[NOTICE TO READERS: For five years, Reid's Reader has been presenting an entirely free service to readers with commentary on books new and old. Reid's Reader
receives no grants or subsidies and is produced each week in many hours
of unpaid work. If you wish to contribute, on an entirely voluntary
basis, to the upkeep of this blog, we would be very grateful if you made
a donation via the PayPal "DONATE" button that now appears at the top
of the index at right. Thank you.]
We feature each week Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.
“EXTRAORDINARY ANYWHERE” edited by Ingrid
Horrocks and Cherie Lacey (Victoria
University Press, $40)
Reviewing a book
of essays is as hellish a task as reviewing a volume of poems. Strictly
speaking, each essay deserves to be analysed and criticised on its own terms –
and preferably at some length. But constraints of space and time make this
impossible in a review, and as often as not, one ends up giving general impressions
rather than worthwhile analyses.
I’m easing my
way as gently as I can into talking about Extraordinary
Anywhere. Subtitled “Essays on Place from Aotearoa New Zealand”, this is a
collection of 17 essays edited by Ingrid Horrocks and Cherie Lacey. To begin
with one interesting bibliographical detail about the publication as artefact:
this paperback is surrounded by a full dust-jacket, designed by Jo Bailey and
Anna Brown and called a “design colophon”, which orients us to the idea of
place as memory and mind-map.
The editors’
introduction (called “Writing Here”) has the drawback of attempting to
synopsise briefly every contribution to the volume, but it does note accurately
that it is now “impossible to present any
one place as a microcosm of the wider nation” (p.11). The type of writing
about place with which this book concerns itself is very much part of the
general reaction against the myth of a unitary national identity and a
“national history” that can encompass us all. The role of individual experiences
of particular places is seen, say the
editors, in the upsurge of blogging, and the increasing number of New Zealand
writers who now turn to personal autobiographical essays to convey the sense of
a particular place and environment.
(It is notable that some contributors to Extraordinary
Anywhere are tutors in non-fiction writing at various tertiary institutions).
The editors then
explain that they have divided the essays into three sections. The first deals
with the essayists’ encounters with single locations. The second deals with
mobility, that is, the essayists’ experiences in moving from place to
place. The third deals with imagined
locations; or locations conjured up by technology. While reading my way through
the volume, I could see how this functioned theoretically, but the brute fact
was that such categories quickly became irrelevant. In each of the three
sections, personal experiences and reflections mix with literary references and
theory about writing. Regardless of the place they are assigned by the editors,
all contributors are in conversation with their own past, with locations and
with their reading. The less engaging contributions lean a little too heavily
on theory. The most engaging are of course the most confessional.
Take Ashleigh Leigh’s “The Te Kuiti
Underground” (the first in the book). It comes closest of all to being pure nostalgia
as Young recalls her days as a teenager wanting desperately to know the rock
and pop groups of her time, wanting to get away from her small town, and then
making the extraordinary and liberating discovery that her father had had
exactly the same urges at her age. This is memoir as poetic evocation. [See
elsewhere on this blog a –regrettably brief – review of Young’s poetry
collection Magnificent Moon.]
Much later in
the volume is the similarly autobiographical essay by Harry Ricketts [look up reviews on this blog of various of his
works] “Finding the Here in Elsewhere”, basically about Ricketts’ transient life
as the son of a British Army officer who was posted from place to place. This
becomes a discourse on finding identity in shifting locations; and then an
account of a friend who made his ‘home’ in somewhere he largely imagined.
Quite different
in tone and intention is Alice Te Punga
Somerville’s “Maori Writing in Place; Writing in Maori Place”. Essentially
this is a piece of advocacy. Somerville begins by taking the long way
around defining what exactly we mean by “place”, moves into (her liveliest
section) personal memories of Wellington which in turn become a lament for lost
memories of the Maori “imprint” upon Wellington and ends as a protest against
the paucity of selections by Maori writers in anthologies.
Then there are
those workmanlike (and workwomanlike) essays, which combine sense of place
with literary criticism.
As Alex Calder has written extensively on
this subject before [see on this blog a short review of his The Settler’s Plot], it is
understandable that this is the mode he adopts. Calder’s essay “Where the Road
Leads: Place and Melodrama” begins as a personal memoir of sojourning in a
rural house that was once used as the set for a not-very-good New Zealand
horror (or ghost) film. This leads Calder to consider how melodrama seems to
flourish in half-settled societies, like early Pakeha New Zealand, where social
conditions are still raw and social distinctions have not yet ossified. In
turn, the essay becomes a not-entirely-convincing defence of Dan Davin’s
melodramatic Roads from Home,
especially its over-the-top conclusion.
On a similarly
literary wavelength, Annabel Cooper’s
“Childhood Haunts”, while weighted with a somewhat heavy and circumlocutory
academic rationale, is essentially a comparison of four memoirs by four
different New Zealand writers – Mary Lee, James Cowan, Keith Sinclair and Peter Wells [see books by Wells
reviewed on this blog]. Cooper’s simple aim is to show how each writer mythologised,
and used as a gauge for self-understanding, the environment in which he or she
grew up.
The other most
overtly literary excursion is Jack Ross’s
“On the Road to Nowhere”, setting a reading of landscape against Samuel
Butler’s Erewhon (and labouring long
over the question of why Butler kept changing his description of the statues
that guard Butler’s imagined land.)
Another category
includes essays that ponder on the impact of technology, such as Giovanni Tiso considering how Facebook
and Google take over and neutralise (or perhaps neuter) our own memories of
holidays and places; and Tim Corballis
[see review on this blog of his two novellas RHI] being rather more coldly intellectual as he considers how
maps at once confirm and annihilate places.
You will notice
that so far I have conscientiously name-checked eight of this book’s 17
contributors.
Time now to man
up and say where I felt most and least engaged in these texts.
I confess to
finding Lynn Jenner’s “The [taniwha]
of Poplar Avenue” a rather confusing contrast of Maori and Pakeha perceptions.
I admit I didn’t “get” it. Surprisingly, too, it was the two essays by the
editors that seemed most confounded by the need to articulate theory. Cherie Lacey’s “Underwater Beach” has a
powerful literalist underpinning in her account of land that was buried and
land that was thrust up in the great 1931 Napier earthquake. But it takes some
patience to follow her interpretation of Napier as the palimpsest upon which
the unconscious mind can be written as if the location were a series of
psychoactive signals. Ingrid Horrocks’s
“Writing Pukeahu” begins as an exploration of the Wellington that lies closest
to Victoria University, focusing on the marae and bicultural interaction. I
endorse wholeheartedly some of her judgments, as when she expresses misgiving
at the gargantuan Anzac exhibition organised by Peter Jackson “as though history, especially war, is an
action flick, a dam-busting event with fantastic landscapes and visitor
numbers. And with excellent export options. As though the history we needed to
remember now was only a hundred years old.”(p.85) At a certain point,
however, Horrocks’s contribution becomes too cautious and academic a project
report on compiling an anthology about place.
Time now to list
the six essays that most fed my brain, enlightened me and put me in fruitful
ways of thinking.
Sally Blundell’s
“Reoccupying Christchurch” is unashamedly a piece of high-end journalism,
joining what is now a growing corpus of thoughtful writing on the
post-earthquake city. [See, on this blog, reviews of Jane Bowron’s newspaper
despatches Old Bucky and Me; and Fiona
Farrell’s The Broken Book and The Villa at the Edge of the Empire.]
Like Farrell in some respects, Sally Blundell is aware of the way commercial
imperatives in the rebuilding of the city sometimes override community needs;
but she is also aware of the way the community shows signs of asserting itself
and modifying the blueprints other people have drawn for them.
To me as an
historian, Tony Ballantyne’s “Chop
Suey patties and Histories of Place” was the volume’s very best exercise in
combining personal observation with historical theory. This is as much as I
would expect from the man who wrote Entanglementsof Empire [see review on this blog]. Ballantyne begins his essay somewhat
wryly with accounts of his and his family’s encounters with Asian (mainly
Chinese) eateries in Dunedin’s old working-class suburb of Caversham – which
has of course been the site of intensive and prolonged study by the University
of Otago’s History Department. From this, Ballantyne works out into the
principles of understanding communities as “process”, not as fixed entities,
and of considering communities in detail before making overarching statements
about national “identity”.
Lydia Wevers’s
curtly-titled “Dirt” is an exercise in demonstrating how physical artefacts can
tell us of the nature of a past community. Wevers considered the battered,
stained, sometimes physically-dirty books that were part of the Brancepeth
library, bequeathed to the Victoria University Library. Brancepeth was a
Wairarapa sheep station, the books dated from a century ago and most were part
of a lending library available to shearers, farm worker and others. Her
examination of the books allow Wevers to adduce what sort of reading these
labourers and unskilled workers liked, how and when they read, and what their
reading choices said about their dreams and desires – and social status. The
community is revisited through what it has left behind.
I loved the
freshness in the writing of Tina
Makereti, who is more imaginative writer than academic. Her “By Your Place
in the World, I Will Know Who You Are” presents the interesting perspective of
one who does not trace her origins to one turangawaewae. As she says “there is an expectation that Maori should
know where they come from, yet I write as a Maori who doesn’t have grounding in
one place, one tribe or one culture, but who is still Maori. I am Pakeha too. I
am not part-Maori and Part-Pakeha; I am both Maori an Pakeha.”
(pp.169-170) The implications of this are worked out in her literary practice.
Ian Wedde is probably the
longest-established literary practitioner represented in this volume. [See on
this blog reviews of his Trifecta, The Life Guard, and The Catastrophe]. In his essay “A Real
Piece….”, Wedde at first seems to be wandering aimlessly as he describes his
daily walk in Ponsonby and his café-visiting way of life there. This seems like
the introduction to a tale of being an urban flaneur (not that Wedde ever uses that term). But it segues into
thoughts on how he captures experience in his notebooks and hence how
self-consciousness and awareness are the keys to autobiographies concerning
place. But then the concept of “place” itself is really a construct… whereupon
Wedde discourses charmingly on the blurred line between objective and
constructed places, exemplified by the advertising campaign surrounding the
fictitious-but-real Hobbiton. The essay may amble but it is amiable.
Martin Edmond’s closing “response
essay” replies to the whole book, emphasising that the “archive” (objective
historical data) and “memory” (human experience) should always be in
conversation wen we write of place.
As I warned at
the beginning of this notice, reviewing a book of essays is a hellish task, but
I’m methodical enough to believe that the right way to go about it is to take
note of all the contents, as I have done here. I hope this gives some idea of
the collections variety, and of the fact that there is more to savour than
regret.
No comments:
Post a Comment