-->
Showing posts with label Kate Camp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kate Camp. Show all posts

Monday, May 5, 2025

Someting New

 

We feature each fortnight Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.  

“over under fed” by Amy Marguerite (Auckland University Press, $24.99); “Makeshift Seasons” by Kate Camp (Te Herenga Waka University Press, $NZ25); “Clay Eaters” by Gregory Kan (Auckland University Press, $29.99); “The Intimacy Bus” by Janet Charman (Otago University Press, $30)

                     


            There’s a strong possibility that I will be chastised by some if I point out that the feverish, overloaded and yet brilliant imagery and metaphor in Amy Marguerite’s debut collection over under fed is similar to the wildness and fervour of the teenaged genius Rimbaud. Yes, she does use the current affectation of writing “I” as “i”. Yes she does write everything in lower case. Yes she does sometimes run sentences together. But her work is compelling, her images hold attention and in the end we get a whole life’s story. She dedicates her opus “For the quietly immoderate” and much immoderation there is. Amy Marguerite is an adult woman, but her narrative – such as it is – is focused on her adolescence. To put it simply, she was plagued by anorexia nervosa, a condition that is most often connected with teenage girls, and she spent time in hospital wards. Every so often, we are given poems headed “discharge notes”. Over under fed is divided into four sections - “terms and conditions” “love language” “ward 25” and “hollowing full” and in a way they do move us towards a sort of conclusion – apparently a final escape from her anorexia nervosa condition. She is now apparently over being under fed - hence the book’s title. But as the four sections often overlap, I will read the work as one ongoing narrative.

A febrile, fragile psyche is suggested at once in the opening poem “far too blue” which sets the pace with “I have grown appendages of contempt / for many things. I believe in god because people / are too digestible. I am terrible at staying / in touch unless they are exceptionally interesting…/… I give up at once on anything I cannot immediately be / brilliant at…” And the following poem “reuptake inhibitor” declares “it seems / a cliff is only dangerous / after you jump of  / of it and I am so tired / of jumping”. [A statement which she refutes much later in this collection]. This signals deep depression. Sequential poems tell us that love is sadness, that she is out of the beat when it comes to music, and in the “july poem” “I feel like a hairdresser / turning away / the kids with headlice…”.   There is evidence of disorderly eating as a teenager. Much later in the collection there is the poem “when my body was Amorphophallus titanium” again with a lack of confidence as a teenager and listing all the things she was not able to do with ease.

There is also the problem of limerence [a term created by a psychiatrist in the 1960s] which means having obsessive love for somebody else, but without reciprocation [I confess I had to look this up]. Amy Marguerite writes a poem called “limerence” which asks “why do I obsess over people / who understand me?” I take a wild guess here and wonder if this refers to people who have tried to help her… or maybe not. It’s common for teenagers to have crushes on people who do not respond. She writes in the poem “stalling” that “I keep thinking / about apologising / for not holding your left hand / when my right one / was stupidly clammy” There is that sense of being inferior, as if one were bowing down to a goddess. And “I’m too busy wondering what now / we would be in / it I had let my wine- / dry lips scutter / crabwise down your cheek. But wondering is / brutally futile…”. The poem “love language” steps up the limerence with “don’t you / want to waste / your entire lunch / break wondering / how? / without any kissing / at all” There are many connections with women, but mostly they seem girlish dreams. Like most young people who want to have a hidden life [like getting away from parents, for example] she writes in “discharge notes (iii)” that “When diaries get gritty you put them / in a shoe box call them gone. call them / one less segment of yourself to mourn / something like that. i keep so many secrets / from myself.” Growing older, into maturity, she turns to men but in the poem “raisins” she declares she f**king hated men but she f**ked them and she dieted on raisins to remain slim for them and “i kept hating and f**king”. Make of this what you will, but some sort of desperation is signalled.

As for the parts about the anorexia nervosa wards, they can be quite graphic. While “fortisip” recalls her petulant behaviour as a kid when she was being taken to hospital by her parents, “discharge notes (iv)” gives us the buzz on other girls in her ward and learning their tricks on “how to get away with water loading / before my five a.m. weigh-in ha ha. / I was really good at being sick it felt good. / to be good at something. bad to be good.” Despite having grown past her affliction, she still to the very end has a very negative view of the nurses in the hospital.

At which point I could raise some ideas about the poet’s gender or sexual identity. Most of her attraction was to girls but she seems to have settled down with a guy whom she calls “my darling partner Blair”. Not that it matters I suppose and none of my business anyway. I’m also interested by the many passing references to her grandmother throughout this collection. But this is all by the way. What is important is that Amy Marguerite has produced a vital and lively work – angst-fill inevitably, but honest in its confessionalism and filled with energy. As a debut, it’s brilliant.

  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *


 

By now an accomplished poet with a many collections to her credit, Kate Camp has moved on in her focus. Once, when I reviewed one of her earlier books, I said her work was “usually housebound anecdotes”. While this might have been true for the earlier book, it is certainly not true for her latest collection Makeshift Seasons [the title comes from the last words in the book]. Yes, there are some poems about home and her surroundings, but they are only a small part on her palette. As was the case in her previous work, she tends to write in the first person - in fact in nearly all 36 poems in Makeshift Seasons. So obviously there is a sense of either confessionalism or autobiography. Unlike some of her contemporaries, she does not use free verse [well… she does not usually]. Her prosody is largely traditional, with stanzas neatly separated. Her poem “Entropy” is a sort of sonnet – at least it divides into octave and sestet even if it doesn’t rhyme – and with an analysis of first a consulting a doctor and then having the odd reaction once she was outside. Her “Epiphany” is also a sort of sonnet – in this case first an event [octave] and then an unexpected outcome [sestet].

Yet let me admit that I was intimidated by the opening two poems in the book. “Kryptonite” picks up tropes about Superman and uses it to consider how we are both strong and fragile. “Trajectory” is apparently about the pain and coldness of the seasons, but after reading it many times over I could not decode what it was really saying. Its imagery is so cryptic as to be opaque… but thank goodness she moves on to clarity in all the following poems.

Like most poets, Camp deals with favourite interests. She comes back a number of times to a favoured spot in Wellington, thus the poem “Island Bay” being a neat little vignette of politeness by the water. Later there is “Island Bay again” with darker images on the same shore; and later still there is “Island Bay Beach” about swimming there where “I appreciate the smaller space / at high tide, soft, soaked sand / cleared of footprints…” - though she also paints here images of discomfort. After all, no place is really idyllic. “Freyberg Carpark” is a clear and thoughtful poem, depicting a place and time and a mood struck by two very different women meeting. I found this the most engaging poem in the collection.

Speaking of which, there is a sensibility about places in poems about overseas travelling. “Driving in France” is a straightforward memory of a journey near Mont-Saint Michel . But “Wittenberg” reveals the truth that often, when we tourists go to see something of historical or cultural interest, we find we are more distracted by small and perhaps trivial things that have amused us. There are domestic poems - “Equinox” is about the house they live in and how it was when they first entered it. “Autumn” is a relatively straightforward [and therefor readable]  account of the effect of that season “It’s a beautiful morning. That’s what we call a morning / with a red tugboat at a distance, long white / landscape of fog against the hills, sun gold / on buildings.”… and then she shifts into modish reveries of being in a bar in Berlin.

As well as place, home and season, there is much interest in health; or rather ill health. Kate Camp, now in her 50’s, is aware of the way the body begins to take some knocks.  “Inpatient versus outpatient”, like some others of her poems, indicates going through pain of one sort or another – not fatal or severe but irritating and uncomfortable. “Here is the church” also signals bodily discomfort, considering what it would be like being an old woman: “How will I grieve these hands / when they no longer interlock / the tiny mountain ranges of a zipper / or seal with their perfectly-fitted pads / my nostrils, mouth and chin / as I cover my face with them / in cold, in curiosity, in comfort / or just because I can / because this body / is still mine / and I can hide it / whenever I want to.” The most uncomfortable of poems about ill health must be “summary of our mini-survey on regret” which seems to signal things she does not want to talk about in detail. Something similar is “In the bathroom rubbish bin.” And “Grease”, a kind of fantasia of what adolescence was, also has a sense of awkwardness which is very aligned to pain.

If favoured spots, travel, home and ill health dominate this collection, there are many other interests. “Towards a working definition of global warming is an acute account of the nature of light in the night with “one lightbulb-shaped lightbulb / burning always in the neighbour’s hallway for their children / I suppose, if they were , still. Plus general light reflecting / off clouds but I mean it has to come from somewhere.” “Halley’s Comet” is discursive and a sort of resignation to living within a small area, even after having travelled much of the world – and there is consolation that Halley’s comet may soar through the universe, but it is only a hunk of rock after all. “I think I’ll remember where the cleaning eye is but I know I won’t” is really two poems somehow joined together – the first six stanzas about a plumber coming and fixing a problem ; the last two stanzas addressing different matters in her life. An interesting structure.

            What does all this add up to? A collection of poetry well worth reading, and a work of maturity.

  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *

 

Gregory Kan is not new to poetry. Far from it. This Singapore-Chinese, with much knowledge of Malaysia, is a New Zealand resident who has twice been reviewed on this blog. When I reviewed his debut collection This Paper Boat  I noted that “I was impressed by Kan’s ability to link past with present in poems that acknowledged the deadness of the past, while at the same time showing the ongoing influence of the past. Kan often referenced, and was in conversation with, earlier authors.” When his second collection came out Under Glass  I said that he “weaves together in this diverse book childhood memories, stories told by his forebears and extended family, stories of his parents’ courtship and early marriage, stories of his own adjustment to New Zealand and memories of his compulsory military service in Singapore.

The fact is that in his latest collection Clay Eaters, he deals with many of the very same issues – the past, memories, having to do military service, his family, etc . But this is far from just repeating himself.

Certainly a tone of nostalgia, and mixed feelings about it, is in an early part of his latest collection, as in this expanded metaphor where looking back means almost drowning: “Memory will not be / Still / Trying to touch the bottom / Of the deep lake / And return to the surface / Clutching god knows what / Blinking in the sudden light / Lucky to be alive.” And towards that end of this collection there is “To wander / Looking for what we have lost / On that other side of silence / A surface that lets us write so many things into it / Knowing the little that we know / In the few ways we know how”. And there is “It’s not just that I always wanted to forget / Or that I always wanted to remember / It’s just easy to get lost / In that garden / Where the wind doesn’t seem / To move on / To another place…”

Kan happily mixes poetry with prose, including many references to “Uncle Boon’s blog” and to jottings he himself made from his own experience. Timescales jump between memories of an island off Singapore, coming back to it years later, life in New Zealand, the times when his parents worked in Wellington, some of his older siblings who had gone to the U.S.A. and finally references to his partner, a woman he calls T. There are some almost eccentric comments, as in telling us that they once had cat called Gilgamesh “part-god he ruled / From a wooden post of our unfinished deck”.

But the most interesting poems have to do with that island off Singapore, Tekong, which carried a rain-forest and which had a military camp where Singapore men had to do their compulsory military service. [The camp was shut down in 1989.] When Kan re-visits the island, he experiences the muggy rain forest but he also notes “it’s small / I’ve been around it many times” He tells us of its fauna, such as “Belukar” meaning “for secondary jungle or forest that grows on previously cleared or cultivated land”. And he notes he had a role in the army’s Combat Intelligence School but “I was glad not to end up as an infantry officer / I wasn’t good at it / Never liked yelling / And the constant hammering of weapons / At things in the trees we couldn’t see.” Yet he did become expert in teaching camouflage.

More profoundly there are his comments on the nature of a humid island and its foliage: “Look closely at the photograph / Swim a bit further out / Unlock the back gate / Separate the seeds from the flesh / Part the branches / Open the letter / Watch the clearing beside the stream / Play the video / Go deeper into the mangroves / Run your fingers between the threads / pray to a god you do not believe in anymore / Try to remember whether you ever made it to the reservoir.” There is much reference to red clay earth and to “Mangroves on either side as far as I could see / Their pale folded roots / Spidering above the muddy, lapping water / A sea of faces in the furrows / Moths open / Trembling with their own ripeness / Fatal softening of surfaces.”

Although he says he does not believe in God he is aware of religious traditions such as burning offerings in vessels to the gods so that the gods will care for those who go to sea. Inter-tangled are Chinese and Malay religions and there are passages about a wise woman sometimes meeting and confronting trainee soldiers at shrines and others. He makes a form of secular religion among the young soldiers, as in “Whether religious or not / Most of us weren’t ignorant / But we had all become superstitious / Our lives were rituals / In heavy gloves / Steel-soled boots / And thermal imaging devices / Tactics were rites / Strategies were prayers / The ways in which we learnt / To rearrange ourselves / Without words / Between the trees.”

Incidentally, he brings in a very Aotearoa comment with his awareness of the similarities of Malay and Maori languages [he gives a list of 22 essential shared words].

  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  

Janet Charman has always been a feminist as she has shown in her earlier collections such as At the White Coast, Ren / Surrender (reviewed on this blog ) and Pistils (also reviewed on this blog). Charman always writes in free verse and she refuses to write the word “I” as she says it is too phallocentric. Instead she writes it as “i”. When I reviewed The Pistils I noted that her poems are “sometimes a little cryptic in expression [and] laud the female body, its gestation, its resilience”. Such is the case with her tenth collection The Intimacy Bus.

What is “the intimacy bus”? The poem “the gender buffet” begins “knocked about / we alight / female and male / rumpled up / from a nine-month trip / in the intimacy bus”– in other words, we spend nine months in our mother’s womb, whereupon she proceeds to tell us of her views of the sexes and her ambiguities about herself. One has to assume that her poems are based on her personal experiences and are in effect autobiography. In the 38 poems that make up this collection, there are some major themes, viz. Age, discomfort and death; Sex, gender and the behaviour of men; and how she is influenced by television and the media.

Consider first age and death. Born in 1954, Charman is apparently obsessed with now being in her late 60s. There are many references to her cat and how messy her house is. Her two daughters occasionally drop in but it seems she spends much time in bed and/or watching television. The poem “in absentia” is a gruelling tale of loss : the painful lamentations after the death of somebody near – it could be her husband who died some years earlier or it could be an infant, but the tone is ambiguous and the imagery is severe, suggesting an extremeness in feeling as in the metaphor “to keep my guts in lockdown / the surgeon stitched in an internal mesh / she’s seen to it my phantom pain / is wished away…” There is pain as the body ages.

With regard to sex, gender and the (mis-)behaviour of men and misogyny, the poem “coming out at 68”  says that she is now “heterosexual lesbian” which suggests she is still working out her gender. She notes that her daughters are sceptical about her claim to be lesbian. Regarding men’s rough behaviour in bed and their boorishness, the poem  “consensual” rebukes “and those who / from a reservoir / entitlement / perceive consent as / their having / free access / to her submission” followed by imagery of masculine thuggery. Likewise the poem “all those excuses we make” tells us how crude the earlier generations were in the way they made excuses for men who dealt brutally with women, pregnant or otherwise. “kabedon” is also about male abuse. With regard to the domestic scene, there is “surveillance” about a woman and man ruined by alcohol. Many verses in her poems tell us of physical problems that are more extreme for women than for men, as in “take two Panadol” with its notice “how many women / I wonder / take two Panadol / for front pain / prior to having a breast screen / or sex

As for how she is influenced by television and the media “my liberation notes” is apparently a reaction to watching violent images… or is it the fear of misogyny? Likewise “bereavement counselling”, about her reaction to Korean soap operas; “eternal summer 1 & 2” is also concerned with movies – how actors age or don’t age on screen; and “for my viewing pleasure”. Are these statements apologising for watching Asian television clichés or is she finding great meaning in them? I’m not sure.   

Charman does tend to ramble in her longer poems. The fact is, I found her most readable works were her collections of either aphorisms or haiku thus “79 Fragments”, being brief statements moving her from childhood to rebellious adolescence to the annoyances of old age, finishing with the killer statement “Unpublished creative writing course graduates / served your sentence / now do the crime”. Wise words. Likewise “18 sex treats” is made of fragments, though in this case focused on male-female sexual relationships, consistently jaded; and “27 episodes from modern life” once again represents discomfort with men. “house lot – everything must go” is again fragments. They can clearly tell uncomfortable truths, viz. “daughters with housekeys / let themselves in / and surprise their mother the old new lesbian / in bed – this rainy afternoon / with her television.” The sequence “your backstory” is the biography of an artist who was mistreated and under-rated at school but managed to get through. “Work in progress” has such brevities as “of that time of childhood / I remember most distinctly / the tedium / the suburban paralysis.

How can a reviewer pass judgment on somebody else’s life experience? Reading carefully, I get the impression that Janet Charman’s life has been a hard one. Even so, I do wonder why she is so upset by old age. I suggest that some readers will find her work hard reading. But I rejoice that in her “Mother Ship” collection she does tell one truth about the collapse of former New Zealand English Departments “The Humanities / out of Time / work under a flag of convenience / by a skeleton crew.” Quite so.

Monday, August 17, 2020

Something New


We feature each fortnight Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.

“FAR-FLUNG” by Rhian Gallagher (Auckland University Press,  $NZ24:99); “HOW TO BE HAPPY THOUGH HUMAN – New and Selected Poems” by Kate Camp (Victoria University of Wellington Press, $NZ30)



            When I had finished reading Rhian Gallagher’s poetry collection Far-Flung, I realised that I had in fact read two quite distinct books. Many collections of poetry are divided into sections with no clear rationale for the division apart from (as one eminent poet explained to me) providing a break for the reader. But the two parts that make up Far-Flung are quite distinct both stylistically and thematically – so I shall deal with them separately.

The 26 poems that make up the first part, “The Speed of God”, are diverse in content.

A hasty and superficial reader would see many of Gallagher’s poems as straightforward vignettes of nature and the country – the poems on the tiny titipounamu (rifleman) pecking its way up a tree; on moths, a salt marsh and a rivulet [which speaks for itself] inaugurating a river; the riddles about Kotukutuku and Kahu; the poem which aims a subtle protest at human violation of the Mackenzie Country. “Country Hall” recreates the buzz and excitement (and sordor and raw crudity) of the old-style country hall surrounded by darkness on a dance night; and there is a walk through “The Old Cemetery”. But only a superficial reading would take any of these as description alone or mere evocation of place. For always, even in Gallagher’s most descriptive poems, there is a balance between the physical scene and the psychological or spiritual impact it has upon the observer. There is always an awareness of, or a yearning for, something beyond the immediate scene. I am in danger of introducing a superseded vocabulary here, but in Gallagher’s poetry I sense a reaching for transcendence and an awareness that somehow nature is separate from the human mind. I keep thinking of Andrew Young’s famous conclusion to his poem “The Fear” that “even in my land of birth / I trespass on the earth”.

Take, for example, the very first poem in the book “Into the Blue Light”, which records a walk up a hill north of Dunedin. But the walk becomes an ascent beyond what is physically possible – a walk beyond nature and into the blue itself, its dualism reflected in the line “I’m high as a wing tip, where the ache meets the bliss”. Most literally, the ache can be read as the physical strain of climbing a hill and bliss as that sense of achievement on reaching the top and seeing the view. But something else is also implied - Joy in the bliss but still an ache for something more. Similarly, the poem “Home” seems at first to be a nostalgic childhood memory of living in a farm house in the country – but it slides into the territory of the child’s mind first intuiting the dichotomy between the comfortable familiarity of home and the wild world beyond, represented by the fields over the fence. There is a tension between what the child knows and what the child either fears or reaches for.

A duality is present even when Gallagher is being satirical. The title poem of the first section, “The Speed of God” announces itself as a witty feminist response to a patriarchal conception of God; but it manages to conclude with a statement on how the whole human race has degraded the Earth. It is only in part a poem about gender.

This duality – or perhaps ambiguity – is also seen in poems where Gallagher addresses directly the matter of being a poet or writer of any sort. The childhood memory “Learning to Read” introduces us to the theme of literacy, in an almost innocent way. But in “The Illuminated Page” there is the fearful discovery that, while writing and making words can be a joy, it can also be a curse by alienating us further from the physical world we inhabit. Consider the lines “ shapes became a sound I made / to suffer / the illumination / gain set on scales / with loss / the world forever after in translation”. In one sense, to become a writer is to be doomed not to experience the world, but to be always thinking about how one is going to articulate the world verbally. There are echoes of the same theme in the more narrative poem (basically about taking up residence in an isolated place for writing)  “Tears, Trees, Birds & Grass”. Here the poet mocks herself by saying repeatedly that she is only “pretending to be a writer” and the burden of writing is when she wonders “if a bird ever wakes up in the morning / sick with the business of singing”. Her heart aches and a drowsy numbness pains her sense at the thought that human beings have a burdensome consciousness, unlike singing birds.

All this, I hope, conveys to you the reality that Gallagher’s poems always have a depth to them rare in much poetry. I have neglected to add that they are also conceived and structured with great craft. Consider one of her best, “Laced in with the Wind”. Note how the unpredicability and arbitrary motion of the wind is expressed in lively alliteration and internal rhymes. A real poet is at work.

The first section of Far-Flung has only a few discreet references to Gallagher’s Irish background and forebears, but it ends with the Irish-themed “Short Takes on My Father” and “Descent”, leading into the second half of Far-Flung, the 22 poems that make up “Seacliff Epistles”. In “Seacliff Epistles” Irish identity is a major focus, as it was in Gallagher’s 2011 collection Shift (reviewed on this blog).

            “Seacliff Epistles” is a bricolage, based on documents, historical research and letters written by inmates (or prisoners if you prefer) of the Seacliff Lunatic Asylum that once existed north of Dunedin. As Gallagher remarks in her end-notes, in the late 19th century a disproportionate number of Irish immigants were in Seacliff, many having suffered the long-term effects of famine and an intense sense of dislocation and cultural shock in being transported from their homeland. They were truly “far-flung”.

In the poem “The Asylum Keys”, Gallagher identifies herself as the modern visitor coming to the site of the long-demolished asylum and trying to relate to the dead. But “the hearts / I can’t hear in the wind / beating; the asylum / locking me out – a ghost / from the future / come to haunt the past.” She can, however, attempt to reconstruct the voices of the dead. “What You Know About Water”, for example, imagines an Irish peasant’s full familiarity with the water-logged nature of the fields he cultivates; but feeling real terror of water when he crosses the huge oceans between Ireland and New Zealand. Contrasting with this is an extract from an authentic letter “A Great Many Never Seen a Ship Before”, written by a non-Irish passenger and looking down on the uncouth, superstitious Papist Irish emigrants as they pray during a storm at sea.

The letters of two women (one an inmate) suggest the sheer misery of an abandoned, lone and unsupported arrival. And “The Workhouse Girls” mixes reconstruction and documentation to suggest the wildness and independence of Irish girls brought to Dunedin in 1874 from punitive workhouses in Britain; and the horror of settled (non-Irish) Dunedinites that such riff-raff should be released among them. The girls were described as “lazy, unemployed, deviant, drunken, parasitical, worthless”. In Gallagher’s telling, poor Irish immigrants and inmates of Seacliff were the dark shadow that haunted the more respectable citizenry of Dunedin.

“Seacliff Epistles” are indeed such a contrast with the first section of Far-Flung that they constitute a separate book. Gallagher’s versatility is much to be admired.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

How to be Happy Though Human is the “new and selected poems” of Kate Camp drawing on her six previous books of poetry, which were published between 1998 and 2017, and including 16 new poems. The title was originally the title of a self-help book, written by a psychologist in 1931, which promised to “touch helpfully on nearly every important problem in everyday life.” The Canadian Kevin Connolly provides an introduction telling us that Kate Camp (born 1972) was born in the age of the internet and so she has an all-embracing and non-compartmentalised view of things. Connolly also remarks that she can reasonably be compared with a number of eminent women poets writing in North America.

As Kate Camp is an established poet whose earlier work has often been noticed and reviewed, I will concentrate on the 16 previously unpublished poems which open this selection. Kate Camp may quote ironically an ancient book’s blurb, but in her new poems she does indeed touch on “everyday life”. All the new poems are written in first person (as, indeed, a large number of Camp’s poems always have been) and hence they have a sort of confessional style, although it is more the confession of small ironies than the expression of heartfelt emotion. Often the ironical statement is triggered by a small domestic event.

“Hallelujah” has her perceiving a miracle (the term is used ironically) in viewing something in the kitchen bin. In “Panic Button” she references a little button that she fingers when she is worried, and not the device used in emergencies that the poem’s title immediately suggests. “My Father’s Teeth” considers the irony of growing old in the form of decaying teeth. “Here’s the Thing” begins with hanging out the washing and “Organs of Sense and Voice” begins in the shower – perfectly harmless everyday things. For a non-Wellingtonian, “Walking Up the Zig Zag” is a perfect Wellington poem involving “mountains, going by the name of hills” and “ragged and fast-moving clouds”. For an outpouring of domestic detail, the very best of Camp’s new poems is “Baffin Island”, which has an oddly exuberant tone even when dealing with the discomforts and shortcomings of a house. And again it has a mildly ironical ending with an image of something far away and inaccessible, in contrast with the cluttered but livable house.

The tone of Camp’s poems is often playfulness, though it is purely a matter of taste how much soft irony the reader can take.

I will not expand on the generous selection that is given of Camp’s earlier six collections. Instead, I will play the dodgy game of acknowledging which poems I found most appealing as I re-read them, or what seem to have been her dominant preoccupations.

In Unfamiliar Legends of the Stars (published in 1998) Camp seems most interested in absences, a boyfriend and a love of books. In Realia (2001) a real or imagined spinal realignment is referenced a number of times. The poem “A Private Geography” holds up very well for its extended metaphor of love as a map. For this Aucklander, the most relatable poems in  Beauty Sleep (2005) are the uncomfortable (or at least disorienting) ones that record visits to Hamilton and Auckland; and in The Mirror of Simple Annhilated Souls (2010) I would rate “Deep Navigation” as Camp’s best work, with its conceit of (piano) music being akin to a sea voyage. From Snow White’s Coffin (2013) I’d have to mention two poems -  “There’s is no easy way” which I read as a bleak comment on death; and “Double Glazing”, which becomes a reflection on light itself. Finally, from The Internet of Things (2017 – reviewed on this blog) I insist, as I said three years ago, that I can still make little of the poem “Life on Mars” but I now see “Civil Twilight” as a melancholy gem.

I apologise for the fact that a swift round-up of the poet’s work is inevitably both brief and glib.

Footnote: Just one mildly annoying aspect of the production of How to be Happy Though Human: the page numbers given in the end-notes do not correspond to the relevant pages in the text.

Monday, March 27, 2017

Something New


NOTICE TO READERS: For six years, Reid's Reader has been presenting an entirely free service to readers with commentary on books new and old. Reid's Reader receives no grants or subsidies and is produced each week in many hours of unpaid work. If you wish to contribute, on an entirely voluntary basis, to the upkeep of this blog, we would be very grateful if you made a donation via the PayPal "DONATE" button that now appears at the top of the index at right. Thank you.]
 
We feature each week Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.


“THE YIELD” by Sue Wootton (Otago University Press, $NZ25); “THE INTERNET OF THINGS” by Kate Camp (Victoria University Press, $NZ25)

            Reviewers are supposed to ruminate, chew things over and gradually work their way towards a punchline giving their considered opinion of a book. With Sue Wootton’s sixth collection of poems, I am too impatient to do this. I want to begin with my conclusion and here it is: The Yield is one of the most satisfying, intelligent, well-crafted and involving volumes of New Zealand poetry I have read in the last decade. This is a poet who really knows her craft, has a wonderful sense of form, and isn’t afraid to front up to big questions without getting sententious about it. Nature, time and a nagging spiritual sense are all part of The Yield, but so too is a strong understanding of family life and the local. The poet is engaged in the quotidian world and not sitting isolated on a mountaintop.
In the opening poem, “Wild”, Wootton takes the artistic gamble of having nature, personified, addressing us. The poem is a kind of invocation, implicitly asking for human understanding and restraint (“Scaffold me with metal, cage me in glass, tube me, needle me, fill me, flush me.”) in the face of the wild. But it is not conservation propaganda. It is carried by its lyricism and its piling on of images.
Nature as such is one of Wootton’s preoccupations in this volume. She delights in the oddities of nature in a poem about breast-shaped clouds (“Mammatus”) In her poem “Wasp” the whole scale of human engagement with nature is seen in a small domestic incident - a man killing wasp is the peer of a prehistoric hunter. There are many poems about the sea and many references to fishing in her imagery. “Sea Foam at Gemstone Beach” sees death in small foaming bubbles. “Every Hunter and Forager” takes a more primal approach to the sea, linking us with other predators since the beginning of time. And then there is a poem like “Wintersight” a deceptively “pure” winter poem about deciduous trees in winter, but carrying beyond that to a real notion of tragedy. It begins flirtatiously:
The sycamore hoists last-leaf yellow parasols
against a clean blue sky. Paper thin they sun-wink, spin,
twirled as if by flirting girls commanding an admiring eye.”
            But the poem moves on to “the silent, dark and necessary forces” that strip a tree bare.
It is inevitable that observation of the cycles of nature leads to a strong consciousness of transience and death, certainly in “Graveyard poem”, but also in “At Hawea”, where rain falls and bubbles die on the surface of a lake; and in “Black Lake”, introducing a destructive, unforgiving side of nature. “Daffodils” appears to be an elegy. “A day trip to the peninsula” is a five-part sequence, which at first seems in a holiday mood until its progression of birds (kingfisher, pukeko, hawk) upsets it with images of predatory nature. The sequence ends with a shiver. On the back of this sense of transience and lost time, there are also some retro (perhaps nostalgic?) representations of time past and time lost. There is the creation of a vanished world in the imagery of “Barrel organ out of order’; childhood recall in “Three poems at the well”; and an intuition that children are untameable in “Of animals”.
Is there more to nature than decay? The spiritual nags at the poet, occasionally emerging as a guess that there might be something more than the physical universe. This is manifested in the odd religious image, sometimes ironical, sometimes almost sardonic, but there nevertheless – not quite “the God-sized hole” in the modern psyche, but something near it. In “The needlework, the polishing” she ambiguously “likes an empty church” i.e. an old church is a purely (and apparently godless) aesthetic experience; but “Autumn voltage” suggests that mystery, even in nature, might somehow be connected to religion; the poem “Priest in a coffee shop” is in a similar vein; and while “Pray” is ironic it again calls on church imagery (putting something in the plate) to make its points.
Yet the final poem of the volume – the title poem “The Yield” [about a scrappy tree nevertheless managing to set down roots in its own way and flower] -seems to affirm, if anything, the fact of life itself, blind but surviving.
Thus much for trotting my way through what this volume is “about”. Of course this tells you virtually nothing about the quality and worth of the poems themselves.
One of the most attractive things about Sue Wootton’s work is her attention to form. Her shape poem, “Jar”, has a conclusion neatly echoing and transforming its beginning. Similarly “Under / Over” is shaped to replicate the descent and the rise of a diver under ice. Her “little shanty” has exactly the (mainly rhyming) form of a sea shanty, tho’ ‘tis evidently all an extended metaphor where the ship is the solidity of love.
More important than these frolics is the strong sense of the value of onomatopoeic sound. Many of Wootton’s poems sing and bounce. Take a look at the poem “Luthier”; or at the central section of “Abandoned stable, Matanaka”, replicating the experience of a horse-ride in childhood:
Misted morning rides on horse-wide tracks
on board the felted ribcage of a breathing beast.
Seed heads swashed our knees. We parted leaves.
The passing world itched flesh to snort and snicker.
Ears flick-flacked and swivelled: nets set to catch
the pitch of tremors set off by a distant barking dog.
The bite, the bit, the spit, the froth, the foam.
The lips that curled back rubbery to show
the sea-slug tongue, the yellow chomping bones…:
The emphases of sound here play out the rhythm of the horse, the accelerating tempo of its pace, and the swift brushing-past of the foliage.
I do not aim to be the uncritical admirer of every poem in this book. A prose poem like “Picnic” is good and precise reportage of a family picnic with young children, but I am not sure that it is anything more than that. Yet this book has some great poems. The greatest may be Lingua Incognita – about both the limits of language and how language does not rise to the occasion of emotional stress. Fittingly, it is quoted in the blurb, drawing attention to one of the poet’s major preoccupations. Then there is “Strange Monster” – a genuinely heroic poem, with references to Marianne Moore, wherein the nature of poetry itself is explored in an extended image of a kitchen. Sue Wootton’s fine sense of form shines here as the poem is written (mainly) in iambic triplets.
A personal favourite, though, is “Ice Diver”, a poem almost in the grand manner, but with strong sense of modernity. I quote it here in full.

O feed more salt to that deepest heart –
blind, propulsive, without a shell, at
each squeeze pushed hard into the net.

Not you, fisherboy, winding in your reel,
sticking to your quota. But you, off-duty,
shoreless, out of your depth, taking your soul

for a freshwater swim under ice, who’ll
ascend your bubblebreath trail
in holy isolation. You in a dazzle

of danger, drifting with the light-struck
dead. You, hooded, sealed in your drysuit
habit. Monk, sprinkle the salt.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Comparisons are odious. Of course they are, so I will not make them. Kate Camp is a different sort of poet from Sue Wootton, and there’s an end of it.
In her sixth collection The Internet of Things, Kate Camp emerges mostly as a miniaturist working on a smaller stage than the grandness of nature. Her poems are filled with ironic, and usually housebound, observations and anecdotes.
The Internet of Things has as its cover image the preserved kitchen of the Spartan working-lass house in which John Lennon was raised. This signals that there will be pop culture references, as well as learned ones, in Kate Camp’s poetry – as indeed there are. At the more High Culture end of the scale, there’s a poem that begins with an epigraph from Heraclitus.
In Camp’s poems we encounter the neighbours’ guinea pig; a party with adult males playing harmless but boisterous games; a settlers’ museum; a three-part poem which seems fired by the fact that the poet’s mother eventually threw her childhood toys away (although an endnote says the sequence was inspired by a ceramics exhibition). This is a domesticated and enclosed human scale.
Also in the housebound mode, there is a very effective and sad poem called “Artist” about being the companion to an artist; and a poem called “The biology of loneliness”.  Both strike me as really being about alienation; about being cocooned and overcome by things. I think they are the best poems in the book.
I admit to finding some poems impenetrable. What exactly is “Life on Mars” about? I do know the TV series called “Life on Mars” about a cop living in the wrong era, but that has nothing to do with this poem any more than the planet Mars has. What really is it saying? The two poems about St Jerome in his cell – via Rembrandt’s painting thereof – are genre fun, though the conclusion of the second (the saint gets eaten by his lion) seems to me a glib sign-off. I also find it disconcerting to see how often the poet writes “you” when she probably means “I”.
In sum, I found The Internet of Things an interesting collection with a couple of highlights.