-->

Monday, April 20, 2026

Something New

 We feature each fortnight Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.      

           “A FAR-FLUNG LIFE” by  M.L STEDMAN (Penguin, $NZ38:00)

M. L. Stedman  [Margo Stedman] is an Australian born and raised in West Australia, but has also spent much of her life in England. Apparently, according to one source, she is “totally reticent sharing personal information”. She made a hit with her first novel The Light Between Oceans, which I have not read. Now comes A Far-Flung Life, the title referring to both the distance between farms in the arid part of West Australia and the fact that many people in the story come from different parts of Australia… and some Pommies. Before I get into giving you some sort of synopsis of the tale, I have to make it clear that I am not in any way a snob. I can enjoy a good yarn as much as any reader. I say this because Stedman’s novel is in no way a “masterpiece” [a term constantly abused by promoters of bad movies and novels], but it is very readable and is bound to win a large readership, flaws and all. So here we go.

The MacBride family have lived on a remote sheep station for years – a million acres of dry, harsh ground, average rain per year eight inches.  In January 1958 there is a disaster. Dad [Phil] and sons Warren and Matthew are in a car crash. Dad and Warren die. Matthew [usually called Matt] survives, but he is so badly injured that he has to stay in hospital for months and he has lost much of his ability to remember things. So mother Lorna is left to look after the station, sometimes helped by “Peachey” Pete and Maudy and other friends. Matt returns to the station and being ready to help. Lorna has one daughter, Rose. She is a bit of a tearaway but she straightens-up and helps her mother. And then along comes a dashing English man from a wealthy aristocratic family, Miles Beaumont. Of course Rose falls in love with him, but her romance doesn’t get anywhere. So Rose leaves the station and gets work in Perth. She becomes pregnant. Who was the father? We are not told. She goes back to mother and Matt; and she has her baby. Old Pete Peachy, a dinkum Aussie bloke, helps her to look after the baby. Rose and Lorna think of adopting the baby out, but they change their mind. Alas, Rose becomes depressed. With her infant child , she walks down into a mining pit, fall over, smashes her head and dies. The infant survives. Was it an accident or did she intend suicide? Who knows. The child is called Andy. So we now have a family of Lorna, damaged Matt, and little Andy…

The years go by. We are now well into the 1960’s. There are two big problems. First there is the fact that Australia now needs minerals more than it needs sheep. With the approval of the government, companies are allowed to dig into pits on land that was once used by the pastoralists [i. e. farmers]. Wool is no longer king and for some farmers it is hard times. The MacBride family struggle, even if Matt is now mainly in good health. Second, there is the problem of young Andy. He is an alert kid, and he is interested in family trees… and although he has been told that his mother [Rose] has died, he wants to know who his father was. Matt and ageing Lorna try to dodge the issue.  And it is at this point that we are introduced to Bonny Edquist. She is an alert young woman, with university training, who is a   geologist and has come to find valuable minerals. At first there is animosity between Matt and Bonny, but they gradually get to like each other. And Bonny really likes young Andy and more-or-less becomes his best friend.

And, dear reader, you may think that I have given away the whole plot of this novel. Not true, because [as I have often said] I never give away the endings of new novels. I have given you only the first half of the story. A Far-Flung Life is fully 436 pages long and it moves the characters through to the point where Andy is an adult and more characters are introduced, with the likes of the thoughtful police officer, and the band of local thugs who beat up a queer man, and the women who tut-tut about women who get pregnant outside marriage and many others. And yes, eventually we do learn who impregnated Rose.

At the very least, I can say that much of A Far-Flung Life is credible. M. L. Stedman is at her very best in telling us about how farming stations worked and how things changed in Australia once minerals became more important. She has obviously done a great deal of research. The family’s troubles are also credible, including the way the adults try to shield little Andy from knowing what happened to Rose. On the other hand, the character of Bonny Edquist is too good to be true, almost saintly in the way she deals with young Andy. Sorry to say this, but much of this sounds too neat, too sweet, and not like reality… though in fairness the novel ends with an unexpected twist. I enjoyed some of this novel but gradually tired of it as it moved along There seemed to be too much padding. But who am I to give you this negative verdict? A large audience will enjoy it and doubtless it will become a best-seller. Good luck to them.


                                                              M. L. Stedman

 

 

Something Old

                               IN DEFENSE OF LEWIS CARROLL

Now why am I writing about the man who wrote Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass, not to mention Jabberwocky and The Hunting of the Snark? Because he deserves to be defended, that is why. And in due course you will soon see why. But let me first say who he was..

Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (born 1832 – died 1898) was the son of an Anglican parson of conservative views. Young Dodgson held the same views and was quite devout. He went to Oxford where he excelled in mathematics and he became such a great mathematician that for many years he lectured in Maths at Oxford. He wrote many books about mathematics, some of which broke new ground. Dodgson was known to be shy in the way he talked and his lectures were rather dry. He became a deacon, but he never took Holy Orders. But there was another side of him. He got on well with many writers of his day, took poetry and the arts seriously, and he attempted to become an artist. But he decided he was not up to it; so instead he learnt the new art of photography and became a very capable photographer. He had inherited his father’s habit of writing in a whimsical way when dealing with friends and family and also creating puzzles. And when Dodgson decided to write stories intended for children, he wrote under the name Lewis Carroll – a name put together by Latin and other obscure ideas related to his family. But when it came to his books about mathematics he still called himself Charles Lutwidge Dodgson. There is an often-told story – untrue and now long debunked – that Queen Victoria so liked the Alice stories that she asked “Lewis Carroll” to send him another book… and he sent her a mathematical treatise.

Children and young people have different ways of reading the Alice stories. When we were children, my sister hated the Alice books. She said they were just silly and they didn’t make any sense. I had a different view. I liked Alice in Wonderland, [first published in 1865] but some things frighted me. I was particularly worried by the sequence where the horrible Duchess thrusts a baby into Alice’s arms… and after Alice walks for a while the baby turns into a pig and runs away. This shocked me. Could such things happen? [Of course more recent clever-dick reviewers see this as proof that Lewis Carroll liked little girls but hated little boys, saw them as nasty pigs, and the angry Duchess sings “Speak roughly to your little boy, / And beat him when he sneezes, / He only does it to annoy, / Because he knows it teases.”] Later I was almost frightened by the angry queen who kept shouting “Off with her head!” or “Off with his head!”... but by that stage I was used to the rhythm of the story and knew it couldn’t hurt me. And I liked the crazy-ness of it all. Going down the rabbit hole chasing the rabbit. Drinking the potions that expands or diminish Alice. The pool of tears and the ridiculous caucas-race where we meet many birds and beasts including the [extinct] Dodo… who might be there because Lewis Carroll sometimes had a stutter when he addressed himself as Do… Do… Dodgson [although once again this theory has been disputed]. Alice reciting You Are Old, Father William [one of the many poems where Lewis Carroll made satire of “improving” poems for children]. The wonderful Mad Hatter’s Tea Party even if it has the nastiness of the poor Dormouse being stuffed into the teapot… and I particularly liked the appearance of the Cheshire Cat who came and mysteriously disappeared. I have always liked cats and I delighted  in him, setting up enigmas and being as careful as any good cat. [ By the way, the phrase “Cheshire Cat” was not invented by Lewis Carroll. It was a traditional phrase and is quoted in William Makepeace Thackeray’s novel The Newcomes, decades before  Lewis Carroll was using the phase.]

Now I hate to say this, but as a child  I moved on and found myself enjoying Through The Looking-Glass [first published in 1871] even more than Alice in Wonderland. Why? Because it had the best [nonsense] poems that Lewis Carroll ever produced: the magnificent Jabberwocky; The Walrus and the Carpenter as performed by Tweedledum and Tweedledee;  Humpty Dumpty’s attempt to recite a poem about the seasons; the White Knight’s long tale of The Aged, Aged Man… and as for events, well, the flowers and their thoughts, and the rivalry of the White Queen and the Red Queen… and their less aggressive spouses. Might I also note that while children don’t go running down rabbit holes, most children at some point will look at a mirror and wonder why we see things backward – which is the opening of Through The Looking-Glass. We note, too, that both books are built around thoughtful games. Alice in Wonderland has playing cards – and you might remember that that it ends with Alice saying “You’re nothing but a pack of cards”. And Through The Looking-Glass is built around chess, where Alice finally wins the game . Finally, if you read both books you will soon understand that Alice is the most intelligent character, asking questions even if her questions are those of a child. She is dealing with grown-ups who usually say foolish things or whimsical things or confusing things. Unlike most books written for children in the Victorian era, which were meant to be “approving”, Lewis Carroll was deliberately giving children a fantasy in which the adults were the silly and pompous ones. And please note that some of the wonder of the Alice books was gained by the illustrations drawn by Sir John Tenniel. Nobody has ever drawn the Alice books better. 


I could go on about Lewis Carroll’s other works, such as The Hunting of the Snark, which is good fun; and his last two long books for children Sylvie and Bruno, which were an awful flop and did exactly what he had avoided in his earlier books for children - he lectured children about how to be good. I also have on my shelves one of his very last books for children A Tangled Tale… which is really a set of mathematical exercises disguised as stories. No wonder it is now forgotten.

But at last I have to go into the problem of defending Lewis Carroll. For some people he is controversial.

First there is the lesser problem. In 1967, when hippies were around and smoking pot and other drugs, there was a song called White Rabbit sung by a now-forgotten singer calling herself Grace Slick. Alice goes down the rabbit hole and she drinks the potions and she becomes tall and she becomes small and she changes… so it’s obviously about drugs, right? Now it is true that in the 19th century laudanum [derived from opium] was used commonly for everyday things such as head-aches and some people became addicted to it. Could Lewis Carroll have become an addict? Not likely. The expanding-and-diminishing of Alice in Alice in Wonderland has nothing to do with drugs. It was more likely that Lewis Carroll was playing with ideas about size as would be seen by a child – a very mathematical idea.

The greater problem is the belief that Lewis Carroll was somehow a paedophile. There is no evidence of this, but it has been built up by those who think there was something suspicious about his interest in little girls. As a photographer Carroll took many photos of  men and women, but he particularly enjoyed taking photos of girls, child or young adolescent. Indeed he made hundreds of such photos. The Liddell family were happy to have Carroll photograph their young daughters Lorina, Edith and Alice – who became his favourite. It was for these three that Carroll made up stories while taking them in an outing, rowing up the river. But as they grew older, the girls grew out of hearing stories, and the Liddells told Carroll that he could no longer visit them. Was there a scandal? Not at all. What has tarnished Carroll’s memory? Partly the work of psychologists seeing all manner of symbols in his works, and Freudians looking for his weaknesses. Not to mention the sensationalism of rumour. Item – some decades ago there was revealed a naked photo of a young girl purported to be taken by Lewis Carroll. Big sensation for a while … but it turned out to be a fraud.

            There are some scholars who are better than I when it comes to Lewis Carroll.

ITEM: I have on my shelves The Annotated Alice edited by Martin Gardner, published in 1960, which gives the whole texts of the two Alice books, and it scrupulously presents notes on all the jokes that were fully understood in the Victorian era, all the mathematical puzzles that are hidden, all the poems of other poets that Lewis Carroll parodied… and inevitably he does have to deal with Carroll’s relationship with young girls. He does say that Carroll “was a fussy, prim, fastidious, cranky, kind, gentle bachelor whose life was sexless, uneventful and happy”. He also says “books of nonsense fantasy for children are not such fruitful sources of psychoanalytic insight as one might suppose them to be. The symbols have too many explanations.” But his most important statement is this: “There is no indication that Carroll was conscious of anything but the purest innocence in his relations with little girls, nor is there a hint of impropriety in any of the fond recollections that dozens of them later wrote about him. There was a tendency in Victorian England, reflected in the literature of the time, to idealize the beauty and virginal purity of little girls. There is no doubt this made it easier for Carroll to suppose that his fondness for them was on a high spiritual level, though of course this hardly is a sufficient explanation for that fondness. Of late Carroll has been compared with Humbert Humbert, the narrator of Vladimir Nabokov’s novel Lolita. It is true that both had a passion for little girls, but their goals were the exactly opposite. Humbert Humbert’s ‘nymphets’ were creatures to be used carnally. Carroll’s little girls appealed to him precisely because he felt sexually safe with them…”

 

                 Photo of Alice Liddell as taken by Lewis Carroll.

One must also add that Carroll’s younger sisters removed some pages of his journals after he died, not because he had written something about little girls, but because he had flirted with women in their 20’s. This, they thought, was indiscreet. 

ITEM: For the record, I also consulted a pamphlet written by Derek Hudson on Lewis Carroll in the Writers and Their Work series published 1958. He more quaintly said of  Lewis Carroll “From his early youth… he had sought the society of little girls, thus compensating himself, in part, for his inability to form friendships with women of his own age. Children were an escape from sex rather than any sort of conscious satisfaction of it, but they gave him the affection he needed and helped him to fulfil the Platonic and protective love which was characteristic of his nature.” This seems to be the truth.

Really I think that is where the case should end. When he was in his early twenties Lewis Carroll wrote a poem saying “I’d give all wealth that years have piled, / The slow result of Life’s decay, / To be once more a little child / For one bright summer-day.”  In other words, he pined for his own childhood... but he did no harm.

Something Thoughful

   Nicholas Reid reflects in essay form on general matters and ideas related to literature, history, popular culture and the arts, or just life in general. You are free to agree or disagree with him.  

                                                            IT KEEPS HITTING US

 A fortnight ago I wrote a column on this blog about the rain called Weather Makes for Moods, wherein I bemoaned the way that lots of rain makes me housebound. Back in July 2025 I wrote a column called Indubitably Pluvial, which stated that New Zealand is a very rainy country in Autumn and Winter. And of course I often think about the great Cyclone Gabrielle in 2023.  Tiresome person that I am, I am now once again writing about the weather. Why so? Because once again the rain has injured us.

This time we were given clear warning. We knew that another cyclone was coming and it was a big one so we were well prepared. We put our rubbish-bins into the garage so that they would not slide away in the wind as they did back in 2023. We made sure the trampoline was firmly pegged down. We brought inside loose pot-plants and doubly checked the windows. So we waited and waited. Along came a day of rain, annoying all day long and continuing into some of the night, but not being a deluge, just the ordinary Autumn downpour. The road did not overflow. And the following day, Auckland had a bright sunny day. But we knew this was only a prelude, for on the third day it really and relentlessly bucketed down, with the road almost – but not quite - overflowing. But once again there was no real damage.

But please note, I am an Aucklander and there is an odd geographical thing about Auckland. It is built on an isthmus and rain can move across it more quickly over the isthmus than over wider parts of New Zealand. Yes, in the West part of Auckland, there was much damage in the Cyclone Gabrielle in 2023, with some houses having to be demolished. But that was an anomaly. Meanwhile, both in the  Cyclone Gabrielle in 2023 and in the cyclone that has just passed us, Northland, the Coromandel Peninsula and further South were bashed cruelly by the storm – not as destructive as Cyclone Gabrielle but still causing much damage, making some people homeless and roads flooded.

What is the best that can be said about this? We should be grateful that there were clearly repeated warnings put out by the government and on radio and television. We should be grateful for the meteorologists who explained the situation. We should be grateful for the men and women who had helped people out when roads had been blocked or bridges had become impassable. We should be grateful that there were people who looked after others who had lost their homes. But most of all, we should never be smug because our part the New Zealand missed the deluge. We are always in it.

 

Monday, April 6, 2026

Something New

  We feature each fortnight Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.    

HUNGUS by Amber Esau [Te Herenga Waka University Press, NZ$30:00] ;  LIFTING THE ISLAND by David Eggleton [published by Red Hen Press, Pasadena, C.A.] $NZ36.79 ; NEW DAYS FOR OLD – Prose Poems by James Brown [Te Herenga Waka University Press, NZ$30:00]


I have to admit that I approached Amber Esau’s Hungus with some trepidation – not because I didn’t like it [it’s great] but because, as well as being a mere palagi, I am woefully ignorant of Samoan mores and traditions and also not young enough to understand all the patois that some younger people now use. Every so often I also had to look at the glossary at  the end, to explain some Samoan words. But having got used to this I was in the swing. Part of the blurb tells me that Amber Esau is  a SaMoaRish… writer from Tamaki Makaurau” – in other words, she has [I think] some Samoan relatives and some Maori relatives … or have I misinterpreted that? If so, I’d like somebody to correct me.

First question: what is the Hungus which is depicted so vividly on the cover [by Katrina Steak]?   Is it a violent alien creature or an avatar of humanity, part of our own moods? The vocabulary refers to the Hungus as “she”, so maybe Amber Esau is really channelling some extreme thoughts and much youthful angst. Just a thought.  We are told “her Frankenstein tongues are not quite past the bit where the doctor says ‘It’s alive!!!’”  … but despite the early parts of this collection, the Hungus itself soon disappears.

Much of this collection has to do with young people – teenagers and young adults. We are in the area of youngish people jostling in crowds – presumably in Auckland -  and getting foods from MacDonalds and being smothered by television and gossiping or working and hanging out. There are ironic jabs at KFC as seen in the poem @Mantis where a creature is baffled by the way rubbish is thrown about. In this environment,  adolescents are aware of what cliches are. In a brief, sleek poem Amber Esau tells us [recalling her adolescence] “To want or wannabe is the only question Shakespeare / and the Spice Girls were looking to answer. Wanna / say they knew that’s what fia meant, too. / Sometimes, I want and want / and want so succinctly, / I become a cliché .” Esau is clear about the power of dreams, and how different the world looks in the morning. It is made clear in the last of the Hungus: Ulo Bolos poems  At night, she braids all her heads so they don’t tangle in her sleep and when she wakes up, her heads are wild, scraping with fruit flies.”  A similar idea is given to us in the poem Space Cadet, clearly about a young man, which ends “The man from Mars with lasers in his eyes, glue from his throat. / He’s the threat every parent uses against their kids./ After too much fuel, he’ll blast the doors in, holding all the exit signs, / and slur into the crooks of his sharp corners / wondering where his high score went. / In the morning, the man is just a man, while the space boy is still trying to roll free.” Dreams have to turn into reality.

In this world, there are inevitably the matters of sex and sexuality and gender. On the whole Esau is discreet about these matters, but they are there. And  growing teenagers have their first dealing with drugs in the poem “Quickocrisy”. There are one-off experiences, including the sheer interest in listening to a singer in a pub.

But throughout there is an awareness of Samoan culture and Samoan families.

There are many reflections on the sea and the sky and ships and shores as seen in Samoa. One of the very best is Night at the Neptune which is as much protest and fear as it is about beauty if you can see it. It reads in full “Under a blackboard sky / a plane smears the chalk /and the stars get confused. / Girl, we are trying to accept all / the patterns that we share / but someone keeps shooting / metal from the clouds, / fucking up the water. Isn’t / singing like manu, / chesting like tangata, /  tailing like ika, enough / to remind us we dream / the seams? We massage / the stiches with bone dust, / tuck our feathers behind / out ears, say, ‘E manaia lava ia’ / and we must need it,eh.  

Dealing with Samoan families in such poems as  Relative Power Cuts, we hear the liveliness and gossip about the things the faifeau’s son [the parson’s son]  has been up to. There are a number of poems about teenagers being mouthy, who would then be told off by nana and other elders, telling them they were “tautala’titi” – basically meaning cheeky. There could be cattiness of teenagers as in the poem Don’t Trust Islanders; not to mention the poem Rainbow’s End, wherein school children are rivals for attention. There are comments about  the Christian faith as in the poem Holding the Hologram Jesus. There are also many references to Manaia – a protector and messenger from the spirit world as in the poem The Uranus Trap.

Esau styles can be many. There are some experimental works. [Is her The Coaxial Triptych really a poem or more of a game?] There are prose poems such as the young woman’s quest 2 Puna Idol. There are many neat brevities, such as Silhouettes which reads in full “It’s possible to see each other’s pain. / Watch the moana pull back / the frothed shore, revealing / the glass we might’ve made with the sun / is still sand.” While some poems are almost cryptic and require careful reading, some of  Esau’s poems are very clear, especially the poem Tasi /Gree, dealing with the killing of baby sharks. And there is almost a surrealist poem which tells us of family waiting for a dinner in the restaurant.

When I consider the whole of this collection, I have to point out that this review covers only some of Hungus, even though I have read it all carefully. It deals with far more things that I could analyse in one review. It is a very detailed book. What I am sure of is that Amber Esau has made a great piece of work, and I see her as balancing carefully Samoan experience and Auckland experience.

 *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  

 

David Eggleton has become one of New Zealand’s major poets since the 1970’s and there must be only very few readers of poetry in New Zealand who have not read some of his works. Eggleton has not only produced many collections of poetry but he is also known for his essays and his role in editing and writing for literary magazines. For the record, you may find on this blog my reviews of some of his collections, such as The Conch Trumpet,   Edgeland,   The Wilder Years  - Selected Poems, and  Respirator. Also – given that the publishers are American - there is a glossary at the end of Lifting the Island explaining words that might be unfamiliar for Americans.

Born in Auckland, Eggleton is – says Wikipedia – “of mixed European, Tongan and Rotuman descent”. What is clear in nearly all his poetry is his interest in both the New Zealand context and the Pasifika contest. One blurb describes Lifting the Island as “a kind of lyrical world map of the South Pacific”. This is true in one way as there are many poems that are almost romantic. But Eggleton is also ready to deal with the negative things.  Lifting the Island runs to 160 pages of poetry. It is divided into six parts – Lifting the Island, The Shallows, The Great Wave, The Whale Road, The Wall and Beacon. First point, while the six parts each has its own view of a particular place or island, nevertheless many poems are not dealing with any particular place. Secondly, while I read with great interest all of this collection , there is simply no way that I can analyse everything that Eggleton has written.

So I will deal solely with some favourites. The opening poem Lifting the Island presents people at the beach on an island. It is followed by the poem Flying in Southside, which appears to be presenting the part of Auckland where his father worked and where Eggleton was very young. In a variety of poems he gives his idea of, after an all-night party, Albert Park which is “like an old magnolia’s magnificent candelabrum - / flames of white flowers which gutter and go out - / life goes on without us in particular”.   Or again there is the poem Isthmus which gives a panorama of Auckland, but not entirely a flattering one. I shuddered at the line “a concrete hypodermic lit by gamble fever” which seems to me the most correct depiction of the crass Sky Tower. So there is much of Auckland to begin with. Later the poem Soundings gives us all the noises [some delightful, many annoying] that one can hear in a city. As for Tomorrow, Eggleton writes a list of things about what the future could be, but not in a naïve way – who knows, good or ban, where the future will go?

Turning to nature there are more natural things, such as Moonshine; or wherein “Rain brings Fred Astaire’s tap-tap across the roof, / before a razz of jazz is given tumultuous applause, / the ozone in the air extinguished like snuff / of golden beeswax melted in candles. / Petulant petals quiver in crimson. / Rain bodies forth a spectacular earthworm welcome / from hitherto undistinguished lawn.  Perfect description. As sound are The Shallows, and The Colour. The long poem Methusalem is a full panorama as seen from one perspective.

When getting further into the section called The Great Wave, we reach some way into the mores of Pasifika. The moods of the sea are all around. Belief in the Pacific does not exactly belittle Christianism and belief on the island, but it does place it against the majesty of the ocean itself. In the poem Brightness we get pure description of the best sort. And speaking of the poem The Great Wave itself there is the torch of a fable that may have been handed down through the ages by the elders. Read it for how carefully Eggleton slides into images of a forbear titanically fighting the currents between New Zealand and more northern Pacific islands.

Odes to Weary Dunlop seems to be interesting and surprising memories of watching movies at the flicks [often movies about war] when he was a kid.

After all these poems I have so far praised, there is one poem which I think should be plastered on every N.Z. high-school blackboard – and be read by adults too. This is The Navigators, a long poem about the migration in ancient times of Pasifika, colonising the South Pacific. It is an heroic story in itself, but the main point comes at the end, reminding us that the seas are now rising, climate-change is here, and some islands are in peril of being drowned.   Quite different is Explorers, which jokingly deals with how different gods quarrel with one other and how they see human beings. As for the arts, there are poems about artists, like Hundert Wasser and Len Lyne’s Wind Wand.

I think it is fair to say that in the section called The Wall, there is a real tendence to deal with moods and what is more sombre. But in the section called Beacon, poems like Distant Ophir and Sunday Songs are a real recall to childhood. Dealing, too, with the South Island [ Eggleton now lives in Dunedin], there is a detailed and moving poem about the Christchurch earthquake Quake, 22nd February. And, in another thoughtful poem that amounts to a work of protest, there is The Plastisphere, chastising all the plastic junk that is now polluting the seas.

As always, I have done no more than highlighting a selection of the many poems in this collection. As always, very readable.

  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.

 

Prose poems are a special art. Baudelaire did it brilliantly when he wanted to. T.S. Eliot did it occasionally. Others did it every so often. In New Days for Old, James Brown gives us 185 prose poems. In this collection,  James Brown is many things. He is a jester, a joker, just a feller looking around, a child remembering things, and sometimes an adult deliberately acting like a child. Yes, there are moments of sheer da-da. Yet often enough it adds up to truly thoughtful ideas. To begin with the obvious, New Days for Old is funny, very readable, often silly, enjoyable if you take it prose poem by prose poem, and opens by quoting the words of another writer “Much of the greatest art, I find, seeks to remind us of the obvious.” Quite so.

Take, for example, the outlook of a child when dealing with a disabled man. Here it is in full. “We take lasagna round to John because ‘He’s fallen through the cracks,’ says my mother. That must be why it’s bad luck to step on them. ‘The  trickle-down theory is a plates of pish-posh, she adds. When we arrive, John is sword fighting in the air with a cake fork.” [p.11] Is this as seen through the naivety of a child? Or has there been irony injected by an adult looking back? The same goes for the passages about school days. And much later an adult voice sees a child cringing at the awful noises adults can make. Thus  They were a loquacious people. Even their ears could talk. I saw a small boy crouched in a corner covering his, trying to make them stop.”  [p.87] 

            There are moments of almost perfect joy….but only sometimes, as said here  A man, beached like a seal in foam, spoons his flippers through wet sand. Yoga lady salutes the sun. Bookmark woman prolongs a handstand, her landing strip perfectly balanced. In calm days, you can breaststroke through the rocky channel, following your shadow over sand and seaweed. Yes, it is idyllic, but one must return to one’s towel and uniform.” [p.22]

            There is a both jocular and thoughtful statement which is altogether true, at least as metaphoric, but deeply ironic.  Thus “A soft-voiced man in a brown suit speaks to Jesus’s offer of salvation, his hands proffering pamphlets like doves. A young Greenpeace woman with her clipboard. A man outside KFC claims he was once fried chaffinch. The Earth’s rotation is caused by our footsteps. If enough people walk in one direction, they can turn the Earth toward them.” [p.39].  There are the oddities of people’s behaviour. And there is the loneliness of small towns, as in “The small town was as quiet as its museum. I walked the rows of stuffed birds like a general inspecting his troops, each one fixing me with an angry glass stare….”   [p.51]

There are accounts of trying of find work, which may or may not be true and may or may not be part of his autobiography, such as his work as being a “Visual Display Artist” [i.e. one of those people who dress up mannequins for shop-front display]. There is a prose poem which could be true for many people who have experienced Fiordland [me being one of them]. It reads in full “ The sandflies came from my lost decade. We stood topless in a lonely Fiordland shore seeing who could  withstand them for the longest. Neither of us was going anywhere.” [p.69]

There is the perfectly absurd prose poem which tells what could be the true story of  Hansel and Gretel. And let’s face it, James Brown can play silly games. There is an ongoing joke about babies, made by adding the word “baby” to the titles of movies. But then he hits you with things that are all too true. Take this: “The beach is speckled in summer snow. I walk the tideline pecking at the polystyrene globules. A couple of other broilers strut past clucking and tutting. ‘Rubbish’ we agree. Every high tide, all our little chicken come home to roost.  [p.67].

Much to think. Much to laugh. Much good reading.

Footnote: On this blog, you may find my reviews of two there earlier collections of James Brown’s work. They are The Tip Shop and his earlier Floods Another Chamber  I have to admit that I was rather too severe in dealing with the latter one.

Something Old

 Not everything worth reading is hot off the press. In this section, we recommend "something old" that is still well worth reading. "Something Old" can mean anything from a venerable and antique classic to a good book first published year ago. 

 “FALTER TOM AND THE WATER BOY” by Maurice Duggan [published in 1957]; and “POBBY AND DINGAN” by Ben Rice [published in 2000]

            Occasionally I read children’s books – a habit I have had not only from when I was a child, but also when I read to my children when they were young… and sometimes I read children’s book just for my own pleasure. Two that stand out for me are these two.

  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *


 

Maurice Duggan [born 1922; died 1974] was one of New Zealand’s best known writers of short stories [he once tried to write a novel but decided it was not for him]. His stories are not whimsical but usually serious and explore facets of New Zealand life, good or bad. But he also wrote two long stories for children. One of them was Falter Tom and the Water Boy. It was given to me as a present when I was about ten. It was dedicated “To Nicky” and I thought that meant it was dedicated to me. It was of course dedicated to Duggan’s one-and-only child Nicholas. [And I add that I personally came to hate being called Nicky, though I’m perfectly happy to be called Nick.]

Falter Tom and the Water Boy is in many ways a sad story, but one that children can understand. Falter Tom is the name given to an old man because he limps and therefor falters. He lives alone. He is an old seaman, now retired, but he often spins tales about his days at sea. His accent suggests that he came from Ireland. He lives near the beach of a shore in New Zealand, and he loves to walk along the beach every morning. One morning he sees a strange creature, almost a boy but also a sea creature, swimming near the shore. The creature calls himself a Water Boy… and he shows Falter Tom how to swim under water simply by following him. So, even in full dress, Falter Tom can follow the water boy, even at the top speed of the fastest ship. Most of the story is simply all the things that can be seen in the depth of the sea, the fish and the sharks, the ships that have sunk, the corals and other wonders. The Water Boy has apparently lived for thousands of years. But the time comes when the Water Boy tells Falter Tom that he has to choose. Does he want to become a Water Boy himself, forever living deep in the sea; or does he want to return to the beach. He chooses to live in the deep. But, as in many stories, the ending is ambiguous, as  Falter Tom has left his cap on the beach. And any intelligent child would understand that Falter Tom had simply drowned. If you like, this is the story of a man who loved the sea so much that he thought he could live forever in the sea. When I was a child, the story puzzled me a little, much as I liked it. Now I take it to mean that death is inevitable. Yet the way Maurice Duggan wrote it Falter Tom and the Water Boy shows how wonderful the sea is and all the things that it contains… yet there is a sense of loss.  

By the way, it is interesting to note that Falter Tom and the Water Boy was published in New Zealand by the old Paul’s Book Arcade ; but it was also published in Faber and Faber in London, so it clearly had a good readership. But even more important, it had earlier been published in the old New Zealand School Journal, one of the many worthwhile things that no longer exist.  

 *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  

 


            There is a sense of loss in Pobby and Dingan too, but also with an awareness of achievement. Pobby and Dingan was Ben Rice’s first book - a novella -  published in 2000, and it was immediately a hit. Apparently it was made into a film… but I hate to think what the film was like, as the novella is written in the first-person by a young boy; and his unique voice carries it along. Since writing Pobby and Dingan Rice has produced only a few works and some poetry. Rice was born and raised in England, but he was interested in Australia and Pobby and Dingan is set in Australia.  Rice now lives in Australia.

            A simple synopsis: In the harsh Aussie outback, in a mining town called Lightning Ridge, men are digging in the hope of hitting precious opal. Kellyanne Williamson is the daughter of a miner. She is a little girl who has two imaginary friends called Pobby and Dingan. She is so often seen walking around, introducing people to her imaginary friends, that people play along with her and politely talk to Pobby and Dingan. Her brother Ashmol, some years older than her, makes fun of her and says Pobby and Dingan are just made up nonsense. One day, her father says she will look after Pobby and Dingan when Kellyanne is at school. But when her father comes home from work, he has completely forgotten about the imaginary people.  At which point Kellyanne becomes very sick… and continues to get worse and worse. In fact she has to go to hospital.  And from this point on, Ashmol does his very best to find, or at least to be able to say what has happened, to Pobby and Dingan. Ashmol can swear and usually speak in a very Aussie crude way, but he is a real and believable young kid. There are other issues in the tail [Ashmol’s dad gets in trouble with another digger who thinks he is trespassing on his land]. But the backbone of the story is what can only be called the dogged heroism of the boy who realises that he has to do something for his little sister as her condition gets worse and worse; and who tries to rally others to help him.

            In this case I will not give away exactly how it all ends, but like Falter Tom and the Water Boy it does touch on the inevitable nature of death. Is it a tear-jerker? In a way it is, but it is also true to the way children think about life and death. 

 

 

Something Thoughful

    Nicholas Reid reflects in essay form on general matters and ideas related to literature, history, popular culture and the arts, or just life in general. You are free to agree or disagree with him.  

                                              WEATHER MAKES FOR MOODS

            In the 18th century a poet called James Thomson decided to write a long poem about The Seasons – yes, Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter and a closing Hymn thanking God. The whole poem covers over one hundred pages of tight print. In the 18th century, this over-long poem was greatly admired and seen as a classic. It was the type of book that could be given to erudite people to read, and it was lauded by parsons and those with great patience. For the fact was that Thomson wanted to describe every flower, every snow drop, every tree that lost its leaves when the cold came, every cloud that changed, in minute detail. When I was a teenager, I thought I should read it and I diligently ploughed my way through it. I won’t belittle poor old Thomson. Occasionally he came up with some good lines. Helen Gardner, when she edited The New Oxford Book of English Verse in 1972, was courteous enough to include three of Thomson’s moments which she headed as A Winter Night, Spring Flowers and The Autumnal Moon… and they are pretty good. But oh woe! How hard it is to read all of The Seasons.  By the end of the 18th century, James Thomson’s poem was very out of favour. I think it was sarcastic Oscar Wilde [I might be wrong]  - in the late 19th century – who said that Thomson’s The Seasons was what you would give as a present to somebody you didn’t like. Very few people now read all of The Seasons. My own view is that you would get more pleasure from listening to Vivaldi’s bright and sharp Four Seasons than from trying to read all of James Thomson’s The Seasons.

Now why am I grumbling along about the seasons? It’s because I am aware of how my moods can change when the weather changes.  And I am sure this is true of everybody else. So here is my story.

Last Thursday the rain rained and rained and rained over Auckland. It was not that awful battering rain that struck us all three years ago when there was the Cyclone Gabrielle where the rain was relentless and very destructive. Rather it was an endless pitter and patter strong enough to being annoying all day and bad enough to make it difficult to control an umbrella. Above all day where dark grey and black clouds. And what did I do? After one visit to the supermarket, coming home wet, I stayed indoors. And I remained grumpy. And listless. And not wanting to do anything. And finding all the books on my shelves uninteresting. And wondering what was the point of anything. And having a coffee. And having a tea. And not being satisfied. And wondering what was the purpose of life. You get the idea, don’t you? It’s the weather that makes you either happy or morose.

But Lo!! Friday [the following day] there was no cloud whatsoever over Auckland. The sun shone brightly. The sky was pure blue all day long – no clouds whatsoever. The temperature was warm and mild. And I was busy, and happy, and taking a long walk, and thinking up ideas, and reading some good poetry [and some bad ones], and watered the flowers [not that they needed much water after the previous day], and happily helping make the dinner and doing the washing-up whistling and seeing life as wonderful….

And in the following days, the weather was half-and-half. Bright sunlight… then a little drizzling… then some sunlight and a nice breeze… then some drizzling… and so on. Everybody knows the old joke about  Auckland “If you don’t like Auckland’s weather, just wait  half-an-hour”. 

 I have cheated in writing this post. After all, these events happened in one season… but the moodiness of weather is a reality. I wonder how moody Thomson was when he wrote about winter even if he sweetened it up?

Monday, March 23, 2026

Something New

We feature each fortnight Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.   

                “THE BLACK MONK” by Charlotte Grimshaw  (Penguin, $NZ38:00)


 

The Black Monk is the first novel that Charlotte Grimshaw has produced since ten years ago. A prolific novelist, she has spent those ten years considering other matters, in particular the family she came from. In 2021 she produced The Mirror Book [reviewed in this blog] - non-fiction and giving a largely negative version of her parents, C.K.[Karl] Stead and his wife Kay. When I had read the first twenty pages or so of The Black Monk, I thought I was a very clever chap because I twigged that many of the main characters were really the Steads and their friends but given fictitious names. Before I crowed, however, my weekly copy of the N.Z. Listener arrived with a good review of The Black Monk by the very capable journalist Philip Matthews, and he hit most of the points that I was going to make.

So let me give you a simple synopsis of a part of The Black Monk.

Alice Lidell writes books for children. Alice is concerned that her brother Cedric [nicknamed “Ceddy” ] is becoming a hopeless addict and alcoholic. But when she tries to tell her parents about it, and pleads that they should do something about it, they say that Alice is being too concerned or even hysterical; and Cedric is fine. They deny the truth. But Cedric is getting worse.  Alice’s mother is Rula [as in “Ruler” – a domineering person], a would-be painter. Alice’s father Thom is an M.P. and is often away in Wellington. They are, in effect, in a state of denial.

Denial in the face of the obvious is what Charlotte Grimshaw said about her parents in The Mirror Book. Her mother Kay claimed that she wasn’t in the least upset by her husband Karl’s philandering… when in fact she was often desperately upset. She wanted to present her home as peaceful as befits a much admired academic and novelist and poet.

In The Black Monk, Alice Lidell tells us that her mother Rula often belittled her; and when Alice was a teenager Rula encouraged her to be a sort of teenage “rebel”, ridiculing teachers, consorting with deadbeats and getting into trouble. And Alice witnesses her gay friend Ezra being killed by a hit-and-run car. All this is almost the same in The Mirror Book.

So I could continue pointing out other characters who are important in The Black Monk, such as the psychotherapist Dr. Botherway [a deliberately amusing name] ; the German woman Javine who may be a friend of Alice but who is severe in tone and carries the guilt of having parents who had been Nazis; the cousin of Alice who is almost the same age as Alice and who can update her on doings in her family etc. But all this is not the core of the novel.

If Alice Lidell writes books for children, Charlotte Grimshaw writes for adults and much of The Black Monk is really her examination of her own mind, her attempt to understand what or who she is. Alice decides to write a book called The Black Monk and Charlotte Grimshaw is writing a book called The Black Monk. As I see it, this is a novel about a novelist who has sometimes lost reality and then has to look back and see if she has made a mistake. Did she really remember things accurately? Do novelists think they have heard  a conversation, made use of it in a novel, and then realise that it was merely something the author had made up? Then, of course, there is the matter of “the black monk” itself. Who or what is this? As used in this novel, it is a mysterious person who sometimes meets Alice especially when she is in distress and who then is no longer seen. Is this the man sometimes called Anton? Or is it simply another fantasy of the author? Sometimes also this novel refers to Jung’s idea of  “the shadow” within us – that is, the negative side of human beings, including our capacity to hurt other people, lie etc. but which we try to suppress.

I apologise in advance to Charlotte Grimshaw for my conclusion;  but I see this novel as largely an exercise in psychotherapy, gradually healing personal wounds. “Rula” [Kay], who blighted her young life, died in 2023. Charlotte’s older brother Oliver died in 2024. I do not know anything about how or why Oliver died so I am only guessing that he was the basis for  “Cedric”. But the healing comes towards the end when “Alice’s” mother “Rula” dies and “Alice” now sees her as somebody who had gone through hard times and who had some qualities to be admired.

Footnote: This thing about The Black Monk. The blurb reminded me that Charlotte Grimshaw had written a short story some years back called The Black Monk and now her novel of the same name. Both were inspired by a novella by Chekhov. The Black Monk was published in 1893. It concerns a young man called Kourin who has delusions of greatness. He tries to shake off his delusions by going to a rural area where he can cool down. But in the twilight he meets a black monk who questions his sanity. He believes he will save mankind… … but in the end his delusions kill him. Again, it’s up to Charlotte Grimshaw to interpret what the black monk means to her. But I think in this novel it signals how authors can also have grandiose ideas and mis-interpret what they had seen, just as “Alice” does.