[NOTICE TO READERS: For over four years, Reid's Reader has been presenting an entirely free service to readers with commentary on books new and old. Reid's Reader
receives no grants or subsidies and is produced each week in many hours
of unpaid work. If you wish to contribute, on an entirely voluntary
basis, to the upkeep of this blog, we would be very grateful if you made
a donation via the PayPal "DONATE" button that now appears at the top
of the index at right. Thank you.]
We feature each week Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.
We feature each week Nicholas Reid's reviews and comments on new and recent books.
“NIUE 1774-1974:
Two Hundred Years of Contact and Change” by Margaret Pointer (Otago University
Press, $NZ50)

Like
me, you probably have to look up Niue on a map. It is north of the Kermadecs,
south of Samoa, between Tonga and the Cooks, and somehow connected to New
Zealand. Its people are Polynesian. It is small, and with a resident population
that is diminishing as more Niueans become permanent residents of Auckland and
environs. There was once a politician called Robert Rex who was associated with
it.
That,
in one short paragraph, is about as much as I, in my ignorance, knew about Niue
before opening Niue 1774-1974.
Margaret
Pointer’s husband was New Zealand High Commissioner on Niue in the late 1990s and she
lived on the island with her family for five years. She has made a number of
return visits in the course of researching her book. She describes her first
sighting of the island in the 1990s as she saw it from a plane: “No looming volcanic peaks, no sparkling
azure lagoon, no tiny atolls, just one large piece of flat rock less than half
the size of Lake Taupo.” (Introduction, p.13). We are at once made aware of
the island’s isolation and smallness, both of which have been factors in the
Niueans’ development. In a popular and accessible style, but with a wealth of
solid research behind it, Niue 1774-1974
sets out to tell the island’s story from first European contact to the
achievement of internal self-government and independence.
Margaret Pointer
neatly divides her text [liberally sprinkled with “break-ins” of stories with
particular significance] into four sections. First, the island before any
European settlement. Then the island coming gradually under British control and
into the orbit of the British Empire in the late nineteenth century. Then the
years from 1903 to the 1960s, when Niue was under New Zealand administration.
And finally the shift towards independence.

The name Savage
Island was itself a deterrent to further European interest, and it seems that
it was not for fully another fifty-plus years before outsiders touched on the
island - a Yankee whaler looking for fresh water in 1828. Only in 1849 (by
which time most other Pacific islands had been mapped, explored or claimed by
the British or the French) did a British naval vessel call on Niue. There was
one widespread story of a shipwrecked crew having been murdered and eaten by
islanders, but the detail of cannibalism is almost certainly fictitious.
Niueans did not eat red meat. Fish and taro, yam and coconuts were their diet.
Once Yankee and British ships began to visit, Niueans were eager to gain metal
fishhooks as trade items, as they were so much more reliable than the bone and
wooden hooks upon which they had had to rely for centuries. Europeans
introduced pigs in the 1850s, but Niueans refused to eat them, and kept them
only for barter when passing ships wanted provisions. Also, unlike most
Polynesian peoples, Niueans did not practise tattooing. They were surprised by the
tattoos that were sometimes sported by European sailors.
It was not explorers
and passing whalers or naval men who changing Niuean society, however, but Protestant
missionaries. Coming from the evangelical London Missionary Society, one
missionary visited, but did not land on, the island in the 1830s. LMS-taught
Samoan “native mission teachers” were landed on Niue in early 1850. They had an
immediate impact and prepared the way for the first European missionary to set
foot on the island in 1857. In some parts of the Pacific, prolonged early
contacts with Europeans led to population decline as new diseases were
introduced. Paradoxically, the population of Niue increased under the
impact of missionaries as the newcomers preached against clan warfare and
infanticide. Margaret Pointer suggests that, as in all Pacific missionary
history, there have been debates concerning how much the initial acceptance of
Christianity was a matter of being attracted to the material advantages
Europeans had to offer. [See my earlier postings on The French Place in the Bay of Islands, Entanglements of Empire, Outcasts of the Gods? etc.]
When she settles
into the second part of her history, Margaret Pointer has to concentrate on
what amounts to the prolonged “rule” of the missionaries, and the tension that
developed with other outside influences. As late as 1860, there was no single
European resident on Niue. The first was the formidable LMS missionary William George
Lawes in 1861. Pointer notes:
“At the
outset… Niue was something of an LMS ‘laboratory’. Where else did an English
missionary settle to spread the word and not have to contend with other
Europeans behaving badly? No idle, blaspheming sailors waiting for the next
vessel, no traders tempting the locals into debt, no merchants offering the
demon drink, no beachcombers or other arrivals seeking the pleasures of the
flesh. No other missionary society attempted to establish itself on Niue in the
nineteenth century.” (Chapter 5 p.90)
Up until the 1890s,
Lawes and his extended missionary family were the only resident Europeans on
Niue. Pointer stresses that the Lawes clan were respectful of local culture,
hardworking and benevolent; but they did impose a moral code involving
regularised Christian marriage, seemly dress and a prohibition of alcohol; and they
suggested punishments (administered by the separate villages) for those who
infringed the code. The influence of this code remained very strong until the
mid-twentieth century, and was to come into conflict with later forms of
governance. In the Lawes’ time, the village of Alofi and its church became the centre
of island activity. But the island’s society began to change with the arrival
of traders and the copra trade. By the 1890s, many young Niuean men were going
off to indentured labour elsewhere. There were shocking experiences, such as
groups of Niueans being kidnapped by Peruvian ships to work as forced labour
collected guano. Single men were often indentured for guano digging on distant (and
barren) Malden Island. Couples were sometimes indentured as labour in copra
plantations in Fiji and elsewhere. By the early 1900s, about a tenth of Niue’s
population was always away working elsewhere in the Pacific.
Under the impact
of missionaries, there had developed a “Fono” or island council at which many
village chiefs met together for general discussions and decision-making. There
was a “king” for some years, but he was chosen from among the chiefs and the
office did not last long. Sometimes the locals, encouraged by missionaries,
sent petitions requesting that Niue become a British protectorate. But in the 1880s
and 1890s, as the British and Germans jockeyed for influence in that part of
Pacific, it was agreed the Niue would be “neutral” territory.

In her long
section on the sixty-odd years of New Zealand administration, it is clear that
some enduring laws were very much of their age. Alcohol remained absolutely
forbidden to the indigenous people, but acceptable for Europeans. European
ministers could marry both indigenous and European couples, but indigenous
ministers could marry only indigenous couples. Margaret Pointer does not dwell
on this, but there is a slight whiff of apartheid to these and other laws and
customs, although there was no ban on interracial marriage, which happened
often enough considering the tiny size of the island’s Palagi population.
Regrettably for
New Zealand’s reputation, it is clear that the administration of Niue tended to
attract neither the most ambitious nor the most qualified New Zealand
officials. Scandal (hushed up at the time) engulfed the first resident
commissioner, Christopher Maxwell, who lasted only a few years. Maxwell broke the
Suppression of Immorality Ordinance Act, which he had signed into law, by
having an affair with a married native woman. The second resident commissioner
Henry Cornwall lasted ten years (1907-17), but he too got into trouble and was
eventually confronted over the fact that he had impregnated at least one native
woman and seduced others and yet had passed, in court, judgment on men who had
done similar heinous things.
We might now
also pass different judgements from the patriotic ones that were passed at the
time on the 125 young Niuean men served for New Zealand in the First World War.
Like other non-white troops, but unlike at least some New Zealand Maori, they
were not used as combat troops. Instead they
“carried supplies, loaded and
unloaded vessels, stood guard, manned ammunition dumps, dug trenches and built
duckboards, served food and cleaned latrines.” (p.194) In France the Niueans,
out of their tropical climate, were put into the front line to dig trenches. Most
of them quickly contracted pneumonia, were invalided out, and came back – permanently
sick – to Niue within a year. Because shipping stopped there so rarely, Niue was
spared the lethal “influenza” plague that visited Samoa (and New Zealand) in
1918-19, but the story of the Niuean soldiers is still a tragic instance of an
indigenous people’s involvement in a war that was not theirs.
After New
Zealand had taken over the former German colony of Samoa, Niue became an even
less desirable posting for New Zealand officials seeking work in the Pacific.
Most preferred Samoa or the Cook Islands, which had more direct communications
with the outside world (although Niue did get its first radio link with New
Zealand in 1924). In 1921, there was the notorious case of a murder trial being
ineptly conducted by the resident schoolteacher when the resident commissioner
was absent and there was no qualified official to second him.

Niue did not
directly contribute to forces in Second World War, although there were some young
men who were willing to enlist. Indeed some came to New Zealand specifically to
do so. One long-serving resident commissioner (again blotting the copybook of
New Zealand administration) left with a huge and embarrassing pile of unpaid debts
and clear signs of embezzlement. Then there was a big conflict between the old-style
LMS missionary who was so deeply opposed to work on the Sabbath that for a
number of years he virtually wrecked the island’s banana trade, because there
were only limited times that ships could arrive to pick up the island’s produce. If
they arrived on a Sunday, the crop of bananas could not be collected and was
left to rot on the wharf, as there was no harbour allowing ships to anchor
overnight. This problem was solved only when the old zealot was replaced by a
more accommodating minister.
The biggest jolt
that New Zealand administration of Niue ever received came in 1953. Hector
Larsen, a forthright, outspoken, but capable resident commissioner, was murdered
in his home at night by an intruder, with his wife and children barely escaping
the same fate. In the ensuing trial (and condemnation to death) of the three
prison escapees who committed the murder, a political storm blew up in New
Zealand about inadequacies of the administration of justice in Niue, and the
fact that New Zealand personnel sent to Niue were often poorly trained and ill-prepared
for the administrative work they were meant to do. New Zealand was implicitly
criticised for its failure to prepare Niue for the greater autonomy it should have
been enjoying under new United Nations initiatives. Of Larsen’s murder, Margaret
Pointer argues: “It has to be blamed on a
systemic failure going back 50 years. It has to be seen within the context of
successive New Zealand governments’ administration of Niue – their neglect,
lack of understanding, oversight. It has to be seen within the context of
colonial administration generally, and the administration of a small and
isolated island in particular. The system of administration that had been
allowed to evolve in Niue meant that Hector Larsen was let down by the New
Zealand government. There were warning balls, some sounding back decades.”
(Chapter 13 “An End to Complacency”, p.272)
Logically,
the fourth and last section of Niue
1774-1974 deals with the island’s road to (a sort of) independence. Robert
Rex, beginning as a capable translator, emerged as the logical leader for an
independent governing body. The cyclone disaster that struck Niue in 1959 oddly
contributed to the move towards independence by showing some weaknesses in
local organization, even though much necessary help was sent to Niue from New
Zealand. By the 1960s there was a strong move towards internal self-government while
sustaining links with New Zealand. By the time independence was achieved in
1974, the island was much more open to the world, with an airfield having been
constructed and full communication links in place.
And it is at
this point, forty years ago, that Margaret Pointer ends her story. Perhaps she
thought it was not for a Palagi to chronicle the island’s political history
over the last four decades. Even so, it does leave thing hanging in the air
somewhat, and I wish her “Afterword” could have been longer and more
comprehensive.
As you have
probably gathered from my above simple summary of the book’s contents, I found Niue 1774-1974 interesting and very
informative reading. While being aware that the island and its community are
tiny, the book shows a very strong awareness that, for the island’s
inhabitants, each event that it records was momentous. The island, in effect,
was once (but is no longer) a world unto itself.
I must record a
few minuses. Only in her brief afterword does Margaret Pointer note that Niue’s
population is now merely somewhere between 1200 and 1500 people. Although it is
mentioned elsewhere in the text, there is far too little on the impact of
emigration, and the resident population’s decline from a maximum of about
4,500. We hear virtually nothing about the larger Niuean population that now
lives in New Zealand. Because of this major demographic fact, I do not buy
Pointer’s final vision of the unchanging and eternal island. Yes, the eternal
waves may crash on the reef and the coral may endure (if climate change lets it)
but this “eternity” of Niue is true only if you ignore the huge change that has
happened to its people in the last two centuries.
Hi Nick, welcome back. Enjoyed your review of the book on Niue. The only puzzling aspect is the correlation between the photo and the text. Are they the same island? You quote Margaret Pointer as saying “No looming volcanic peaks, no sparkling azure lagoon, no tiny atolls, just one large piece of flat rock less than half the size of Lake Taupo.” However, the pic does show several relatively steep ridges, so hardly a flat rock. I do agree with you - any book written today on a Pacific island should, or must, include a reflection on the impact of climate change. Or would that be less than diplomatic?
ReplyDeleteYes, I thought that myself when I saw the image, but it was the only one I could find labelled "Niue" in Google images.
ReplyDeleteInteresting review Mr Reid. As someone who seems to have paid a lot of detail to the book's subject matter, I must take you to task over your lapse of concentration in regards to the photo referred to by the commenter above. That is a picture of none other than Rarotonga, the main island in the Cook Islands. Neither Cook Islanders nor Niueans should they happen upon this review as I have, would appreciate this little blunder of yours. But continue. Like I said, the review was interesting.
ReplyDeleteMy sincerest apologies for any unintended disrespect. As I said, this was the only image given as Niue on Google imahes. Sorry.
ReplyDeleteThis post is genuinely incredible. I really like this post. It is remarkable among different posts that I ve read in a long time. You shake for this alright post. I genuinely welcome it! Click Here
ReplyDeleteThanks for the review. I found too it intriguing from a historic poit of view. I have read other books by Margaret by Margaret Pointer and thank her for the literature that highlights Niue in ways that noone else has.There are several history books written about other Pacific Island but very few about Niue.Therefore as a starting point it give a good basis.Unfortunately my father has since passed and he too enjoyed reading Margarets book and was able to bring to light his own interpretation of the different events on the island as they happened.
ReplyDelete