Not everything worth reading is hot off the press. In this section, Nicholas Reid recommends "something old" that is still well worth reading. "Something old" can mean anything from a venerable and antique classic to a good book first published five or more years ago.
“OPEN SECRET - The
Autobiography of the former Director General of MI5” by Stella Rimington (first
published 2001; written 1998-99)
By their
very nature, security (i.e. spy) services are secretive and their operatives
fairly anonymous – more like the grey, seedy bureaucrats of a Le Carre thriller
than like that flashy fantasy figure James Bond.
So when, a
few years back, I sat down to read Stella Rimington’s memoirs, I wasn’t
expecting a jolt a minute. But I was surprised at how incredibly bland and dull
the book was.
Famously,
Rimington was the first woman to become director-general of MI5, in which role
she served from 1992 to 1996, supervising Britain’s counter-intelligence and
counter-terrorism. She got there because, for some years, the secret service
had been working very hard to shuck off its image as a boys-only outfit
dominated by the Old School Tie of the better-known “Public” Schools and
Oxbridge – the background that furnished Burgess, McLean and Philby among other
embarrassments. A respectable number of women were now being recruited,
including some who dropped their aitches or had regional accents. Rimington
wasn’t from Oxbridge, but had been educated at Edinburgh and Liverpool
universities.
The secret
service was also under much pressure to become as “open” as was consonant with
being a spy service. Rimington was the first head of spooks to give regular TV
interviews during her tenure.
When she
got to writing this memoir, she apparently had to do a little battle with the
Official Secrets Act and she made some public fuss about how she had to
self-censor. For all her noise, though, the result is fairly anonymous.
Especially in its closing chapters, it is also fairly repetitive. Rimington
treads and re-treads the same ideas about necessary secrets even in an open
society; about security services as the protector and defender of democracy; about
the need for as much openness and transparency as is consistent with security;
about the glibness and distortions of the press; and about the glass ceiling
for women, which lingers in both private corporations and the government
sector.
There is a clear
tension between the frequent “girls-can-do-anything”
theme, and the author’s more conservative instincts as a patriot who likes
order and method.
She is very
careful not to betray any party-political biases or tendencies. She pleads that
the security services serve and brief impartially any democratically-elected
government. She refutes the rumour that (long before her time as boss) MI5 in
any way sought to undermine Harold Wilson’s Labour government. However she does
make it clear that MI5 had evidence of opportunistic Soviet infiltration of the
anti-nuke “peace” movement (Greenham Common etc.) and of the National Union of
Miners at the time of Arthur Scargill and the miners’ rolling strikes. Nowhere
does she say these movements were dominated
by Soviet infiltration and her testimony is credible. That most of her stories
of interface with the prime minister are with John Major is presumably simply
indicative of the fact that he was PM during her tenure. Even so, given her
background (lower-middle-class, later diplomatic service in India) and some of
her attitudes, it’s hard not to think of her as a Tory in something of the
Margaret Thatcher mould.
As in all
memoirs, there are big gaps. She became estranged and separated from her
husband without the two of them divorcing, but the marriage break-up is passed
over in a few sentences. Most disappointing, there is virtually nothing
specific about any of the espionage she oversaw– obviously self-censorship and
the Official Secrets Act at work. The only revelation to me was that Peter
Wright was such a flake in his Spycatcher
book. I was also a little rocked by the naivete of Rimington and her service in
cuddling up to ex-KGB personnel when the Soviet Empire collapsed.
When I
first read Open Secret, I could have
sworn that it was written by a ghost-writer, so dully did its prose thud along.
On second thoughts, it could well have been written by a woman used to filing
official reports. I say this because,
since her retirement and the writing of Open Secret, Rimington has published six spy novels. She has also
been one of the “celebrity” judges for the Booker awards and was one of those
who made a fuss about how unreadable so many long-listed literary novels were.
It is
interesting to read on-line reviews of this book. They divide evenly between
those outraged that she hasn’t said more and those congratulating her for
holding the line. The Guardian got
Labour MP Chris Mullin to review it. He disputed some of Rimington’s facts but
generally approved of the book. When it first appeared, parts of Open Secret ran as a serial in the Guardian, its distaste for Tory
attitudes being no match for its hunger for topicality.
I read Rimington's first novel "At Risk" and it was the least thrilling thriller I've ever read. Every "twist" was exactly what you'd expect, with chapters from the point of view of the terrorist... and yet without anything like an attempt to understand the terrorist's point of view.
ReplyDelete-ben