-->

Monday, June 8, 2026

Something New


 We feature each fortnight Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.       

`“MINDING HIS OWN POETRY COMPOSING BUSINESS – A Biography of Peter Olds” by Roger Hickin   ( Cold Hub Press, $NZ42:50)

Roger Hickin is much to be applauded for his interest in New Zealand writers and poets who have too often been ignored. In 2020 and 2022 he gave us A Roderick Finlayson Reader and Roderick Finlayson – A Man From Another World [both of which were reviewed on this blog]. Now he turns to the poet Peter Olds (born 1944 – died 2023 ) who was finally regarded by some as “the Laureate of the Marginalised”. Once again, Hickin is very thorough in his research. He has read all of Olds’ poems, read the letters and diaries Olds had written,  interviewed as many people as possible who knew Olds, and got in touch with the publishers who distributed Olds’ work. A bonus is the photos [not too many of them] of Olds and some of those who knew him. Before I go too far however, I have to admit that Olds never was one of my favourite New Zealand poets. To put in simply, I found much of his work to be simplistic, sometimes self-pity, and sometimes angry without a cause. But then even I have to admit that he did write at least some good poems so who am I to be condemning him?

Some history. Peter Olds came from a Methodist family. His father was a Methodist lay preacher. The family moved from one place to another. At first they lived in Christchurch. Later they moved to Milton. Young Peter hated going to school and it seems he might have had dyslexia. When the family moved to Dunedin, he began to do well at school –  and over the years Dunedin tended to be the place he liked most.  The family moved to Auckland and Peter had to go to Seddon Tech. in the city. Again he hated the place as in those days (the 1950’s) there was much fighting and thuggery among the schoolboys. When he left school he picked up some jobs, but he became a sort of “bodgey” as was then the term. He spent a week in jail for stealing a car. At about the same time, he found his first real girlfriend who called herself Cathy… and ironically, years later when he was in his sixties, he ran into her again and thought she [now calling herself Katy] would be his permanent girlfriend, but it didn’t last. In his life he went though many women but never settled down with any of them. Back in Dunedin he stole another car. But he was growing up a bit. By the early sixties he was influenced by the Rolling Stones and read Kerouac’s On The Road and dug the Beat Poets.

The first real poet he met was young Hilary Baxter, daughter of James K. Baxter. He was greatly influenced by the poetry of Baxter and Dylan Thomas. So now in his early twenties he wrote his first real poem The Road Is Getting Bumpty. He was also able to write a short play called Loose Boards and Seagulls which was produced at Patric Carey’s Globe Theatre in Dunedin. But he was hampered by his life-long depression and when he tried to write a second play he could not finish it. He needed a psychologist’s help and spent some time in Cherry Farm. But at the same time he proved to be a very good draftsman when it came to drawing and creating images to promote plays for the Globe. He saw James K. Baxter as his guru, so when he moved to Auckland, where he was to be helped by another psychiatrist, he at the same time dossed at Boyle Crescent where Baxter held court with young people. The address was sometimes raided by police looking for illicit drugs  He took to cannabis and other drugs for a while and became a Christian… sort of. But he was on probation for a while and he wrote a poem called On Probation which ran “I, their shiftless longhaired masterpiece / edge toward the courthouse / to face the animal of nightmares. / Eyes, handcuffs and tons / of incriminating files follow our man / who fears even / to pause to light a cigarette / in the light of a dumb lamppost…” All of which may be a little too grandiose for a young poet.

The influence of his Methodist father was long gone. By this stage he had a long affair with a girl called Janice Sturm, commonly known as “Yancy”. He followed Baxter to the Jerusalem commune with his girlfriend where other lost souls went but gradually he became disenchanted with Baxter. He rememberd Yancy would be lying “on a mattress on the floor reading romance books, smoking and sucking on bottles of Phensedyl” while he sat at his desk “bashing on my newly acquired second-hand typewriter – a poem, probably about cats, or our mad relationship, psychiatric hospitals and pills.”   Crap! ” was her verdict to everything he wrote. He regarded her as his “greatest critic.”

By now he was depending on Valium and sometimes Mandrax to keep himself going. Then came the death of  Baxter, about whom he wrote in detail. He went to the tangi and wrote this poem: “I walked slowly up the brown dry / track to your grave & held it / high over your head, and someone in red hair / & weeping jeans ran from the bushes, screaming / “He’s caught Hemi’s cock”. You should  / have seen the size of it, mate… / We ate well that night, listening / to the ducks fly over the flat green water.”

When he broke off with “Yancy” his next girlfriend was Lorene. And all the while he had to find jobs to keep himself alive. He remembered the biting cold weather in the Dunedin winter and he wrote “snoring through grey-sleet storms - / storms that drive the beaten / to bottle and pool-table bar / to lean on the shoulder / of a black-haired girl…”… and then Lorene was gone and his next girlfriend was Lynn with whom he said he had blown “all the seriousness out of me & put me on the track of Lady Lust…”

He kept on writing, and in psychological matters he was greatly helped by Dr. Maureen Bell. It was at that time that he wrote poems about his condition, writing “Tonight , walking home / hunched and greasy from chips and beer, / old dreams rose and grumbled behind me. / I ran the last block in fear. /  Pausing on the steps near home / I saw the victorious moon rise beyond / dark North East Valley: / The sky clear, cool and pale / Earth black from long afternoon rains.” This at first sounds like a man who is confident… but the poem goes on to tell us that “In my room , I wade through rubbish / three feet deep looking for a pen and paper.”

Some friends rallied to him, including Hone Tuwhare with whom he enjoyed fishing. Hone Tuwhare helped Olds get a Burns Fellowship which helped him to write poetry without being distracted over some months. And he had a new girlfriend, Elizabeth Webb, though their relationship lasted only one year. He took a job as a cleaner at the University Bookshop of which he wrote “I work nights at the University Bookshop: / Junior, Intermediate, Headman, Honorary Caretaker, / Master Cleaner. I work in every conceivable position / from toilets, Foreign Language to Herbal Cookery, / sometimes singing ‘Oh What a Beautiful Evening’ and / sometimes not. Mostly, just a race about like / Neal Cassady with an overstuffed vacuum / cleaner snarling on my tail….”

 I have to give him points for being upset by the destruction of the Clutha Valley when the Clutha Dam was being built. He wrote almost like Wordsworth in his thoughts on the valley and its greenery. Every so often, he went back to his parents, dried-out and set drugs aside… but then he would go back to booze and pills. Out of curiosity he went back to what used to be Baxter’s Jerusalem, now tidied-up and with the hippies gone, about which he wrote a poem.  Much cleaner than I remembered it in 1970. A long time since the / drug squads and hygiene officers that once came poking around: / Mr Baxter sedated, the grass clipped neatly around his balls, old scars / healed over, the prickly path edges chopped back, the barefoot / tracks trimmed into lovely English-garden curves, bones and secrets / raked up never to be mentioned again…”

By 1986 it was two years since he needed medication. He settled near to Seacliff and for a while he lived in a hut which he had improved. This was near to what was once a psychiatric hospital but was now empty. By 1990 he was back on the booze. For a while he helped Bryan Harold and Michael O’Leary run a second-hand book shop in Dunedin. He had some operations on one eye, and for some years he wrote no poems. What he called “after a long illness” he started to write again, often turning to ideas that he had considered in notes years before. In publication he was now helped by Michael O’Leary who ran his own work shop. Olds was very bucked up when David Eggleton wrote a positive review of his poems in the Listener. Eggleton said that Olds was “a poet of delicate perceptions robustly expressed” and called him a “laureate of the marginalised”. Olds hoped that he could have published a collection of all his works, but the small publishers were collapsing and there never was a collection of all his works.

He wrote a poem about fishing reminding him of the death of Hone Tuwhare which reads in part “You need the agility of a spear-throwing warrior /  the feet of a high-jumper / and the deft hand of a pool-player. / You need to run head first / fearless into the frothing surf, and / in an instant of non-thinking, cast your line…” He was also able to write a good poem about Baxter for all his sins saying “Who but a madman would kneel barefoot on a hard pavement / in the centre of the busiest business district in the land / and pray for money and friends a rosary dangling over his genitals…” And finally he was glad that his collection Under the Dundas Street Bridge was published. But towards the end his poems had a  sense of despair as in his poem saying “God’s not real. / Purpose is not real. / Meaning is meaningless. / Life itself is unreal / ( on shaky ground) / I miss love (Do you have to be born / with it? – is it a talent?) / Art’s bullshit – neurotic! /  - refined obsession.” But he had some unexpected admirers. After moving to Dunedin, Vincent O’Sullivan “admitted to having held a rather disdainful and incomplete view of Peter’s early ‘beat’ work [and ] enjoyed his occassion encounters with Peter, and found the poems in [the collection] You fit the description.

Knowing that he was getting old, Peter Olds wrote “Most days now / I don’t feel like going out . / I’d rather just sit here / fixing old poems, / looking out the window / for inspiration / at the cloud and mist / drizzling down from the north. / I drag out the dregs / I couldn’t throw away / feeling there’s something there / I haven’t spotted yet, / waiting for the time when / my eye will be clearer / and less fogged by thoughts / of fame and failure.” For a very short time he got back to his first girlfriend  [Kate] but it didn’t work out. By now he was an old man. He had a number of strokes and he was now often seen in a wheel-chair. He died at the age of 79.

Inevitably in reviewing this biography I have given you only a part of Peter Olds whole life and only a very few of his poems have been quoted.  It is interesting that he was very unsure about reading his poems to an audience. He particularly did not like having poetry being mixed with music. On this I agree with him.

Foot note: Michael O’Leary, who published many of Olds poems, is my wife’s cousin. Bryan Harold, who worked in the same second-hand book shop in Dunedin, moved to Auckland and set up a second-hand book shop in Ponsonby, to which I often went to fill my shelves. But it closed up some years back. Pity. 

Somthing Old

  Not everything worth reading is hot off the press. In this section, we recommend "something old" that is still well worth reading. "Something Old" can mean anything from a venerable and antique classic to a good book first published year or two ago. 

“LES TENEBRES” by Georges Bernanos (first published in 1928). Published in English in 1948 under the name Joy, which was the name that Bernanos originally thought should be the name

            The French title of this novel, Les Tenebres, means The Darkness which forbodes something unpleasant or what is not clear. Why then was the English translation called Joy? Let me say the obvious. This novel is one of the most difficult novels I have ever read. It is written mainly as either conversations between two earnest people, or written in terms of the ideas that are going in the head of one character. Sometimes what they say or think can be almost cryptic. What is darkness? What is joy? Ideas can lead us either way.

            The setting is a wealthy mansion in Normandy, but it is falling to shabbiness. The father of the house is Monsieur de Clergerie who is an historian or at least fancies himself as one. His wife Louise has died and he is thinking of getting married again. His mother is a very old woman, mainly bed-ridden and often called Mama or “Granny”. His daughter Chantal has been taught in a convent. Monsieur de Clergerie wants her to organise things until he is married again. The family is of course Catholic and the priest who often visits them is Abbe Cenabre, but Monsieur de Clergerie also converses with the family’s doctor La Perouse who is sceptic and puts his faith in science... and basically Monsieur de Clergerie goes the same way.  In many ways it is a very unhappy family, their lives not fulfilled, and there is a large dramatis personae downstairs – Fernande the cook, a formidable woman; the unreliable maid Francine; and more fearful is Francois Fiodor who is Russian. He has escaped from the wars in Russia [for the record many “White Russians” headed for France when the Bolsheviks took over]. Fiodor does many odd jobs, but he also acts as chauffeur for Chantal -  and he seems to have an unhealthy eye for her.

            The focus of the novel is on the intellectual duels between Chantal, her father Monsieur de Clergerie, Abbe Cenabre and sometimes La Perouse. While Chantal is likely to be well off, she is often unhappy and sometimes she is tired and sick. She always remembers the wisdom she had learned from old Father Chevance when she was at the convent. Father Chevance always preached the need for charity. The old priest is now dead. Her father sees the ideas of Chevance as outdated, the thoughts of a foolish old man and unreal. So father and daughter debate. Says the narrative “ When Monsieur de Clergerie had insisted on his daughter’s taking charge of his household as soon as she left the convent, he did not realize what a weight such a responsibility was on such shoulders, nor that the daily supervision of six or seven servants, collected from the Devil where knew, and discharged as casually, was a rude and perilous school for a seventeen-year-old girl who would never be altogether the dupe of her own candour, more often hurt by what she guessed than by what she saw. But she had protected herself in her own way by a miraculous goodness, quietly and without any visible effort that can attract attention or inspire either praise or blame…”    And later when Chantal looks over her lot, she is “Too sensible to indulge in vain regret that would only tighten her bonds, she only longed to take up her daily tasks again, the exercise of her household duties –simple, categorical, authentic -  and, mortified, to re-enter that the universal asylum and only refuge for saints and  sinners, a disciplined life, where she looked to find peace, like a lamb lost in a storm…”   

While her father believes in science he has taken in many crank ideas. At one point he tells his daughter that human beings will soon be able to live for ever. Chantal trumps  him by saying says to him “Heavens, I should be happy to be old!  I should love to be an old woman with spectacles and a stick, quite, close to the cemetery and the little grave, knitting a woollen stocking with a wicked twinkle in her eye.”  The fact is that she love life, not speculations about life. Her father wants her to either marry or go into a convent, neither of which she wants to do; and he keeps thinking about the woman he hopes to marry, a rich baroness. Chantal, though she is thoughtful and devout, is not sure of the advice given by the family’s priest Abbe Cenabre. She can think for herself.

            So she goes walking around the estate, looking at nature, and she thinks about how she could do better in her relationship with her father while still keeping her integrity. For a brief moment she thinks of running away…. At which very point her Grandmother bursts through the bushes and runs into Chantal. Granny was supposed to have been looked after by the unreliable maid Francine who should have been giving Granny her daily walk in a wheel- chair. Chantal calms Granny, though she does think it is a bit of a chore. The old woman is not really thankful for Chantal’s help. Instead she talks about how the estate has been gone to the dogs over the years and she is still angry about the death of Chantal’s mother. Yet, chore though it was, Chantal has an odd feeling of joy in looking after her grandmother, even if she is a crotchety, grumbling old woman. She has a purpose in life. To her Grandmother , she says  Don’t be afraid… now I am strong enough to carry you. I wish you were heavy, much heavier, as heavy as all the sins in the world. You see, I have just discovered something I have never known: we can no more escape from one another than we can escape from God. We have something in common, and that is sin.” Once again, Bernanos is telling us that the human species is very flawed in what Christians call Original Sin.                

            Meanwhile downstairs the “help” are quarrelling and speculating about the family. The formidable cook Fernande is worried that Fiodor is somehow corrupting the unreliable maid Francine. Fiodor shouts back. In fact he says that everything is in a mess in this mansion and things will only be better when Chantal is in charge… though it is clear that he wants to be partly in charge himself.

            And that is the first part of the novel. 


Part Two begins with Chantal’s father being unsure that he really wants to marry again and he still has ideas for Chantal which she does not want. Monsieur de Clergerie is, however less sure about his own beliefs.  His Entire work with its costly and deceptive bibliographic arsenal, his table, his outlines, his statistics, had probably all had their source in the ruminations of a timid and dreamy adolescent, incapable of overcoming the terrors, desires and disgusts of puberty…” Perhaps his daughter was right. At last Monsieur de Clergerie comes to understand what sort of a man he himself really is. The doctor and sceptic La Perouse tells him about the way young women behave... or at least that is what he thinks he knows.

La Perouse has a long conversation with the Russian Fiodor. It is obvious that Fiodor wants to influence Chantal. La Perouse tells him that he is a fool and he will probably commit suicide when his grandiose ideas come to nothing. At which point Granny rushes about saying that “a girl” had hurt her and slapped her around the face. She is referring to Chantal. Chantal is able to explain that she had to slap the old lady when she had become hysterical and she had calmed her down. Granny still thinks that she is in charge of the house and she has kept keys which she thinks make her the owner of the house. Chantal is able to persuade Granny to hand the keys over to her and she puts Granny peacefully to bed. By this stage even her father understands that Chantal is the best keeper of the house. There follows a long conversation between Chantal and La Perouse about how she should have dealt with the old lady. La Perouse introduces many ideas coming from Freud. Chantal deals with charity and real situations.

Yet in all this Chantal understands that Fear is worse than Death, for she has gone through a time of real fear and has been unsure about her beliefs. Fear wears you down and makes you too ready to give in to foolish ideas and destructive ideas simply because they are popular. She understands that one has to take risks, seeing the best in people and being aware of those who do not mean well. She is not naïve. When she talks with the house priest Abbe Cenabre she is aware that he is only half interested in his work, even almost half-way to being sceptical when he speaks of religion. The family now think matters in the house are now in order. But there is no happy ending in this novel. Crazy Fiodor kills Chantal before he commits suicide.

So, you immediately may ask, how is there Joy in this novel? And here you have to think carefully. The family too often think of Joy in terms of hedonistic good times and a life of ease. But in her own terms, Chantal sees Joy as keeping her integrity, keeping her beliefs  and not destroyed the lives of other people. This is true joy.

  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.  *.

            Forgive me for making a rather crude comment that I sometimes feel like saying when I read some French literature. This does not mean all French novels, but it does apply to some French novels. Often intellectual French novelists like to have long discourses about ideas and philosophy in the midst of a narrative. This, I think, is true of Les Tenebres / Joy.    

Something Thoughtful

   Nicholas Reid reflects in essay form on general matters and ideas related to literature, history, popular culture and the arts, or just life in general. You are free to agree or disagree with him.   

TAKING AN ACCOUNT OF “REID’S READER”.

Reid’s Reader began in 2011 and it has continued to 2026. I intend to keep it going. At first I posted my reviews and comments every week with the same headings Something New [meaning new books]; Something Old [classic and / or recent books]; and Something Thoughtful  [which means anything I want to write about – movies, politics, history, annoying things etc. etc.]. However after some years I realised that this was too difficult a schedule to keep up with. So now I post my reviews and comments every fortnight and even then I have to absent myself when I go overseas for a holiday; and I always give myself a break between Christmas and the beginning of January. What this means is that I have reviewed and commented on [literally] hundreds of books.      

Over these years I have got to know what the most interested readers of Reid’s Reader are. They are of course mainly New Zealanders. New Zealand’s poets read my reviews of their work, with about 100 readers – and sometimes more than that - each time their poetry is reviewed. But when it comes to novels, biographies and history, far more readers read than a mere 100 readers.  In fact usually they reach over 1,000, and this includes novels written in the Eighteenth Century, Nineteenth Century and Twentieth Century. I am well aware that many students read my reviews as “cribs” for novels which they are supposed to be studying. The works of Balzac, F.Scott Fitzgerald, George Orwell, William Golding, five works of Charles Dickens, much of H. G. Wells and many others have been reviewed on this blog. These novels and others always attract more than 1,000. I quote Evelyn Waugh’s Sword of Honour [1,375] ; Henry David Thoreau’s Walden [1,400 ] ; Charles Dickens’ Little Dorrit [1,192 ] ; William Makepeace Thackeray’s The Newcomes [1,233 ] ; Balzac’s “Le Pere Goriot” [1,574] ; Raymond Radiguet’s “Le Diable au Corps” [1,941]; Jose Eustasio Rivera’s “The Vortex” [1,771] ; Graham Green’s “Journey Without Maps”; John Keats’s “Isabella or the Pot of Basil” [1,148] and many, many, others. Most important novels break the 1,000 ribbon… but there are also those who go further … and the winners are Angela Wanhalla’s “Matters of the Heart” [3,249]; and Victor Hugo’s “The Laughing Man” [3,776]; and above all there is the story of Kaspar Houser [21,908]. You can read all of these in Reid’s Reader.   You will find all these by looking up the names of poets , novelists and historians. The books I have mentioned are small part of what there is in Reid’s Reader. And for the record I must note that many of my readers come from America, Australia and Britain as well as New Zealanders.