Nicholas
Reid reflects in essay form on general matters and ideas related to
literature, history, popular culture and the arts, or just life in general. You are free to agree
or disagree with him.
IN HIGH DUDGEON WITH A LOT OF HARRUMPHING
Gentle reader, I
am going to harrumph. And not only am I going to harrumph, but I am going to
say “Pshaw!” And not only am I going to say “Pshaw!” but I am going to add “Oh
fie!” and end with a loud “Bah, humbug!”
It happened
thus.
For three days I
was shepherding my two eldest grandchildren, visiting from England, around the
city of Wellington. We visited such wondrous places as Somes Island and the
Karori nature reserve, which has now been poncily renamed “Zealandia”, where my
12-year-old granddaughter had ample opportunity to indulge her favourite hobby
– photographing birds in their native habitat. We visited Cuba Mall, where my 14-year-old
grandson had ample opportunity to follow his strongest interests by lingering
long in one boutique specialising in geeky comics and another specialising in
computer games. And of course we went to Te Papa and saw Peter Jackson’s
gargantuan mythologisation of New Zealand soldiers at Gallipoli. And we saw one
suitable stage play.
Nice place,
Wellington, despite its “daylong driving
cloud”. Please do remember that it is an Aucklander who is writing this.
But then the
fateful moment came when my digestion was quite ruined and my equanimity lost.
No, it was not the so-called “National Portrait Gallery” with its
undistinguished daubs. Nor was it the tour of Weta Workshops, more to my
grandchildren’s taste than mine.
It happened when
we stepped into the modest Wellington Museum, which concentrates on the history
of the port and mariners and shipping and the like. We watched the vivid and
wrenching black-and-white film of the sinking of the “Wahine”, rendered more
immediate to my grandchildren by my telling them that their great-uncle (my
elder brother) was one of the young army officers who had the awful task of gathering
up bodies that were washed up on the Eastbourne side of the harbour. We looked
at interesting items about immigrants of formers times and the toil of
watersiders.
Then, alas, we
went up to a line of illustrated placards each of which purported to give a
significant Wellington event for each year of the 20th century.
One of them told
the untruthful and completely fanciful story of Gordon Coates, Minister of
Works, telling a group of unemployed workers in 1932 that they should go to the
Basin Reserve and “eat grass”. Doubtless some political opponents spread this
fabricated story at the time, but it was and is pure moonshine.
Granted the
placard attempts to cover its arse by referring to this as Coates’ “alleged”
comment, but as it has no basis at all in historical fact, why bother repeating
it at all?
To compound
matters, this singularly inept placard was headed “Shades of Marie Antoinette”,
comparing Coates’ “alleged” response to the fiction that Queen Marie Antoinette
said of starving Parisian who had no bread “Let them eat cake”. This particular
historical lie has been debunked innumerable times. (The fable of the cruel
queen who said “Let them eat cake” had been in circulation for decades before
Marie Antoinette was even born, and was first associated with her by a
political pamphleteer about 50 years after her death.) Once again, the placard
does a little arse-covering by stating that the queen was “said to have” made
the fictitious reply. And once again I ask – why bother perpetuating what is
known to be a fiction?
I assume that an
institution like the Wellington Museum employs people to research and write the
captions to their exhibits. In this case, the untruthful story about Coates and
the untruthful story about Marie Antoinette led to mention of the riots by
unemployed people that took place in both Wellington and Auckland. But why lead
into such an important historical set of events by telling what is completely
unhistorical? That way lies mythology rather than history.
It annoys me to
see popular fictions posing as information.
So harrumph,
“Pshaw!” “Oh fie!” and a dozen “Bah, humbugs!”
No comments:
Post a Comment