Nicholas
Reid reflects in essay form on general matters and ideas related to
literature, history, popular culture and the arts, or just life in general. You are free to agree
or disagree with him.
UNLAID GHOSTS
I have never pretended to be an
expert on things German. I cannot speak German, apart from understanding a few
scattered phrases thanks to long ago doing two papers in German as part of an
undergraduate degree. I visited Germany in childhood as part of a general
European tour, spending a few weeks with my parents and elder siblings,
travelling south from Hamburg down through Hanover and the Rhineland to
Austria. But that was so long ago that I can hardly reconstruct memories of the
trip – and they would be childish impressions anyway. Most of what I know of
the country comes from reading books and seeing movies.
So it would be pretentious and
silly of me to make sweeping statements about Germany based on a recent three-night
stay in Hamburg with friends, who were also generous hosts. But I did have some
of my preconceptions overturned in that very short time.
In the first place, I was
surprised by the beauty of Hamburg itself. For some reason I
imagined it as a
dingy industrial seaport, smoky, dirty and noisy. Doubtless there are parts of
Hamburg that are like that, as there are in any modern city. But my chief
discovery was of how green, clean and open the city was. Maybe I was influenced
by the very salubrious suburb where my friends live. But riding by rail from
suburb to central city, we were passing well-appointed garden allotments, tidy
blocks of flats and much greenery. The impression was reinforced by going to
the top of the tall former water tower (now an observatory) in the city’s major
park and getting a panoramic view in all directions across the great North
German Plain – flat as a pancake and green in all directions. To the west,
there was a little bump of a hill, which seemed to be the highest natural
feature for many hundreds of square miles. But my host pointed out that it was
not a natural feature at all. It consisted of thousands of square metres of
rubble that had been hauled away from the city after the Second World War, when
Hamburg was repeatedly bombed, and piled in one place as the foundation for an
artificial hill.
The old quarter of the city, with
its preserved shopping arcade from the nineteenth century and its old Rathaus
and other historic buildings around the artificial lakes on the River Alster,
reinforces this impression of a city made for civilised living rather than for pounding
machinery. So do the new building projects near the port, with gleaming modern
architecture replacing antique berths for smoky ships. Walking through the
working-class area of St Pauli, I saw the odd specimen of spray-painted
graffiti; but I was amazed at how neat, tidy and generally un-graffiti-bombed
it was (unlike working class areas in other European cities). My host told me
that its apartments are permanently rent-controlled by a Social Democrat local
authority, so that it has not been taken over by the middle class and
“gentrified”, as inner-city working class areas in so many cities have
been. It
was only after leaving Hamburg that I discovered it was named Europe’s “Green
Capital” in 2011.
On top of this, there was the
feast of high culture to which our hosts treated us or directed us. An
excellent production of Borodin’s Prince
Igor at the Staatsoper. A performance, in the preserved nineteenth century
concert hall, of orchestral works by Carl Phillip Emanuel Bach and of Robert
Schumann’s Rhenish Symphony under the baton of Christian Zacharias. Not to
mention a visit to C.P.E.Bach’s grave in the crypt of the great Lutheran
Michelskirche (St Michael’s church) and an admiring look at a monument to
Brahms (Hamburg-born even if he made his musical career in other parts of the
German-speaking world).
I appreciate that by this stage I
am sounding like a gushy tourist brochure. I do apologise for this, but Hamburg
was really an enjoyable experience and it was good to find a city quite unlike
by imaginings.
But you are an habitual reader of
this blog and you know that I wouldn’t write about
some place I had visited
without attaching a moral of some sort, and here it comes – complete with a
reminder that I disclaim any profound knowledge of Germany.
The point is, you cannot be even
in this lovely city of Hamburg without being reminded of the negative side of
German history.
We walk through the beautiful
square in front of the Wilhelmine Rathaus, with half an eye on the kayaking regatta
going on, on the Alster lake. And we pass the monolithic First World War
memorial. It says “Forty thousand sons of this city gave their lives for you, 1914-1918”.
A reasonable sentiment for a war memorial. But a modern plaque at the base of
the monument designates it a “Memorial to the Fallen in both World Wars” and
tells us this sad story – when the memorial was raised in the 1920s, one side
has a relief designed by Ernst Barlach,
showing a grieving mother embracing her
son. When the Nazis came to power, they saw this image as too “pacifistic”, so
they erased it and replaced it with a patriotic German eagle. The grieving
mother and son have now been restored. Clearly, war memorials can be used by
those who wish to glorify war as much as those who wish to lament.
We pass over to the other side of
the square. Again, there is a sad reminder of something. A
not-quite-representational modern statue of Heinrich Heine, Germany’s greatest
poet of the 19th century, stands there. (Heine’s mortal remains lie
in the Montmartre cemetery in Paris, where we had visited them a few weeks earlier). Again, a modern plaque tells us that an
older statue of Heine was raised here in 1926, but it was torn down by the
Nazis and Heine’s books were among those that were burnt. This was because of
the embarrassing fact that
Germany’s greatest 19th century poet was
Jewish.
On the same day, leaving the
square, we go to what remains of the once great Lutheran church of St Nicholas,
larger than most cathedrals. It was bombed to smithereens by the RAF in the
Second World War, so that all that remains is the spire, and parts of one of
the old entrances. Next to these fragments, there has been planted a “peace
garden”. The great church was built in the nineteenth century in the “Gothic
revival” style that was popularised in England, and was in fact designed by a
team of English architects. So British planes destroyed a British work of art
– which is not the greatest tragedy of a war that destroyed far greater things
than that, but which is horribly ironic anyway.
Perhaps you can see by now what I
(protesting the brevity of my visit; admitting my
lack of knowledge of Germany)
am driving at.
Over seventy years after the
Second World War, Germany is still haunted by the wrong sort of history.
I do not know how young Germans,
who had no part in the sins of their grandparents, think about this. But I do
know that when my wife asked conversationally whether it was yet safe to joke
about the war, our host gave us a polite “Not really”. In fact, as he and I had
been ambling around the city’s great park on a fine Sunday morning, he had been
answering my own inane questions of how the Germans saw the past. He opined
that even now, for Germans, most of the twentieth century is seen as a great
and horrible tragedy, leading to the destruction of what Germany at her best
could have been. There is an awareness that aspects of German history, which
could be seen as quite innocent if they were parts of another nation’s history,
can now be seen only as precursors to something indefensible. In other words,
regardless of the guilt of specific individuals, there is still the residue of
a national guilt. It doesn’t mean that Germans wake up stressed with guilt every
morning, but it does mean that jangling in the background somewhere there is
the sense that something is not right with the nation’s history.
And that is as far as I want to
push this reflection before I start getting sententious and claiming to greater
knowledge of the subject than I possess.
No comments:
Post a Comment