Nicholas
Reid reflects in essay form on general matters and ideas related to
literature, history, popular culture and the arts, or just life in general. You are free to agree
or disagree with him.
GENEALOGY
Speaking
in strictly biological terms, and ignoring the matter of adoption, we all have
two parents. Therefore we all have four grandparents. Therefore we all
have eight great-grandparents. Therefore
we all have sixteen great-great-grandparents. Therefore we all have thirty-two
great-great-great grandparents. Therefore we all have sixty-four great-great-great-great-grandparents.
Assuming each generation to be between 25 and 30 years, this takes us back only
somewhere between 150 and 200 years. Take our ancestry back 500 or 1000 or
10,000 years, and we all have thousands and ultimately millions of forebears.
Considering
this fact should be a good tonic against biological racism. Ultimately, we are
all connected in one human race. In some way, the body of each of us is the
product of the whole of human history, despite all the ways, over thousands of
years, that different ethnicities have developed, at least partly as the result
of long-term adaptation of peoples to different climates. All of us have
ancestors in common with Asians, Africans, Native Americans, Australian
Aborigines, Europeans, Semitic Peoples and Pacific Peoples.
Considering
the genetic inheritance of each of us, dominant or recessive genes will
determine if we do or do not have a certain colour of skin and eyes, a certain
colour and type of hair, a certain size and shape of body and perhaps a certain
level of intelligence. Matters of temperament (are you mainly melancholic, choleric,
sanguine or phlegmatic etc.?) seem to be as much a matter of environment,
upbringing and social influences as of biology. Yet the specific genetic
inheritance of each of us will be unique. Allowing for the rare phenomenon of
the “genetic throwback”, siblings will probably have a family likeness. But
even as the offspring of the same parents, they will not be identical – and
even identical twins have their physical differences. Having exactly the same
forebears does not mean being exactly the same sort of person. None of us is
produced by a cookie-cutter.
As
well as warning us against racism, all these considerations should be a good
vaccine against any neurosis concerning what we have genetically inherited. To
discover that one or two of our ancestors had severe defects in character or
behaviour, or even mental competence, does not mean that any of us is
predestined to have the same traits. Biologically, we do not inherit exactly
the same characteristics as one or two of our forebears. Can madness run
through a family? Possibly – but it does not mean that all members of the
family will be mad.
Why
am I delivering this dead obvious and platitudinous sermon?
Because
not too long ago, I read a book in which a woman worried about two of her
biological forebears who, she discovered, had severe character defects and
medical problems. She feared that she might have inherited some of their mental
and physical weaknesses. Yet in the end, she came to undertand that what she
was, was as much the product of her – very good – upbringing and environment as
of her genetic inheritance. And besides, the two (deceased) forebears who
worried her were only a small part of the genetic jigsaw that she herself was.
I
write all this to refute the pseudo-science of eugenics, which is making a
comeback in new guises. Eugenics would mechanically damn and/or destroy human
beings for their supposed inherited defects, in the absurd quest for only
“perfect” offspring. Often eugenics has been, and still is, allied to hard biological
racism. And it is ultimately nonsense. The existence of each of us is not the result
of the sort of hard determinism that eugenics always presupposes. We are each unique. And we are all part of the human family.
No comments:
Post a Comment