Nicholas
Reid reflects in essay form on general matters and ideas related to
literature, history, popular culture and the arts, or just life in general. You are free to agree
or disagree with him.
MY
LITTLE COCOON
I
drive to work in the morning and my car radio is always tuned to the Concert
Programme, so I enjoy about 25 minutes of classical music en route. A jolly way to prepare for the day, especially as in the
earlier morning the Concert Programme seems to prefer the lively early Baroque
pick-me-up of Vivaldi or the cheerful Classical bounce of Mozart to the
Romantic musings of Beethoven and his followers. When I drive home, I’m usually
listening to a jazz CD. Jazz and classical music – surely that is the heart of
worthwhile music, isn’t it?
When I eat my breakfast
near the kitchen radio, I am of course listening to Morning Report on National
Radio – the only possible mixture of news and intelligent commentary. Yes, before
the evening meal I do usually watch TV ONE news – for all its manifest faults -
but after dinner, when and if I am doing the dishes in the kitchen, I am again tuned
to National Radio. Earlier, I might have listened to such commentary as
Checkpoint. Then I go upstairs and set about doing something like reading or
preparing work or writing this blog. And if I have any music playing in the
background (which is only sometimes) it will be either classical or jazz, on CD
or on some computer-accessed station such as Radio Swiss Classic.
You see what I
am doing here, don’t you? I am constructing my own soundscape – upmarket news
and commentary and highbrow music.
And given this
self-chosen cocoon, it is easy for me to drift into the delusion that my
selected soundscape is the norm.
Surely this is
what ALL intelligent people listen to?
And of course,
it isn’t.
The audience for
the Concert Programme (or Concert FM, or Radio National Concert, or whatever it
is now called) is minuscule. On any given evening it is being listened to by –
at most – a couple of thousand people nationwide. I know that this fact leads
neoliberal sharks to suggest scrapping it and I personally would loudly lament
its loss. But it is a fact nevertheless.
It is also a
fact that National Radio is the most widely listened-to and respected radio
station in the country. This further fact leaves neoliberals grinding their
teeth and wishing there was some way of spiking this independent entity that
does not speak the language of commerce. I would have to note, however, that
even though no other individual radio station has the audience of National
Radio, collectively the many commercial stations, with their mix of pop or rock
music and superficial talkback and drivel pretending to be news, gain more
listeners than National Radio.
So my soundscape
– the sounds that influence me nearly every day – is in no way the national
norm or average. It in no way reflects a majority opinion and I would have to
be very arrogant indeed to assume that it is the only soundscape for
intelligent people – even if that delusion still lurks in my mind.
I think I am not
the only one to suffer from such a delusion, however. Users of social media are
often under the delusion that the opinions they share with their “friends” represent
some sort of social consensus – or at least majority opinion. Look at all those
hits given to postings. Look at the wealth of comments (often showing a poverty
of expression) that follow so many postings. Once the commentariat of Facebook
gets going, it convinces itself that its agreed opinions are the only possible
opinions. How strident they become. But Facebook is a chosen environment. It is
not society at large, and what you and your “friends” agree on represents only
what you and your non-representative “friends” agree on.
I was delighted
to have this demonstrated a couple of months back. All over Facebook, there
were postings saying what huge popular support there was for the distressingly
dull “Red Peak” flag design. Apparently there was a “surge” of support for it.
Apparently it was what the mass of New Zealanders wanted, as opposed to the
other designs that had been chosen by the official design committee. Postings
kept coming up purporting to show how its colours represented the true national
identity. And what a great victory for the popular will it was that, with the
advocacy of the Green Party, “Red Peak” was added to the other four designs in
the first round of voting over the flag.
Came the ballot
and of the five options…. Red Peak came third, some way behind the two more
popular choices.
Of course (much
as it doesn’t appeal to me) this does not necessarily mean that Red Peak was a
worse design. Of course it does not mean that one cannot criticise the two
preferred options [or like the two less popular options]. But it does mean that
a lot of people were misled into thinking they represented a consensus when
they were only looking at the inside of their chosen cocoon.
Maybe this is
merely an amplification of the old truism that we think our circle of acquaintances
is the whole world. But having so many like-minded people on a chosen media
platform really does reinforce the delusion, when we should all take the time,
frequently, to wriggle out of our cocoons.
No comments:
Post a Comment