciences. At once we get a whiff of an exciting age for science, when
it was still practised as much by enthusiastic amateurs as by professionals,
and when the professionals didn’t hesitate to explore more than one branch of
science.
But it might
have been a mistake to choose this striking image for the cover. James Hector
is now remembered mainly for giving his name to the small Hector’s dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori), which has led
some to assume that Hector was primarily a naturalist. The cover could
reinforce this view. In fact, as Simon Nathan’s sprightly and readable
biography makes clear, while Hector did make contributions to botany, zoology,
astronomy and other sciences, he was always, by both training and interest,
primarily a geologist.
The publication
of James Hector – Explorer, Scientist,
Leader is timed for the 150th anniversary of Hector’s becoming
(in 1865) the first professional scientist employed by the New Zealand government.
As Nathan says in his introduction, this is not a book for specialists, but is
deliberately “a relatively short
biography, concentrating on the main events in Hector’s life and his place in
late nineteenth-century New Zealand”(p.12). In other words, the target
audience is the general, non-scientist reader, like this reviewer. The book’s
240-odd pages of texts are extensively illustrated, and many of the
illustrations are reproductions of Hector’s own sketches of land which he
explored and surveyed. It is clear that, along with his other accomplishments,
Hector had considerable artistic skills.
One of the book’s many pleasures consists of comparing, on p.60,
Hector’s sober sketch of Milford sound with the more dramatic and stylised image,
made from the same viewpoint, by Hector’s fellow-scientist, the artist John
Buchanan.
So who was this
James Hector and why should we remember him?
Scots-born James
Hector (1834-1907) was the man who, in the later nineteenth century, came to
dominate science in New Zealand as both an administrator and the editor of
scientific journals. One historian of New Zealand science refers to the years
from 1865 to 1903 as the “Hector hegemony”
(p.10). When Hector became Chancellor of the University of New Zealand, a
Wellington newspaper referred to him as “a
man who knows everything” (p.12). In his time he had been the head of New
Zealand’s first Geological Survey, conductor and supervisor of the Colonial
Museum, the Colonial (now Wellington) Botanical Gardens, the Colonial
Observatory, and the New Zealand Institute which he was instrumental in
founding and whose voluminous Transactions
he edited. He was knighted in 1887. It is interesting to learn that when the
young Scot took his degree at the University of Edinburgh, the only way to gain
entry into scientific studies was to qualify first in medicine – so Hector was
also a doctor of medicine as well as a geologist.
This extra skill
came in handy to him on a number of occasions. To be a geologist in the field
was evidently a perilous business in the nineteenth century, when geological
parties ventured into the wilderness far beyond lines of communication.
Young Hector’s
first venture outside Scotland was as part of a geological survey of what we
would now call western Canada (it was then still called British North America).
Led by John Palliser, the expedition was tasked to survey the Canadian Rockies
with the aim of finding a suitable pass over which a railway could be built to
the Pacific coast. At one point in the journey, a pack-horse panicked at a
river crossing and kicked Hector in the chest, throwing him to the ground where
he was knocked so deeply unconscious that his companions thought he was dead.
They began digging his grave and ceased only when feeble groans told them he
was still alive. Hector himself had to direct the others on how to care for him
in his wounded state. The geologists immediately called the river where the
incident happened Kicking Horse River and the pass they were surveying Kicking
Horse Pass. The names are still used. They are names which many visitors
probably assume were invented by Native Americans.
Before he was
30, on the back of his scientific report on this Canadian expedition, Hector
was elected to both the Royal Geological Society and the Royal Geographical Society.
Later in this
book, Simon Nathan gives other examples of serious mishaps Hector had to
endure. Hector first came to New Zealand in 1862, commissioned by the Otago
provincial government to do a systematic geological survey of the province.
Part of his brief was to find a pass to the west coast through Fiordland. (At
this time, the Otago provincial government still dreamed of having access for
exports to a port on the Tasman Sea). On an exploration of Fiordland aboard the
Matilda Hayes in 1863:
“attempts to leave Chalky Inlet for Dusky
Sound were thwarted by bad weather. In one incident the ship rolled
unexpectedly and the main boom struck Hector, dislocating his left shoulder
joint. He recorded briefly in his journal that he managed to reset it with the
aid of a seaman who had suffered a similar mishap – undoubtedly an agonising
process – and he was partly disabled with his arm in a sling for several weeks.
It was an injury which was to trouble him in later years.” (p.57)
Later still
(Chapter 5) there is the story of Hector having to take a long journey overland,
through the trackless mountains, to get help when a ship on which he was
travelling with Governor Bowen hit a rock and was in danger of sinking.
Perhaps
fortunately for Hector’s health, after he married a wealthy young woman in
1868, he settled down in Wellington and tended more to supervise fieldwork
rather than participate in it.
If the physical
hardships of working geologists make one implicit theme in this book, another
is the developing state of science in the Victorian age. Innovator though he
was in many ways, Hector could be quite conservative in others. Hector took a
long time to accept that there had been extensive prehistoric glaciation (in
ice ages) shaping the land and carrying boulders to incongruous places. In this
matter, he was behind the man who became his great rival in New Zealand
science, Julius Haast.
Where there are differences in scientific
thought, there are often rivalries between scientists. Hector’s relationship
with Haast began cordially enough. Unbeknown to each other, they were both
engaged at the same time in the fruitless task of trying to find a pass through
Fiordland (Hector’s party working from Otago and Haast’s from South
Canterbury). Haast became the big scientific identity in Christchurch at the
same time that Hector was establishing himself in Dunedin. It was Hector,
however, who won the government’s nod of approval when they wanted the
administration of scientific endeavour to be centralised in Wellington.
The sharpest
exchanges between the two men came in the “Sumner Cave Controversy”, centring
on moa bones found at the site. Haast insisted that moa had been rendered
extinct by an ancient race far predating Maori. Hector and some of his
associates took the view (still supported by scientific orthodoxy) that moa
were indeed rendered extinct by Maori in relatively recent times. Haast’s anger
over this difference was fired by his suspicion that one of his subordinates in
the exploration of the cave, Alexander McKay, had been encouraged by Hector to
undermine Haast’s views in public.
Simon Nathan
judges Haast to have been a more volatile and flamboyant figure than the quiet
and methodical Hector, and notes that until very recently it was Haast who
gained the attention of biographers rather than Hector. In his summary, he says
“Perhaps the main reason for Hector’s
supposed anonymity is the fact that he lacked obvious character defects. There is not a whiff of scandal associated
with his name. He appears to have been a genuinely nice person, respected and
liked by most. Being ambitious, he achieved his dominance in late nineteenth
century science largely by hard work and obvious competence, aided by the lack
of scientific rivals in Wellington, the seat of government, who could challenge
him.” (p.233)
This seems a
just judgment.
In some obvious
ways, we can see that Hector was a man of his times – a Victorian. On one
journey:
“Hector and his crew were embarrassed by what
they felt was the inadequate dress of the Maori family. Once the Matilda
Hayes was secured on the lower Hollyford River, Hector instructed the crew
to unpack some old tents and make skirts for the women.” (p.58)
Later, Hector
was called up to give his views on an industrial dispute on the west coast, and
to write a report on the Brunner mining disaster. In both cases, his attitudes
seemed to show him siding with management and the bosses, and therefore against
the miners. By the 1880s he was, as Nathan says, an “establishment” figure.
At the same
time, Hector represents the collaborative nature of scientific research, often
corresponding with, endorsing and sometimes collaborating with such figures as
the ornithologist Walter Buller, the director of Kew Gardens in London, Joseph
Hooker, and talented scientific amateurs like the missionaries Richard Davis
and William Colenso. There is also the polymath nature of his work. He used the
expanding telegraph network to help establish the reliable recording of the
intensity of earthquakes, and to set up a system of meteorological reporting.
His interest in fossils and in ornithology led him to do much work as a
naturalist. He set up a temporary observatory to write a report on a transit of
Venus. But it was his grounding in geology that led him to be commissioned to
look for gold reefs in the North Island; and inevitably it was to Hector that
the government turned when it needed a scientific report on the eruption of
Tarawera in 1886.
James Hector – Explorer, Scientist, Leader does give some details of Hector’s domestic life – a long and happy
marriage with many children; the family home which was for years in the house
attached to the Colonial Museum in Wellington, before the Hectors moved out to
a house in the Hutt valley; the death by appendicitis of Hector’s most promising
academic son, when the elderly Hector was on a return visit to Canada.
But the book’s
focus is on the scientist and his achievements. As Simon Nathan remarks, a
“generalist” like Hector tends to be underrated or even dismissed as a dabbler
in our own times, when scientific specialisation reigns. But you cannot close James Hector – Explorer, Scientist, Leader
without feeling at least some envy for a time when one man could embrace with
enthusiasm so many branches of science, and contribute fruitfully to many of
them.
No comments:
Post a Comment